Science Advances,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
11(9)
Published: Feb. 28, 2025
How
cyclin-dependent
kinase
7
(CDK7)
coordinately
regulates
the
cell
cycle
and
RNA
polymerase
II
transcription
remains
unclear.
Here,
high-resolution
cryo–electron
microscopy
revealed
how
two
clinically
relevant
inhibitors
block
CDK7
function.
In
cells,
inhibition
rapidly
suppressed
transcription,
but
constitutively
active
genes
were
disproportionately
affected
versus
stimulus-responsive.
Distinct
factors
(TFs)
regulate
constitutive
stimulus-responsive
genes.
Accordingly,
TFs
refractory
to
whereas
“core”
repressed.
Core
(n
=
78)
are
predominantly
promoter
associated
control
proliferative
gene
expression
programs
across
types.
Mechanistically,
rapid
suppression
of
core
TF
function
can
occur
through
CDK7-dependent
phosphorylation
changes
in
RB1.
Moreover,
depleted
protein
levels
within
hours,
consistent
with
durable
target
suppression.
Thus,
a
major
unappreciated
biological
for
is
regulation
cohort
that
drives
proliferation,
revealing
an
apparent
universal
mechanism
by
which
coordinates
RNAPII
CDK
regulation.
Cancer Discovery,
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
14(3), P. 446 - 467
Published: Dec. 1, 2023
Cyclin-dependent
kinase
2
(CDK2)
is
thought
to
play
an
important
role
in
driving
proliferation
of
certain
cancers,
including
those
harboring
CCNE1
amplification
and
breast
cancers
that
have
acquired
resistance
CDK4/6
inhibitors
(CDK4/6i).
The
precise
impact
pharmacologic
inhibition
CDK2
not
known
due
the
lack
selective
inhibitors.
Here
we
describe
INX-315,
a
novel
potent
inhibitor
with
high
selectivity
over
other
CDK
family
members.
Using
cell-based
assays,
patient-derived
xenografts
(PDX),
transgenic
mouse
models,
show
INX-315
(i)
promotes
retinoblastoma
protein
hypophosphorylation
therapy-induced
senescence
(TIS)
CCNE1-amplified
tumors,
leading
durable
control
tumor
growth;
(ii)
overcomes
cancer
CDK4/6i,
restoring
cell
cycle
while
reinstating
chromatin
architecture
CDK4/6i-induced
TIS;
(iii)
delays
onset
CDK4/6i
by
deeper
suppression
E2F
targets.
Our
results
support
clinical
development
novel,
CDK2.
preclinical
studies
demonstrate
activity
for
both
CDK4/6i-resistant
cancer.
In
each
case,
induces
arrest
phenotype
resembling
cellular
senescence.
data
trials.
See
related
commentary
Watts
Spencer,
p.
386.
This
article
featured
Selected
Articles
from
Issue,
384.
Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
196, P. 104324 - 104324
Published: March 8, 2024
Aberrant
cyclin-dependent
kinase
2
(CDK2)
activation
has
been
identified
as
a
main
resistance
mechanism
to
CDK4/6
inhibition
in
hormone-receptor
positive
(HR+)
breast
cancer.
Additionally,
consistent
preclinical
evidence
states
its
crucial
role
MYC
and
CCNE1
overexpressed
cancer
survival,
such
triple-negative
cancers
(TNBC),
thus
representing
an
appealing
relatively
unexplored
target
treatment
opportunity.
Despite
emerging
initial
results
of
novel
CDK2
inhibitors
(CDK2i)
activity,
comprehensive
outcomes
collection
is
currently
absent
from
the
scientific
literature.
We
aim
provide
overview
ongoing
clinical
trials
involving
CDK2i
context
metastatic
(mBC),
either
monotherapy
or
combination
with
other
agents.
The
review
extends
beyond
encompass
CDK4
inhibitors,
combined
CDK2/4/6
well-known
pan-CDK
including
those
specifically
directed
at
CDK2.
Delving
into
results,
we
critically
appraise
observed
efficacy
offer
valuable
insights
their
potential
impact
future
applications.
Molecular Cell,
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
83(22), P. 4047 - 4061.e6
Published: Nov. 1, 2023
CDK4/6
inhibitors
are
remarkable
anti-cancer
drugs
that
can
arrest
tumor
cells
in
G1
and
induce
their
senescence
while
causing
only
relatively
mild
toxicities
healthy
tissues.
How
they
achieve
this
mechanistically
is
unclear.
We
show
here
specifically
vulnerable
to
inhibition
because
during
the
arrest,
oncogenic
signals
drive
toxic
cell
overgrowth.
This
overgrowth
causes
permanent
cycle
withdrawal
by
either
preventing
progression
from
or
inducing
genotoxic
damage
subsequent
S-phase
mitosis.
Inhibiting
reverting
converge
onto
mTOR
rescue
excessive
growth,
DNA
damage,
exit
cancer
cells.
Conversely,
non-transformed
these
phenotypes
sensitize
inhibition.
Together,
demonstrates
growth
a
synthetic
lethal
combination
exploited
tumor-specific
toxicity.
Drug Resistance Updates,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
76, P. 101103 - 101103
Published: June 25, 2024
Cell
cycle
dysregulation
is
a
hallmark
of
cancer
that
promotes
eccessive
cell
division.
Cyclin-dependent
kinase
4
(CDK4)
and
cyclin-dependent
6
(CDK6)
are
key
molecules
in
the
G1-to-S
phase
transition
crucial
for
onset,
survival,
progression
breast
(BC).
Small-molecule
CDK4/CDK6
inhibitors
(CDK4/6i)
block
phosphorylation
tumor
suppressor
Rb
thus
restrain
susceptible
BC
cells
G1
phase.
Three
CDK4/6i
approved
first-line
treatment
patients
with
advanced/metastatic
hormone
receptor-positive
(HR
JACS Au,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
4(5), P. 1911 - 1927
Published: May 14, 2024
Cyclin-dependent
kinases
(CDKs),
particularly
CDK4
and
CDK2,
are
crucial
for
cell
cycle
progression
from
the
Gap
1
(G1)
to
Synthesis
(S)
phase
by
phosphorylating
targets
such
as
Retinoblastoma
Protein
(Rb).
CDK4,
paired
with
cyclin-D,
operates
in
long
G1
phase,
while
CDK2
cyclin-E,
manages
brief
G1-to-S
transition,
enabling
DNA
replication.
Aberrant
CDK
signaling
leads
uncontrolled
proliferation,
which
is
a
hallmark
of
cancer.
Exactly
how
they
accomplish
their
catalytic
phosphorylation
actions
distinct
efficiencies
poses
fundamental,
albeit
overlooked
question.
Here
we
combined
available
experimental
data
modeling
active
complexes
establish
conformational
functional
landscapes
explain
two
cyclin/CDK
differentially
populate
catalytically
competent
states
progression.
Our
premise
that
could
be
more
important
than
cyclin-CDK
biochemical
binding
specificity
efficiency
likely
prime
determinant
We
observe
dynamic
ATP
site,
regulatory
spine,
interaction
its
cyclin
partner.
The
N-terminus
cyclin-D
acts
an
allosteric
regulator
activation
loop
ATP-binding
site
CDK4.
Integrated
suite
data,
suggest
complex
less
capable
remaining
conformation,
may
have
lower
befitting
time
scales,
point
critical
residues
motifs
drive
differences.
mechanistic
landscape
apply
broadly
kinases,
propose
drug
design
strategies:
(i)
Inhibition
stabilization
targeting
regulation
(ii)
entropy-optimized
leverages
dynamic,
entropic
aspects
optimize
efficacy.
Cancer Drug Resistance,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
unknown
Published: Jan. 22, 2025
This
review
offers
an
expert
perspective
on
biomarkers,
CDK4/6
inhibitor
efficacy,
and
therapeutic
approaches
for
managing
hormone
receptor-positive
(HR+),
human
epidermal
growth
factor
receptor-negative
(HER2-)
advanced
breast
cancer
(ABC),
particularly
after
progression.
Key
trials
have
demonstrated
that
combining
inhibitors
with
endocrine
therapy
(ET)
significantly
improves
progression-free
survival
(PFS),
median
durations
ranging
from
14.8
to
26.7
months,
overall
(OS),
reaching
up
53.7
months.
Actionable
such
as
PIK3CA
ESR1
mutations,
emerged
pivotal
tools
guide
second-line
treatment
decisions,
enabling
the
use
of
targeted
therapies
like
alpelisib
elacestrant
emphasizing
important
role
biomarkers
in
guiding
selection
therapy.
overview
aims
provide
clinicians
a
practical
up-to-date
framework
inform
decisions
improve
patient
care
context
this
challenging
disease.
Additionally,
we
emerging
novel
strategies
address
difficult
clinical
landscape.
The
combination
of
CDK4/6
inhibitors
(CDK4/6i)
and
endocrine
therapy
has
revolutionized
treatment
for
hormone
receptor-positive
(HR+)
metastatic
breast
cancer.
However,
the
emergence
resistance
in
most
patients
often
leads
to
discontinuation
with
no
consensus
on
effective
second-line
therapies.
therapeutic
benefits
maintaining
CDK4/6i
or
incorporating
CDK2
(CDK2i)
after
disease
progression
remain
unclear.
Here,
we
demonstrate
that
sustained
therapy,
either
alone
combined
CDK2i,
significantly
suppresses
growth
drug-resistant
HR
+
Continued
induces
a
non-canonical
pathway
retinoblastoma
protein
(Rb)
inactivation
via
post-translational
degradation,
resulting
diminished
E2F
activity
delayed
G1
progression.
Importantly,
our
data
highlight
CDK2i
should
be
effectively
suppress
overcome
resistance.
We
also
identify
cyclin
E
overexpression
as
key
driver
inhibition.
These
findings
provide
crucial
insights
into
overcoming
cancer,
supporting
continued
use
strategic
incorporation
improve
outcomes.
Nature,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
unknown
Published: March 19, 2025
Abstract
In
the
course
of
antibody
affinity
maturation,
germinal
centre
(GC)
B
cells
mutate
their
immunoglobulin
heavy-
and
light-chain
genes
in
a
process
known
as
somatic
hypermutation
(SHM)
1–4
.
Panels
mutant
with
different
binding
affinities
for
antigens
are
then
selected
Darwinian
manner,
which
leads
to
progressive
increase
among
population
5
As
any
process,
rare
gain-of-fitness
mutations
must
be
identified
common
loss-of-fitness
avoided
6
Progressive
acquisition
therefore
poses
risk
during
large
proliferative
bursts
7
,
when
GC
undergo
several
cell
cycles
absence
affinity-based
selection
8–13
Using
combination
vivo
mouse
experiments
mathematical
modelling,
here
we
show
that
GCs
achieve
this
balance
by
strongly
suppressing
SHM
clonal-burst-type
expansion,
so
fraction
progeny
generated
these
does
not
deviate
from
ancestral
genotype.
Intravital
imaging
image-based
sorting
strain
carrying
reporter
cyclin-dependent
kinase
2
(CDK2)
activity
showed
actively
undergoing
lack
transient
CDK2
low
‘G0-like’
phase
cycle
takes
place.
We
propose
model
inertially
cycling
mostly
delay
until
G0-like
follows
final
round
division
dark
zone,
thus
maintaining
they
clonally
expand
selection.
Nature Communications,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
15(1)
Published: Aug. 8, 2024
Enhancer
of
zeste
homolog
2
(EZH2)
is
a
histone
methyltransferase
and
emerging
therapeutic
target
that
overexpressed
in
most
castration-resistant
prostate
cancers
implicated
as
driver
disease
progression
resistance
to
hormonal
therapies.
Here
we
define
the
lineage-specific
action
differential
activity
EZH2
both
adenocarcinoma
neuroendocrine
cancer
(NEPC)
subtypes
advanced
better
understand
role
modulating
differentiation,
lineage
plasticity,
identify
mediators
response
inhibitor
therapy.
Mechanistically,
modulates
bivalent
genes
results
upregulation
NEPC-associated
transcriptional
drivers
(e.g.,
ASCL1)
neuronal
gene
programs
NEPC,
leads
forward
differentiation
after
targeting
NEPC.
Subtype-specific
downstream
effects
inhibition
on
cell
cycle
support
potential
rationale
for
co-targeting
cyclin/CDK
overcome
inhibition.
has
been
Here,
authors
focus
two
report
how
it
thereby
leading
being
targeted
cancer.