Legislative and regulatory barriers to pharmacies dispensing buprenorphine for OUD DOI
Daniel Strickland,

Jordon T Baker

Journal of Opioid Management, Journal Year: 2023, Volume and Issue: 19(7), P. 135 - 140

Published: Oct. 18, 2023

Buprenorphine (BUP) is increasingly recognized and utilized as a valuable medication for the treatment of opioid use disorder. This article focuses on problem regulatory restrictions access to buprenorphine products without naloxone (mono-product), involving patients in one geographic area, but which may represent more general United States.In response an audit by Tennessee Board Pharmacy, pharmacy northeast designed questionnaire survey patient motivation traveling long distances fill their prescriptions BUP, rather than buprenorphine/naloxone (BNx, combo-product), document satisfaction with mono-product.Questionnaires were submitted 194 patients, living Tennessee, southwest Virginia, southeast Kentucky. Significant, intolerable, side effects reported all prescribed BNx, because legislative respective states, they unable obtain BUP closer home. Consequently, required drive significant from homes prescriptions, median distance 52 miles, some cases far 216 miles round trip. Intolerable reactions included severe headaches, nausea vomiting, allergies, dysphoria. All tolerated clinically well maintained mono-product.Severe, intolerable reactions/side component BNx are not uncommon, mono-product prohibit providers pharmacies states prescribing dispensing BUP. The participants this qualitative study found it necessary travel medication, thereby potentially limiting life-saving therapy.

Language: Английский

Addressing buprenorphine supply barriers: A guidance commentary DOI
Jordan W. Khail, Smita Rawal, Henry N. Young

et al.

Journal of the American Pharmacists Association, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 64(2), P. 377 - 379

Published: Jan. 23, 2024

Language: Английский

Citations

0

“When You Pop, You Know Everybody That Rolls”: Social and Contextual Pragmatism in Substance Initiation and Transition DOI Creative Commons
Adams L Sibley, David C. Colston, Elizabeth Joniak-Grant

et al.

Research Square (Research Square), Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: unknown

Published: Nov. 8, 2024

Abstract Background The overdose epidemic is presently driven by polydrug use, sparking renewed interest in why people initiate use of certain drugs or drug combinations. Current research privileges the physiological ends consumption, often ignoring social and environmental context use. Framed cognitive theory, purpose this study was to characterize factors precipitating substance initiation, transition, combination beyond immediate effects substance(s). Methods We conducted 30 semi-structured interviews with who across North Carolina, exploring history risk protective Participants also completed a visual timeline activity. used staged analytic approach, beginning deductive Structural Coding ending inductive Reflexive Thematic Analysis at both transcript excerpt levels. Results conceptualized transitions as pragmatic processes within environments constraints opportunities. Socially, choices were desire for interpersonal bonding, pressure assimilate practices one’s circles, ubiquity milieu. Transitions shaped – which substances are locally available, logistical convenience competing substances, material costs Conclusions Beyond new enhanced effects, serve practical functions, like facilitating emotional closeness ensuring stable supply. Interventions reduce risks should account these contextual instance, educating on strategies avoid normative pressures promoting safe, affordable, accessible

Language: Английский

Citations

0

Unfilled prescriptions: Surveying patients' experiences with buprenorphine treatment in Massachusetts before and during the COVID‐19 pandemic DOI Open Access
Joseph A. Rosansky,

Mark Albanese,

Joshua T. Phillips

et al.

American Journal on Addictions, Journal Year: 2023, Volume and Issue: 32(6), P. 615 - 618

Published: Aug. 6, 2023

Abstract Background and Objectives We explored potential challenges to accessing office‐based opioid treatment (OBOT) with buprenorphine during the COVID‐19 pandemic. Methods Using Facebook advertisements, we recruited a sample of N = 72 participants conducted four repeated‐measures analysis variance comparing ratings participants' abilities access aspects OBOT treatment. Results Participants reported increased difficulty filling prescriptions pandemic than before, p .011, partial η 2 0.092, this was correlated past month use, r .236, .042. Discussion, Conclusions, Scientific Significance This is first investigation report unfilled an association use. Unfilled may contribute relapse partially explain overdose deaths COVID‐19.

Language: Английский

Citations

1

Challenges of Estimating the Value of Buprenorphine Injectables DOI Creative Commons
Lewis S. Nelson, Jeanmarie Perrone

JAMA Network Open, Journal Year: 2023, Volume and Issue: 6(9), P. e2329677 - e2329677

Published: Sept. 13, 2023

Language: Английский

Citations

1

Legislative and regulatory barriers to pharmacies dispensing buprenorphine for OUD DOI
Daniel Strickland,

Jordon T Baker

Journal of Opioid Management, Journal Year: 2023, Volume and Issue: 19(7), P. 135 - 140

Published: Oct. 18, 2023

Buprenorphine (BUP) is increasingly recognized and utilized as a valuable medication for the treatment of opioid use disorder. This article focuses on problem regulatory restrictions access to buprenorphine products without naloxone (mono-product), involving patients in one geographic area, but which may represent more general United States.In response an audit by Tennessee Board Pharmacy, pharmacy northeast designed questionnaire survey patient motivation traveling long distances fill their prescriptions BUP, rather than buprenorphine/naloxone (BNx, combo-product), document satisfaction with mono-product.Questionnaires were submitted 194 patients, living Tennessee, southwest Virginia, southeast Kentucky. Significant, intolerable, side effects reported all prescribed BNx, because legislative respective states, they unable obtain BUP closer home. Consequently, required drive significant from homes prescriptions, median distance 52 miles, some cases far 216 miles round trip. Intolerable reactions included severe headaches, nausea vomiting, allergies, dysphoria. All tolerated clinically well maintained mono-product.Severe, intolerable reactions/side component BNx are not uncommon, mono-product prohibit providers pharmacies states prescribing dispensing BUP. The participants this qualitative study found it necessary travel medication, thereby potentially limiting life-saving therapy.

Language: Английский

Citations

0