E-Waste Wars: The Catalyst Awakens DOI Creative Commons
Emilia Paone, Francesco Mauriello

Sustainable Chemistry, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 5(4), P. 324 - 326

Published: Dec. 17, 2024

We stand at the crossroads of innovation and crisis [...]

Language: Английский

Evaluating the progress and identifying future improvement areas of mining's contribution to the sustainable development goals (SDGs) DOI Creative Commons

Yvette Baninla,

Chenyang Wang, Jian Pu

et al.

The Extractive Industries and Society, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: 23, P. 101637 - 101637

Published: March 6, 2025

Language: Английский

Citations

1
Advancing Circular Economy in Road Construction: Mechanical Performance of Second-Cycle Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement (R2AP) DOI Creative Commons
Mohd Khairul Idham Mohd Satar, ‪Mohd Rosli Hainin, Haryati Yaacob

et al.

Cleaner Waste Systems, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: unknown, P. 100249 - 100249

Published: March 1, 2025

Language: Английский

Citations

0
Navigating Consumer Behaviour in E-Waste Disposal: a Bibliometric Exploration Aligned with SDG DOI Creative Commons
Nornajihah Nadia Hasbullah, Ag Kaifah Riyard Kiflee, Mastura Roni

et al.

Journal of Lifestyle and SDGs Review, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: 5(3), P. e05364 - e05364

Published: March 10, 2025

Objective: E-waste recycling is a critical research area due to environmental issues caused by discarded electronic devices. Aligned with the Sustainable Development Goals (SDG), particularly Goal 12 (Responsible Consumption and Production) 13 (Climate Action), this study emphasizes need for sustainable e-waste management. Despite insights into publication growth impacts, gap persists in understanding how consumers manage or respond various types. This examines customer behaviour conducted from 1997 2024. Theoretical Framework: The draws upon consumer theories understand complexities of management explores patterns responses types, including functional hazardous electronics. Method: analyzes 651 papers Scopus database, spanning contributions 136 prominent publications. Using VOSviewer scientific mapping, identifies significant trends globally. Results Discussion: findings highlight countries like China, United States, India, Kingdom, Australia. Esteemed journals, Journal Cleaner Production Resources Conservation Recycling, have advanced sustainability waste research. reveals differences disposal methods categories. Functional electronics, such as computers mobile phones, are commonly donated resold, whereas products batteries major appliances require specialized their hazards. Research Implications: Understanding variances crucial promoting effective, techniques. align SDG framework, providing actionable policymakers, researchers, practitioners design targeted strategies improving practices globally while supporting responsible production climate resilience. Originality/Value: By addressing recycling, enhances management's role fostering sustainability, making contribution literature on practices.

Language: Английский

Citations

0
Wood Waste Reduction Through Volumetric Modular Building Techniques DOI Creative Commons

Colin W Taylor Jennifer M. Bond,

John Killingsworth, Jonathan W. Elliott

et al.

Cleaner Waste Systems, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: unknown, P. 100253 - 100253

Published: March 1, 2025

Language: Английский

Citations

0
Deep-sea mining and its risks for social-ecological systems: Insights from simulation-based analyses DOI Creative Commons
Lubna Alam, Kumara Perumal Pradhoshini,

R. Flint

et al.

PLoS ONE, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: 20(3), P. e0320888 - e0320888

Published: March 28, 2025

The pros and cons of deep-sea mining (DSM) is currently hotly debated. Here, we assess the environmental, economic, social risks DSM by comparing scenarios with without involvement. “Without” scenario relies solely on land-based circular economy solutions, while “With” incorporates alongside strategies, highlighting dangers heavy dependence. Through literature review expert interviews, our study identifies key risk indicators across dimensions, forming a comprehensive assessment framework. application qualitative data fuzzy cognitive mapping, analysis reveals that environmental factors are most influential (centrality: 1.46), followed (1.32) economic (1.0) factors. In “With DSM” scenario, all show increased risks, factors, particularly “coastal state vulnerability,” experiencing 13% rise. Social including “violation law,” “participatory rights,” “lack effective control,” “degraded reputation,” increase 8–11%, such as “contractual violations,” special provision,” “knowledge gap assistance fund” disputes among “multiple stakeholders,” see an 11% uptick. Our results suggest poses to marine ecosystems likely too significant justify its pursuit advocates for solutions viable alternatives mitigate social, risks. We recommend policies should promote practices through resource recovery incentives.

Language: Английский

Citations

0
Determinants of adopting web-based systems for e-waste management and ensuring sustainable environment: Evidence from Bangladesh DOI Creative Commons
Mohammad Alam, Chanchal Molla, S.M. Misbauddin

et al.

Cleaner Waste Systems, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: unknown, P. 100282 - 100282

Published: April 1, 2025

Language: Английский

Citations

0
Optimizing the e-waste management in India: a sustainable mathematical modeling approach to circular economy DOI
Wajahat Ali

Quality & Quantity, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: unknown

Published: May 19, 2025

Language: Английский

Citations

0
E-Waste Wars: The Catalyst Awakens DOI Creative Commons
Emilia Paone, Francesco Mauriello

Sustainable Chemistry, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 5(4), P. 324 - 326

Published: Dec. 17, 2024

We stand at the crossroads of innovation and crisis [...]

Language: Английский

Citations

0