Agriculture,
Journal Year:
2021,
Volume and Issue:
11(7), P. 652 - 652
Published: July 11, 2021
Socio-cultural
research
might
address
anthropocentric
reasons
for
honeybee
(Apis
mellifera)
conservation.
In
some
regions,
particular
subspecies
are
considered
to
be
native;
A.
mellifera
(“dark
bee”)
in
the
north-east
and
carnica
Island
Beskids
Poland.
Additionally,
caucasia
(often
incorrectly
called
caucasica)
Buckfast
reported
across
order
verify
actual
choice
of
beekeepers,
a
survey
on
kept
apiaries
was
conducted
annually
from
1980
2018.
This
is
way
if
conservation
management
towards
dark
bee
influenced
its
maintenance
at
sufficient
level
their
restoration.
The
analysis
revealed
that
Polish
beekeepers
know
what
“buzzing”
hives,
awareness
which
subspecies/types
they
maintain
has
grown
through
years.
Initially,
up
four
different
per
apiary,
but
now
most
have
only
one
(maximum
two).
Currently,
approach
homogeneous
share
with
exclusive
presence
subspecies.
popularity
indigenous
declined
over
time
low
now.
It
seems
new
solutions
should
increase
effectiveness
European
efforts.
Biology,
Journal Year:
2022,
Volume and Issue:
11(2), P. 233 - 233
Published: Feb. 1, 2022
The
concept
of
ecosystem
services
is
widely
understood
as
the
and
benefits
thatecosystems
provide
to
humans,
they
have
been
categorised
into
provisioning,
regulating,
supporting,
cultural
services.
This
article
aims
an
updated
overview
that
honey
bee
Apis
mellifera
provides
humans
well
ecosystems.
We
revised
role
bees
pollinators
in
natural
ecosystems
preserve
restore
local
biodiversity
wild
plants;
agro-ecosystems,
this
species
used
enhance
crop
yield
quality,
meeting
increasing
food
demand.
Beekeeping
activity
not
only
with
high-quality
but
also
substances
raw
materials
pharmaceuticals,
polluted
areas,
convey
valuable
information
on
environmental
presence
pollutants
their
impact
human
health.
Finally,
symbolic
tradition,
mysticism,
values
habitats
are
presented.
Overall,
we
suggest
value
most
important
played
by
insect
species,
it
may
help
revitalise
strengthen
intimate
reciprocal
relationship
between
world,
avoiding
inaccuracy
considering
mere
providers
humans.
Current Research in Insect Science,
Journal Year:
2022,
Volume and Issue:
2, P. 100043 - 100043
Published: Jan. 1, 2022
Worldwide,
the
use
of
managed
bees
for
crop
pollination
and
honey
production
has
increased
dramatically.
Concerns
about
pressures
these
increases
on
native
ecosystems
resulted
in
a
recent
expansion
literature
this
subject.
To
collate
update
current
knowledge,
we
performed
systematic
review
effects
introduced
ecosystems,
focusing
wild
bees.
enable
comparison
over
time,
used
same
search
terms
focused
impacts
as
earlier
reviews.
This
covers:
(a)
interference
resource
competition
between
or
bees;
(b)
plants
weeds;
(c)
transmission
infectivity
pathogens;
classifies
into
positive,
negative,
neutral.
Compared
to
2017
review,
found
that
number
papers
issue
by
47%.
The
highest
increase
was
seen
pathogen
spill-over,
but
last
five
years
considerable
additional
information
also
become
available.
Records
negative
have
from
53%
reporting
66%
at
present.
majority
studies
investigated
visitation
foraging
behaviour.
While
only
few
experimentally
assessed
bee
reproductive
output,
78%
demonstrated
effects.
Plant
composition
negatively
affected
7%
studies,
79%
pathogens
reported
potential
Taken
together,
evidence
increasingly
suggests
affect
bees,
knowledge
should
inform
actions
prevent
further
harm
ecosystems.
Journal of Agronomy Technology and Engineering Management (JATEM),
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
7(2), P. 1054 - 1066
Published: March 25, 2024
The
symbiotic
relationship
between
bees
and
the
environment
underscores
potential
of
apiculture
as
a
sustainable
practice.
Bees,
pollinators,
play
crucial
role
in
ecosystem
health
biodiversity
conservation.
Their
pollination
services
are
essential
for
reproduction
numerous
plant
species,
including
many
crops
that
constitute
backbone
agricultural
economies.
Beekeeping
can
diversify
income
sources,
reducing
dependence
on
single
enhancing
household
resilience
to
economic
shocks.
aim
this
paper
is
explore
multifaceted
tool
rural
development.
In
conclusion,
holds
immense
promise
development,
offering
pathway
towards
prosperity,
social
inclusion,
environmental
stewardship.
By
harnessing
synergies
bees,
biodiversity,
community
beekeeping
has
transform
landscapes
livelihoods.
However,
realizing
requires
concerted
efforts
address
challenges
barriers
hinder
widespread
adoption
practices.
Through
collaborative
action
integrated
approaches,
it
unlock
transformative
power
build
resilient,
vibrant,
communities
generations
come.
Forests,
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
14(2), P. 321 - 321
Published: Feb. 6, 2023
The
management
of
natural
resources
based
on
socio-economic
and
ecology
development
has
led
to
a
focus
the
bioeconomy
in
policy
discourse
non-timber
forest
products
(NTFPs).
Honey
is
an
important
NTFP
with
high
value,
its
production
involves
millions
Indonesians.
This
article
reviews
current
status
honey-producing
bee
management,
cultivation
harvesting
system,
marketing
values,
industry’s
environmental
function
Indonesia.
research
utilized
meta-narrative
review
method
collect
data
information
from
Google
Scholar,
Scopus,
Science
Direct,
ResearchGate,
Sinta,
Garuda.
study
showed
that
four
species,
namely
Apis
mellifera,
cerana,
dorsata,
stingless
bee,
are
most
common
species
honey
have
specific
characteristics
habitat,
capacity,
derivative
products,
intervention
meet
product
standards,
sustainable
livelihoods.
value
chain
bees’
major
such
as
honey,
propolis,
pollen,
royal
jelly,
wax,
other
distribution
all
involved
communities,
including
beekeepers,
gatherers/hunters,
intermediate
traders,
processing
industry.
also
found
significant
association
between
sustainability
statutes
affects
functional
economic
function.
finding
parallels
global
trends
put
forward
forest-based
approach
resource
management.
must
be
strengthened
managing
relationships
among
supporting
actors
for
production.
bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory),
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
unknown
Published: Aug. 6, 2024
ABSTRACT
Our
understanding
of
the
western
honeybee
(
Apis
mellifera
)
predominantly
stems
from
studies
conducted
within
beekeeping
environments,
leaving
presence
and
characteristics
honeybees
outside
managed
settings
largely
unexplored.
This
study
examined
habitats,
nesting
sites,
survival
rates
free-living
colonies
through
personal
monitoring
nest
sites
in
Munich
(N=107)
coordination
Citizen
Science
across
Germany
(N=423).
Within
seven
years
we
collected
2,555
observations
on
530
311
participants.
Nesting
preferences
differed
between
urban,
rural,
forested
areas.
Overall,
found
that
31%
occupied
were
buildings
63%
mature
trees,
with
clear
for
specific
tree
species.
On
average,
only
12%
monitored
survived
annually,
a
figure
aligns
well
other
published
but
contrasts
sharply
significantly
higher
reported
by
(29%).
We
yielded
fewer
updates
per
colony,
underreported
abandoned
46%
overwintering
reports
overlapped
swarming
season
had
to
be
excluded.
To
gain
reliable
data
projects,
consistency
timing
need
particular
attention
regional
should
too.
enhances
our
ecological
dynamics,
liminal
state,
conservation
needs
cohorts,
addresses
potential
biases,
suggests
standardized
collection
protocols
future
projects.
Climate
change
significantly
impacts
animal
health
and
survival,
with
extreme
temperatures
posing
challenges.
While
managed
honey
bees
(A.
mellifera
ligustica)
are
well-studied,
less
is
known
about
feral
bees,
particularly
those
genetically
admixed
A.
scutellata,
a
subspecies
adapted
to
warmer
climates.
In
San
Diego,
California,
where
abundant,
we
investigated
thermotolerance
differences
between
bees.
We
measured
survival
after
heat
or
cold
shock,
critical
thermal
maxima
minima,
chill
coma
recovery
time,
sucrose
consumption
following
stress.
Feral
consistently
exhibited
greater
under
shock
compared
even
when
reared
in
identical
environments
at
common
apiary,
indicating
strong
genetic
basis
for
tolerance
derived
from
their
scutellata
ancestry.
contrast,
responses
varied:
showed
higher
mortality
separate
apiaries
but
no
difference
the
suggesting
environmental
influences
on
resilience.
Critical
maxima,
times
did
not
differ
bee
types,
consumed
more
potentially
reflecting
metabolic
costs
of
These
results
highlight
superior
adaptation
hybrids
climates
suggest
trade-offs
tolerance,
emphasizing
need
consider
factors
assessing
resilience
climate
change.
PeerJ,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
13, P. e18906 - e18906
Published: Feb. 17, 2025
Species
interactions
are
challenging
to
quantify,
particularly
when
they
happen
cryptically.
Molecular
methods
have
become
a
key
tool
uncover
these
leave
behind
DNA
trace
from
the
interacting
organism
(e.g.,
pollen
on
bee)
or
taxa
still
present
but
morphologically
identify
microbial
fungal
interactions).
The
decreasing
costs
of
sequencing
makes
mass
analysis
thousands
target
species
possible.
However,
challenge
has
shifted
selecting
molecular
markers
which
maximize
information
recovery
while
analyzing
data
at
broad
biological
scales.
In
this
manuscript
we
use
model
arthropod
groups
compare
and
their
across
life
stages.
We
develop
protocols
for
two
ecologically
economically
devastating
pests,
spongy
moth
(Lymantria
dispar
dispar)
emerald
ash
borer
(Agrilus
planipennis),
group
pollinators
including
bees
wasps
regularly
deposit
eggs
in
"bee
hotels"
where
larvae
develop.
Using
Illumina
MiSeq
Oxford
Nanopore
MinION
platforms
evaluate
seven
primer
pairs
five
plants,
fungi,
microbes,
insects,
parasitic
phyla
nematodes).
Our
reveals
hundreds
potential
ecological
establishes
generalized
can
be
applied
host
with
recommendations
appropriate
different
systems.
also
discuss
differentiating
co-occurring
signals
true
interactions,
problem
only
starting
recognized
as
eDNA
environment
accumulates
living
organisms.