Are the Physical and Social Capitals Still Critical Factors in Enhancing the Sluggish Productivity of Coffee Agroforestry?: The Evidence of Endogenous Growth Role at Batutegi Forest Management Unit.

Jurnal Manajemen Hutan Tropika (Journal of Tropical Forest Management), Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 30(2), P. 284 - 294

Published: Aug. 13, 2024

Urban forest management is crucial for urban development, significantly contributing to environmental, economic, and social well-being. Dolok Sanggul District, in Humbang Hasundutan Regency, offers a unique context examining technical sociocultural aspects of management. This research aims analyze these aspects' influence on District using quantitative method multiple regression analysis. The study's results indicate that both impact Technical aspects, such as law regulation regarding forestry, account 51.0% the influence. Sociocultural including community opinions awareness participation, education environment, well interaction, contribute 55.2%. Combined, exert synergistic effect, with total 63.4% These findings underscore importance integrating considerations develop effective strategies. By leveraging strengths policymakers planners can create sustainable resilient forests benefit environment. Additionally, this highlights need holistic approach values input expertise, ensuring balanced development. study provides foundation future practical applications, emphasizing critical role comprehensive planning engagement

Language: Английский

---

Critical social perspectives in forest and landscape restoration – a systematic review

Frontiers in Environmental Science, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 12

Published: Nov. 18, 2024

In response to increasing calls for better consideration of social dimensions in Forest (and) Landscape Restoration (FLR), this systematic literature review identifies and synthesises relevant themes associated with critical perspectives FLR. Critical are methodologically diverse but generally share an intention interrogate power knowledge, challenge the ‘ status quo ’ ‘taken-for-granted’ assumptions, alongside promoting justice. therefore play a key role illuminating complex global environmental governance. This asks: What is within academic discourse on FLR, what insights about FLR have these provided over period 2000–2023? A total 449 papers were published during period. An initial assessment abstracts, title keywords found addressed some way, even if only negligibly, 211 papers, evident 40 papers. These then read full, six topic areas emerged: 1) Assumptions underpinning links between human-wellbeing, particularly tendency measure human-wellbeing using simple economic indicators, challenged as naïve potentially misleading; 2) Tenure issues appear be frequently under-appreciated, serious consequences such displacement communities; 3) Top-down, technocratic models governance problematised neglecting socio-political contexts which laden value asymmetries, well implications historical legacies (e.g., colonialism); 4) While there has been proliferation discursive intent ‘engage local stakeholders’, doing so remains opaque principle practice; 5) The heterogeneity ‘local stakeholders’ emphasises need consider multiple intersections identities diversity, attend gendered FLR; 6) Accepting epistemological pluralism considered fundamental incorporating Indigenous Peoples’ knowledges into more people-centred, locally-relevant practice. concludes that, genuinely pursue imperative enhance goal regaining ecological integrity, recalibration research priorities toward interdisciplinary sciences, representation locally-situated stakeholders, required. will involve deliberation researchers, from both natural practitioners; making concerted efforts steer away simplistic framings issues, nuanced understandings responses systemic complexities embedded

Language: Английский

---

The Biotechnological Potential of Restored Atlantic Forests for the Bioeconomy

Published: Jan. 1, 2024

Language: Английский

---

La restauración socioecológica: Potencialidades del uso del enfoque de los sistemas socioecológicos y el marco analítico de sistemas de innovación social

Ecología Austral, Journal Year: 2023, Volume and Issue: 33(3), P. 839 - 851

Published: Nov. 9, 2023

Este artículo enfatiza la importancia de combinar enfoques socioecológicos e innovación social para enriquecer el concepto emergente restauración socioecológica (RSE). Una revisión integradora literatura permitió identificar elementos clave los marcos sistemas (SSE) (SIS) comprensión y aplicación RSE. Aunque se reconoce a RSE como un enfoque complejo abordar desafíos ecológicos sociales contemporáneos, nuestra evidencia que mayoría tradicionales ecológica (RE) todavía centran en aspectos técnicos ecológicos, pasando por alto participación actores integración sociocultural. Nuestro análisis demuestra perspectiva RSE, través SSE, puede enriquecerla identificando componentes esenciales desde las dimensiones ecológica. Incorporar tempranamente estas consideraciones socioecológicas evita fragmentación permite sinergias entre comunidades ecosistemas. Similarmente, integrar marco impulsa cambio facilita adoptar innovaciones diversas escalas (SES), fortaleciendo redes aclarando limitaciones políticas institucionales, necesidades diversos conocimiento. proceso dinámico reduce asimetrías poder refuerza resiliencia SSE. La redefinición presentamos fusiona SSE SIS, avanzando hacia una mejor al considerar interacciones naturales humanos. Nuestros resultados subrayaron necesidad establecer nuevos analíticos profundicen integrada SIS planificación enriqueciendo así teoría práctica RE ampliar integradores emergentes.

---