Systematics review on artificial intelligence chatbots and ChatGPT for language learning and research from self-determination theory (SDT): what are the roles of teachers? DOI Creative Commons
Yan Li,

Xinyan Zhou,

Thomas K. F. Chiu

et al.

Interactive Learning Environments, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: unknown, P. 1 - 15

Published: Sept. 12, 2024

Language: Английский

In search of artificial intelligence (AI) literacy in teacher education: A scoping review DOI Creative Commons
Katarina Sperling, Carl-Johan Stenberg, Cormac McGrath

et al.

Computers and Education Open, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 6, P. 100169 - 100169

Published: March 15, 2024

Artificial Intelligence (AI) literacy has recently emerged on the educational agenda raising expectations teachers' and teacher educators' professional knowledge. This scoping review examines how scientific literature conceptualises AI in relation to different forms of knowledge relevant for Teacher Education (TE). The search strategy included papers proceedings from 2000- 2023 related TE as well intersection teaching. Thirty-four were analysis. Aristotelian concepts episteme (theoretical-scientific knowledge), techne (practical-productive phronesis (professional judgement) used a lens capture implicit explicit dimensions Results indicate that is globally emerging research topic education but almost absent context TE. covers many topics draws methodological approaches. Computer science exploratory teaching approaches influence type epistemic, practical, ethical Currently, not broadly addressed or captured research. Questions ethics are predominantly matter understanding technical configurations data-driven technologies. Teacher's' practical tends translate into adoption digital resources about integration EdTech By identifying several gaps, particularly concerning knowledge, this paper adds more comprehensive can contribute well-informed laying ground future

Language: Английский

Citations

62

Advancements in Generative AI: A Comprehensive Review of GANs, GPT, Autoencoders, Diffusion Model, and Transformers DOI Creative Commons
Staphord Bengesi,

Hoda El-Sayed,

Md Kamruzzaman Sarker

et al.

IEEE Access, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 12, P. 69812 - 69837

Published: Jan. 1, 2024

Language: Английский

Citations

54

A classification tool to foster self-regulated learning with generative artificial intelligence by applying self-determination theory: a case of ChatGPT DOI Creative Commons
Thomas K. F. Chiu

Educational Technology Research and Development, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: unknown

Published: April 1, 2024

Abstract Generative AI such as ChatGPT provides an instant and individualized learning environment, may have the potential to motivate student self-regulated (SRL), more effectively than other non-AI technologies. However, impact of on motivation, SRL, needs satisfaction is unclear. Motivation SRL process can be explained using self-determination theory (SDT) three phases forethought, performance, self-reflection, respectively. Accordingly, a Delphi design was employed in this study determine how ChatGPT-based activities satisfy students’ each SDT need, foster phase from teacher perspective. We involved 36 school teachers with extensive expertise technology enhanced develop classification tool for that affect ChatGPT. collaborated rounds investigate identify activities, we revised labels, descriptions, explanations. The major finding 20 developed. suggests better SDT-based needs, fosters phrases. This assist researchers replicating, implementing, integrating successful education research development projects. inspire modify generative their own teaching, inform policymakers guidelines education.

Language: Английский

Citations

36

Higher Education’s Generative Artificial Intelligence Paradox: The Meaning of Chatbot Mania DOI Open Access

Juergen Rudolph,

Fadhil Mohamed Mohamed Ismail,

Ştefan Popenici

et al.

Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 21(06)

Published: April 19, 2024

Higher education is currently under a significant transformation due to the emergence of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) technologies, hype surrounding GenAI and increasing influence educational technology business groups over tertiary education. This commentary, prepared for Special Issue Journal University Teaching & Learning Practice (JUTLP) on “Enhancing student engagement using Artificial Intelligence (AI) chatbots,” delves into complex landscape opportunities threats that AI chatbots, including ChatGPT, introduce realm higher We argue while offers promise in enhancing pedagogy, research, administration, support, concerns around academic integrity, labour displacement, embedded biases, environmental sustainability, increased commercialisation, regulatory gaps necessitate critical approach. Our commentary advocates development literacy among educators students, emphasising necessity foster an environment responsible innovation informed use AI. posit successful integration must be grounded principles ethics, equity, prioritisation aims human values. By offering nuanced exploration these issues, our contribute ongoing discourse how institutions can navigate rise GenAI, ensuring technological advancements benefit all stakeholders upholding core

Language: Английский

Citations

33

Generative Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education: Exploring Ways of Harnessing Pedagogical Practices with the Assistance of ChatGPT DOI Creative Commons
Κλεοπάτρα Νικολοπούλου

Deleted Journal, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 1(2), P. 103 - 111

Published: March 20, 2024

There is a growing interest in using generative artificial intelligence (AI) for educational purposes within the higher education environments, while AI applications (such as ChatGPT) can transform traditional teaching and learning methods. ChatGPT an advanced tool that generates new content human-like responses. The purpose of this paper to use research assistant order explore ways be harnessed enhance pedagogical practices education. This qualitative study, which output-responses generated by provided starting point investigation. various including personalized learning, automated assessment feedback generation, virtual assistants chatbots, creation, resource recommendation, time management, language translation support, assistance, simulations labs. Other affordances strengthen experience regard collaboration communication, accessibility inclusivity, well literacy. When implementing tools such education, ethical considerations (e.g., data privacy, transparency, accessibility, cultural sensitivity), potential misuses concerns need also addressed. Although aid generation content-ideas further exploration, it complementary-supportive tool, its output necessitates human evaluation review. integration other process/practices has implications educators, students, design curricula, university policy makers. Received: 17 January 2024 | Revised: 27 February Accepted: 19 March Conflicts Interest author declares she no conflicts work. Data Availability Statement sharing not applicable article were created or analyzed study.

Language: Английский

Citations

30

A scoping review on how generative artificial intelligence transforms assessment in higher education DOI Creative Commons
Qi Xia, Xiaojing Weng, Fan Ouyang

et al.

International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 21(1)

Published: May 23, 2024

Abstract Generative artificial intelligence provides both opportunities and challenges for higher education. Existing literature has not properly investigated how this technology would impact assessment in This scoping review took a forward-thinking approach to investigate generative transforms We used the PRISMA extension reviews select articles report results. In screening, we retrieved 969 selected 32 empirical studies analysis. Most of were published 2023. three levels—students, teachers, institutions—to analyses articles. Our results suggested that should be transformed cultivate students’ self-regulated learning skills, responsible learning, integrity. To successfully transform education, (i) teacher professional development activities assessment, AI, digital literacy provided, (ii) teachers’ beliefs about human AI strengthened, (iii) teachers innovative holistic their teaching reflect transformation. Educational institutions are recommended rethink policies, as well provide more inter-disciplinary programs teaching.

Language: Английский

Citations

30

A Human-Centered Learning and Teaching Framework Using Generative Artificial Intelligence for Self-Regulated Learning Development Through Domain Knowledge Learning in K–12 Settings DOI Creative Commons
Siu Cheung Kong, Yin Yang

IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 17, P. 1588 - 1599

Published: Jan. 1, 2024

The advent of generative artificial intelligence (AI) has ignited an increase in discussions about AI tools education. In this study, a human-centred learning and teaching framework (HCLTF) that uses for self-regulated development through domain knowledge was proposed to catalyse changes educational practices. illustrates how can revolutionise practices transform the processes become human-centred. It emphasises evolving roles teachers, who increasingly skilful facilitators humanistic storytellers craft differentiated instructions attempt develop students' individualised learning. Drawing upon insights from neuroscience, guides students employ augment their attentiveness, stimulate active engagement learning, receive immediate feedback, encourage self-reflection. pedagogical approach is also reimagined; teachers equipped with literacy refine strategies better equip meet future challenges. practical application demonstrated case study involving Chinese language writing ability among primary within K–12 context. This paper reports results 60-hour programme teachers. Specifically, providing in-service cases helped them understand concepts integrate into increased perceived design AI-integrated courses would enhance attention, engagement, confidence, satisfaction.

Language: Английский

Citations

26

Developing a holistic AI literacy assessment matrix – Bridging generic, domain-specific, and ethical competencies DOI Creative Commons
Nils Knoth,

Marie Decker,

Matthias Carl Laupichler

et al.

Computers and Education Open, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 6, P. 100177 - 100177

Published: April 10, 2024

Motivated by a holistic understanding of AI literacy, this work presents an interdisciplinary effort to make literacy measurable in comprehensive way, considering generic and domain-specific as well ethics. While many assessment tools have been developed the last 2-3 years, mostly form self-assessment scales less frequently knowledge-based assessments, previous approaches only accounted for one specific area competence, namely cognitive aspects within literacy. Considering demand development different professional domains reflecting on concept competence way that goes beyond mere conceptual knowledge, there is urgent need methods capture each three dimensions cognition, behavior, attitude. In addition, competencies ethics are becoming more apparent, which further calls very matter. This paper aims provide foundation upon future instruments can be built provides insights into what framework item might look like addresses both measures than just knowledge-related based approach.

Language: Английский

Citations

19

Will generative AI replace teachers in higher education? A study of teacher and student perceptions DOI
Cecilia Ka Yuk Chan,

Louisa H.Y. Tsi

Studies In Educational Evaluation, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 83, P. 101395 - 101395

Published: Aug. 29, 2024

Language: Английский

Citations

15

Higher education students’ perceptions of ChatGPT: A global study of early reactions DOI Creative Commons
Dejan Ravšelj, Damijana Keržič, Nina Tomaževič

et al.

PLoS ONE, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: 20(2), P. e0315011 - e0315011

Published: Feb. 5, 2025

The paper presents the most comprehensive and large-scale global study to date on how higher education students perceived use of ChatGPT in early 2024. With a sample 23,218 from 109 countries territories, reveals that primarily used for brainstorming, summarizing texts, finding research articles, with few using it professional creative writing. They found useful simplifying complex information content, but less reliable providing supporting classroom learning, though some considered its clearer than peers teachers. Moreover, agreed need AI regulations at all levels due concerns about promoting cheating, plagiarism, social isolation. However, they believed could potentially enhance their access knowledge improve learning experience, efficiency, chances achieving good grades. While was as effective improving literacy, digital communication, content creation skills, interpersonal decision-making, numeracy, native language proficiency, development critical thinking skills. Students also felt would boost demand AI-related skills facilitate remote work without significantly impacting unemployment. Emotionally, mostly positive ChatGPT, curiosity calmness being common emotions. Further examinations reveal variations students' perceptions across different socio-demographic geographic factors, key factors influencing identified. Higher institutions' managers teachers may benefit these findings while formulating curricula instructions/regulations use, well when designing teaching methods assessment tools. policymakers consider strategies secondary system development, especially light changing labor market needs related development.

Language: Английский

Citations

6