Advanced Engineering Informatics, Journal Year: 2021, Volume and Issue: 49, P. 101356 - 101356
Published: July 13, 2021
Language: Английский
Advanced Engineering Informatics, Journal Year: 2021, Volume and Issue: 49, P. 101356 - 101356
Published: July 13, 2021
Language: Английский
Automation in Construction, Journal Year: 2020, Volume and Issue: 122, P. 103517 - 103517
Published: Dec. 18, 2020
Language: Английский
Citations
777Automation in Construction, Journal Year: 2021, Volume and Issue: 127, P. 103722 - 103722
Published: April 18, 2021
Language: Английский
Citations
123Automation in Construction, Journal Year: 2022, Volume and Issue: 142, P. 104499 - 104499
Published: July 31, 2022
Language: Английский
Citations
103Automation in Construction, Journal Year: 2022, Volume and Issue: 135, P. 104119 - 104119
Published: Jan. 10, 2022
Language: Английский
Citations
85Neural Computing and Applications, Journal Year: 2022, Volume and Issue: 34(21), P. 18289 - 18324
Published: Aug. 7, 2022
Language: Английский
Citations
76Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, Journal Year: 2020, Volume and Issue: 35(2)
Published: Dec. 3, 2020
Deep learning object detection algorithms have proven their capacity to identify a variety of objects from images and videos in near real-time speed. The construction industry can potentially benefit this machine intelligence by linking with automatically analyze productivity monitor activities safety perspective. However, an effective image data set machines for training deep is not currently available due the limited accessibility images, time-and-labor-intensiveness manual annotations, knowledge base required terms both learning. This research presents case study on developing specifically named Alberta Construction Image Data Set (ACID). In ACID, 10,000 belonging 10 types are manually collected annotated corresponding positions images. To validate feasibility we train using four existing algorithms, including YOLO-v3, Inception-SSD, R-FCN-ResNet101, Faster-RCNN-ResNet101. mean average precision (mAP) 83.0% 87.8% 88.8% 89.2% speed 16.7 frames per second (fps), which satisfies needs most studies field automation construction.
Language: Английский
Citations
127Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, Journal Year: 2020, Volume and Issue: 35(2)
Published: Dec. 28, 2020
Tracking construction machines in videos is a fundamental step the automated surveillance of productivity, safety, and project progress. However, existing vision-based tracking methods are not able to achieve high precision, robustness, practical processing speed simultaneously. Occlusions illumination variations on sites also prevent from obtaining optimal performance. To address these challenges, this research proposes method, called machine tracker (CMT), track multiple videos. CMT consists three main modules: detection, association, assignment. The detection module detects using deep learning algorithm YOLOv3 each frame. Then association relates results two consecutive frames, assignment produces results. In testing, achieved 93.2% object accuracy (MOTA) 86.5% precision (MOTP) with 20.8 frames per second when tested four proposed was integrated into framework analyzing excavator productivity earthmoving cycles 96.9% accuracy.
Language: Английский
Citations
85Automation in Construction, Journal Year: 2022, Volume and Issue: 138, P. 104257 - 104257
Published: April 15, 2022
Language: Английский
Citations
55Automation in Construction, Journal Year: 2022, Volume and Issue: 141, P. 104428 - 104428
Published: June 24, 2022
Language: Английский
Citations
51Automation in Construction, Journal Year: 2022, Volume and Issue: 146, P. 104702 - 104702
Published: Dec. 7, 2022
Language: Английский
Citations
49