Embedding community-engaged research principles in implementation science: The implementation science center for cancer control equity
Journal of Clinical and Translational Science,
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
7(1)
Published: Jan. 1, 2023
Gaps
in
the
implementation
of
effective
interventions
impact
nearly
all
cancer
prevention
and
control
strategies
US
including
Massachusetts.
To
close
these
gaps,
evidence-based
must
be
rapidly
equitably
implemented
settings
serving
racially,
ethnically,
socioeconomically,
geographically
diverse
populations.
This
paper
provides
a
brief
overview
The
Implementation
Science
Center
for
Cancer
Control
Equity
(ISCCCE)
describes
how
we
have
operationalized
our
commitment
to
robust
community-engaged
center
that
aims
gaps.
We
describe
ISCCCE
is
organized
principles
research
are
embedded
across
center.
Principles
community
engagement
been
components
ISCCCE.
intentionally
integrated
throughout
structures
processes
developed
evaluation
assess
whether
quality
partnerships
reflects
principles.
comprehensive
infrastructure
studying
efficient,
pragmatic,
equity-focused
adaptation
historically
currently
disadvantaged
communities
with
built-in
methods
evaluate
engagement.
engaged
designed
maximize
relevance
on
health
centers.
Language: Английский
Adaptation of the brainwriting premortem technique to inform the co-creation of COVID-19 testing strategies in underserved communities in South San Diego
Borsika A. Rabin,
No information about this author
Kelli L. Cain,
No information about this author
Lawrence O. Ayers
No information about this author
et al.
BMC Health Services Research,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
24(1)
Published: Jan. 3, 2024
Abstract
Introduction
Meaningful
engagement
of
partners
in
co-creating
and
refining
health-related
programs
can
increase
the
initial
uptake,
sustained
implementation,
broad
reach,
effectiveness
these
programs.
This
is
especially
important
for
underserved
communities
where
resources
are
limited
need
to
be
prioritized.
Brainwriting
premortem
a
novel
qualitative
approach
partner
that
combines
strengths
individual
idea
generation
with
concept
exercise
addresses
failure
points
prior
implementation
new
Methods
An
adapted
form
brainwriting
was
used
inform
iterative
refinements
COVID-19
testing
program
at
Federally
Qualified
Health
Center
(FQHC)
San
Diego.
Patients
providers
from
FQHC
participated
interviews
two
time
(early-
mid-implementation
program).
Interview
data
were
transcribed,
translated,
analyzed
using
rapid
approach.
Key
themes
sub-themes
identified
program.
Results
A
total
11
patients
(7
Spanish-
4
English-speaking)
8
interviews.
related
possible
reasons
failure:
advertising/sharing
information;
access
testing;
handling
test
results;
staff
patient
safety;
beliefs
views
regarding
SARS-CoV-2
virus;
options
offered.
Proposed
solutions
offered
key
failures
except
virus.
Additional
education,
physical
operations,
recruitment
strategies.
Real-time
changes
flow
components
made
response
7
suggestions
providers.
Changes
process
returning
results
most
common,
included
sending
via
email
distinct
workflows
based
on
result.
Conclusion
The
technique
allowed
us
incorporate
perspective
delivery
refinement
an
effective
tool
context
promising
input
ensure
successful
implementation.
Future
studies,
particularly
those
requiring
public
health
emergencies,
should
consider
use
this
technique.
Language: Английский
Community advisory boards as implementation strategies to center partner and patient voice in community health centers
Rebekka M. Lee,
No information about this author
Kamini Mallick,
No information about this author
James G. Daly
No information about this author
et al.
Journal of Clinical and Translational Science,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
9(1)
Published: Dec. 18, 2024
Community
advisory
boards
(CABs)
are
a
promising
approach
for
strengthening
patient
and
partner
voices
in
community
health
center
(CHC)
evidence-based
decision-making.
This
paper
aims
to
describe
how
CHCs
used
CABs
during
the
COVID-19
pandemic
improve
reach
of
testing
among
populations
experiencing
disparities
identify
transferable
lessons
future
implementation.
mixed
methods
study
integrates
brief
quantitative
surveys
engagement
(N
=
20)
one-on-one
qualitative
interviews
13)
staff
partners
engaged
CHC
with
cost
analysis
feedback
from
participating
an
online
learning
17).
reported
high
ratings
engagement,
all
mean
principles
above
4
("very
good"
or
"often")
out
5.
Qualitative
findings
provided
more
in-depth
understanding
experiences
serving
on
CAB
highlighted
such
as
trust
mutual
respect
were
reflected
practices.
We
developed
toolkit
strategies
governance
prioritization,
estimates
ensure
sustainment,
guidance
integrating
quality
improvement
expertise,
testimonies
members
benefits
joining,
template
agendas
facilitator
training
meeting
success.
In
alignment
Translational
Science
Benefits
Model,
this
expands
research
impact
through
comprehensive
measurement
by
transforming
into
action-orientated
guide
implement
decision-making
public
impact.
Language: Английский
Data sharing in the context of community-engaged research partnerships
Social Science & Medicine,
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
325, P. 115895 - 115895
Published: April 11, 2023
Over
the
past
20
years,
National
Institutes
for
Health
(NIH)
has
implemented
several
policies
designed
to
improve
sharing
of
research
data,
such
as
NIH
public
access
policy
publications,
genomic
data
policy,
and
Cancer
Institute
(NCI)
Moonshot
policy.
In
January
2023,
a
new
gone
into
effect,
requiring
researchers
submit
Data
Management
Sharing
Plan
in
proposals
funding
(NIH.
Supplemental
information
the,
2020b;
NIH.
Final
2020a).
These
are
based
on
idea
that
is
key
component
scientific
method,
it
enables
creation
larger
repositories
can
lead
questions
may
not
be
possible
individual
studies
(Alter
Gonzalez,
2018;
Jwa
Poldrack,
2022),
allows
enhanced
collaboration,
maximizes
federal
investment
research.
Important
we
must
consider
expanded
whom
do
benefits
accrue
accrue?
an
era
growing
efforts
engage
diverse
communities
research,
impact
all
participants
they
represent.
We
examine
issue
through
community-engaged
lens,
informed
by
long-standing
partnership
between
community
health
organization
(Kruse
et
al.,
2022).
contend
without
effective
engagement
rich
contextual
knowledge,
biases
resulting
from
remain
unchecked.
provide
recommendations
would
allow
better
related
ensure
both
researcher
understanding
issues
involved
move
toward
shared
benefits.
By
identifying
good
models
evaluating
contribute
then
using
those
systematically,
will
advance
consideration
perspective
increase
likelihood
all.
Language: Английский
Mobile Health Services for COVID-19: Counseling, Testing, and Vaccination for Medically Underserved Populations
Priya S. Gupta,
No information about this author
Amir M. Mohareb,
No information about this author
Christine Valdes
No information about this author
et al.
American Journal of Public Health,
Journal Year:
2022,
Volume and Issue:
112(11), P. 1556 - 1559
Published: Oct. 12, 2022
Mobile
health
units
can
improve
access
to
preventive
services,
especially
for
medically
underserved
populations.
However,
there
is
little
published
experience
of
mobile
being
used
expand
COVID-19
vaccination.
In
concert
with
local
public
departments
and
community
members,
we
implemented
a
unit
deployed
it
12
predominantly
low-income
racial/ethnic
minority
communities
in
Massachusetts.
We
describe
the
success
challenges
this
innovative
program
expanding
(Am
J
Public
Health.
2022;112(11):1556-1559.
https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2022.307021).
Language: Английский
Challenges and recommendations for measuring time devoted to implementation and intervention activities in health equity-focused, resource-constrained settings: a qualitative analysis
Implementation Science Communications,
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
4(1)
Published: Sept. 1, 2023
There
is
little
guidance
for
conducting
health
equity-focused
economic
evaluations
of
evidence-based
practices
in
resource-constrained
settings,
particularly
with
respect
to
staff
time
use.
Investigators
must
balance
the
need
low-touch,
non-disruptive
cost
data
collection
on
providing
services
priority
subpopulations.This
investigation
took
place
within
a
pilot
study
examining
implementation
bundled
screening
intervention
combining
social
determinants
and
colorectal
cancer
at
four
federally
qualified
centers
(FQHCs)
Boston
metropolitan
area.
Methods
collecting
personnel
costs
activities,
including
passive
(automatic)
active
(non-automatic,
requiring
effort)
collection,
as
well
three
alternate
wordings
self-reporting
time-use,
were
evaluated
qualitatively
using
collected
through
interviews
FQHC
(including
clinicians,
population
staff,
community
workers)
assessments
completeness.Passive
methods
simple
execute
resulted
no
missing
data,
but
missed
activities
that
outside
planned
meetings.
Active
spreadsheets
was
users
when
applied
care
processes
already
tracked
this
fashion
yielded
accurate
use
data.
However,
tasks
where
not
typical,
broken
up
over
multiple
sessions,
more
challenging
Questions
asking
about
typical
rather
than
specific
period,
patients,
most
reliable
actionable
Still,
even
best-performing
question
had
substantial
variability
estimates.
Participants
noted
patient
characteristics
interest
research,
language
spoken,
adverse
health,
issues
related
poverty
or
mental
all
contributed
significantly
variability.Passively
are
least
burdensome
should
be
pursued
research
efforts
possible,
accompanied
by
qualitative
ensure
an
reflection
effort.
When
workflows
these
also
strong
methods.
Self-reported
will
questions
inquire
"typical"
types
patients.
Language: Английский
The opinions of community-centered engagement and health care during and after COVID-19 pandemic
Li-Jie Du
No information about this author
Frontiers in Psychiatry,
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
14
Published: May 5, 2023
OPINION
article
Front.
Psychiatry,
05
May
2023Sec.
Public
Mental
Health
Volume
14
-
2023
|
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1168860
Language: Английский
Bundling Colorectal Cancer Screening Outreach with Screening for Social Risk in Federally Qualified Health Centers: A Stepped-Wedge Implementation-Effectiveness Study
Gina Kruse,
No information about this author
Sanja Percac‐Lima,
No information about this author
Marjanna E. Barber-Dubois
No information about this author
et al.
Journal of General Internal Medicine,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
39(7), P. 1188 - 1195
Published: Feb. 8, 2024
Abstract
Background
Bundling
is
combining
individual
interventions
to
meet
quality
metrics.
offers
of
cancer
screening
with
for
social
determinants
health
(SDOH)
may
enable
centers
assist
patients
risks
and
yield
efficiencies.
Objective
To
measure
effects
bundling
fecal
immunochemical
testing
(FIT)
SDOH
in
federally
qualified
(FQHCs).
Design
Clustered
stepped-wedge
trial.
Participants
Four
Massachusetts
FQHCs
randomized
implement
bundled
FIT-SDOH
over
8-week
“steps.”
Intervention
Outreach
50–75-year-olds
overdue
CRC
offer
FIT
screening.
The
implementation
strategy
used
facilitation
training
data
monitoring
reporting.
Main
Measures
Implementation
process
descriptions,
from
meetings,
rates.
Rates
were
compared
between
control
each
“step”
by
fitting
generalized
linear
mixed-effects
models
random
intercepts
FQHCs,
patients,
FQHC.
Key
Results
tailored
processes
their
infrastructure,
workflows,
staffing
prioritized
different
groups
outreach.
Two
population
outreach,
two
integrated
within
established
programs,
such
as
pre-visit
planning.
Of
34,588
screening,
54%
female;
20%
Black,
11%
Latino,
10%
Asian,
47%
white;
32%
had
Medicaid,
16%
Medicare,
private
insurance,
uninsured.
Odds
completion
“steps”
controls
higher
overall
among
outreach
(overall:
adjusted
odds
ratio
(aOR)
2.41,
p
=
0.005;
prioritized:
aOR
2.88,
0.002).
did
not
differ
across
Conclusions
As
healthcare
systems
are
required
conduct
more
screenings,
it
notable
that
a
long-standing
requirement
increased
even
when
newer
requirement.
This
was
feasible
real-world
safety-net
clinical
conserve
resources,
especially
complex
or
intensive
strategies.
Clinical
Trials
Registration
NCT04585919
Language: Английский
A Federally Qualified Health Center-led Ethics & Equity Framework & Workflow Checklist: An Invited Commentary in Response to a Relational Public Health Framing of FQHCs During COVID-19
The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
52(1), P. 41 - 44
Published: Jan. 1, 2024
With
disparate
rates
of
morbidity
and
mortality
among
minoritized
communities,
COVID-19
illuminated
the
need
for
equity-informed
practices
in
public
health.
Pacia
et
al
posit
FQHCs
as
entities
that
addressed
inequity
when
others
failed.
This
commentary
further
situates
how
address
health
crisis
institutional
racism
related
inequities
every
day
presents
a
FQHC-led
Ethics
Equity
Framework
Workflow
Checklist
to
guide
ethical
equitable
engagement
with
FQHCs.
Language: Английский
Adapting the Evidence Academy model for virtual stakeholder engagement in a national setting during the COVID-19 pandemic
Journal of Clinical and Translational Science,
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
7(1)
Published: Jan. 1, 2023
Abstract
The
COVID-19
pandemic
raised
the
importance
of
adaptive
capacity
and
preparedness
when
engaging
historically
marginalized
populations
in
research
practice.
Rapid
Acceleration
Diagnostics
Underserved
Populations’
Equity
Evidence
Academy
Series
(RADx-UP
EA)
is
a
virtual,
national,
interactive
conference
model
designed
to
support
engage
community-academic
partnerships
collaborative
effort
improve
practices
that
overcome
disparities
SARS-CoV-2
testing
technologies.
RADx-UP
EA
promotes
information
sharing,
critical
reflection
discussion,
creation
translatable
strategies
for
health
equity.
Staff
faculty
from
Coordination
Data
Collection
Center
developed
three
events
with
diverse
geographic,
racial,
ethnic
representation
attendees
project
teams:
February
2021
(n
=
319);
November
242);
September
2022
254).
Each
event
included
data
profile;
2-day,
virtual
event;
summary
report;
community
dissemination
product;
an
evaluation
strategy.
Operational
translational
delivery
processes
were
iteratively
adapted
each
across
one
or
more
five
domains:
assets,
knowledge
learning,
social
organization,
flexibility,
innovation.
can
be
generalized
beyond
tailored
by
academic
input
respond
local
national
emergencies.
Language: Английский