
Computers and Education Artificial Intelligence, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: unknown, P. 100402 - 100402
Published: April 1, 2025
Language: Английский
Computers and Education Artificial Intelligence, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: unknown, P. 100402 - 100402
Published: April 1, 2025
Language: Английский
Education Sciences, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: 15(2), P. 174 - 174
Published: Feb. 2, 2025
The emergence of generative artificial intelligence (Gen AI) in education offers both opportunities and challenges, particularly the context student assessment. This study examines faculty members’ motivations to redesign assessments for their courses Gen AI era introduces a framework this purpose. A qualitative methodology was employed, gathering data through semi-structured interviews focus groups, along with examples redesigned assessments. Sixty-one members participated study, were analyzed using deductive inductive thematic approaches. Key redesigning included maintaining academic integrity, preparing learners future careers, adapting technological advancements, aligning institutional policies. However, also highlighted significant such as need professional development addressing equity accessibility concerns. findings identified various innovative assessment approaches tailored requirements era. Based on these insights, developed conceptual titled “Against, Avoid, Adopt, Explore”. Future research is needed validate further refine its application educational contexts.
Language: Английский
Citations
1European Journal of Education, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: 60(1)
Published: Jan. 27, 2025
ABSTRACT The acceptance of artificial intelligence (AI) in academic settings, particularly the context research creativity, is a growing area interest. This study aimed to design and validate AI Acceptance Research Creativity Scale (AIA&RCS) among faculty members. exploratory mixed‐method was conducted 720 A literature review participant interviews were qualitative phase generate develop items. In quantitative phase, face validity, content construct convergent validity reliability (internal consistency stability) used. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) indicated 4‐factor model scale with ‘perceived usefulness effectiveness creativity’, ‘ethical issues research’, ‘trusted capabilities’ ‘willingness use AI’ accounting for 51.6% variance. arrangement verified by confirmatory (CFA), fit indices that at suitable levels. Then, network took into account four‐factor structure AIA&RCS further. Similarly, graph (EGA) configuration AIA&RCS. 25‐item well‐suited measuring innovation because its psychometrics.
Language: Английский
Citations
0Journal of Baltic Science Education, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: 24(1), P. 4 - 6
Published: Feb. 25, 2025
Higher education appears to be undergoing the most significant transformations due integration of artificial intelligence into teaching, learning, feedback provision, assessment, writing, and growing role AI in student research. Several aspects have already been studied, such as institutional adoption policies guidelines (Jin et al., 2025), Intelligent Tutoring Systems, Automated Assessment Feedback (Ramadhan 2024). On other hand, certain topics, deepfakes their consequences for remain underexplored. Deepfakes refer use create media—such photos, audio, video content—that authentic but is, reality, artificially generated.
Language: Английский
Citations
0EIKI Journal of Effective Teaching Methods, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: 3(1)
Published: March 17, 2025
Higher Education is experiencing substantial transformations as Artificial Intelligence (AI) redefines academic and administrative operations. This paper examines AI’s paradigm-shifting influence on Institutions (HEIs), emphasizing its contribution to improving pedagogical processes optimizing efficacy. Using a structured methodology, this study’s thematic analysis highlights key areas where AI making an impact. addresses the positive aspects of using in teaching practices learning process, crucial role writing papers, effects honesty, implementation work, responsibilities faced by education leaders landscape, link between digital divide higher institutions. Further studies may focus comparative research among diverse institutions different regions, leadership strategies that facilitate integration HEIs, techniques enhance literacy teachers, staff, students.
Language: Английский
Citations
0AI & Society, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: unknown
Published: March 22, 2025
Language: Английский
Citations
0IGI Global eBooks, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: unknown, P. 275 - 292
Published: April 9, 2025
This work focuses on improving reading and writing skills in university academic contexts that favour the development of digital, media competences. In this sense, professional abilities require an effort engagement acquired by students through performance oral, written audiovisual comprehension production activities linked to area knowledge where they develop defend their Final Degree Project. For purpose, active-participatory methodology has been selected, consisting different based game-based learning such as: escape rooms, textual creation platforms, educational experiences artificial intelligence, among others. design structured three blocks characterised identification previous knowledge, literacy formative processes elaboration texts for final evaluation.
Language: Английский
Citations
0Education and Information Technologies, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: unknown
Published: April 10, 2025
Language: Английский
Citations
0Social Sciences & Humanities Open, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: 11, P. 101310 - 101310
Published: Jan. 1, 2025
Language: Английский
Citations
0European Journal Of Dental Education, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: unknown
Published: Feb. 13, 2025
ABSTRACT Introduction The introduction highlights the transformative impact of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) on higher education (HE), emphasising its potential to enhance student learning and instructor efficiency while also addressing significant challenges such as accuracy, privacy, ethical concerns. By exploring benefits risks AI integration, underscores urgent need for evidence‐based, inclusive, adaptable frameworks guide universities in leveraging GenAI responsibly effectively academic environments. Aims This paper presents a comprehensive process developing cross‐disciplinary consensus‐based guidelines, based latest evidence integration at European University Cyprus (EUC). In response rapid adoption tools LLMs HE, task group EUC created structured framework effective use academia, one that was intended be flexible enough incorporate new developments not infringe instructors' freedoms, practical Results development informed by extensive literature reviews consultations. Key pillars include: opportunities presented GenAI; promoting transparent communication; ensuring responsible students educators; safeguarding integrity. guidelines emphasise balance between, hand, educational experiences, and, other maintaining critical thinking originality. includes recommendations usage, classroom policy formulation, augments rather than replaces human judgement settings. Conclusions iterative process, including refining illustrates hands‐on approach resulting may serve model institutions (HEIs) aiming integrate upholding quality standards.
Language: Английский
Citations
0Innovations in Education and Teaching International, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: unknown, P. 1 - 14
Published: March 25, 2025
Language: Английский
Citations
0