Contextualizing Changes in e-Cigarette Use During the Early COVID-19 Pandemic and Accompanying Infodemic (“So Much Contradictory Evidence”): Qualitative Document Analysis of Reddit Forums
Shannon Lea Watkins,
No information about this author
Katherine Snodgrass,
No information about this author
Lexi Fahrion
No information about this author
et al.
Journal of Medical Internet Research,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
27, P. e66010 - e66010
Published: March 20, 2025
Background
Understanding
how
social
media
platforms
facilitate
information
exchange
and
influence
behavior
during
health
crises
can
enhance
public
responses
times
of
uncertainty.
While
some
risk
factors
for
COVID-19
susceptibility
severity
(eg,
old
age)
were
clear,
whether
e-cigarette
use
increased
was
not
clear.
People
who
used
e-cigarettes
had
to
navigate
both
the
infodemic
a
conflicting,
politicized,
changing
environment
about
interaction
between
use.
Objective
This
study
aims
characterize
contextualize
e-cigarette–related
changes
early
pandemic
illuminate
role
that
played
in
decision-making.
Methods
We
conducted
qualitative
analysis
COVID-19–related
discussions
on
3
Reddit
forums
e-cigarettes.
collected
189
relevant
discussion
threads
made
first
6
months
(collected
from
June
27,
2020,
July
3,
2020).
Threads
included
3155
total
comments
(mean
17
comments)
approximately
1200
unique
Redditors.
developed
applied
emergent
codes
related
perceptions
behaviors
nicotine
do-it-yourself
narratives)
web-based
community
interactions
advice),
identified
thematic
patterns
across
codes,
model
synthesize
socioecological
context
behaviors.
Results
e-Cigarette
subreddits
provided
platform
Redditors
discuss
experiences
with
e-cigarettes,
make
sense
information,
provide
emotional
support.
Discussions
reflected
an
array
behavioral
responses,
including
increases
decreases
intensity,
purchasing
practices
stockpiling),
vaping
reusing
disposable
pods).
presented
theoretically
empirically
informed
circumstances
created
by
activity
space
product
shortages)
compelled
changes.
drew
their
existing
perceptions,
intentions,
tobacco
products;
personal
experiences;
participation
decide
change
pandemic.
Forums
uncertainty,
stress,
debate
rapidly
evolving
complicated
information.
Consumption
news
articles
peer-reviewed
publications)
Decisions
distrust
media.
Conclusions
Variations
individual
traits
environmental
why
there
no
unified
direction
this
period.
Information
also
decisions
Social
is
effective
important
place
communicate
particularly
crisis
or
disaster
situations.
Moving
forward,
transparent,
accurate,
specific
message
development
should
consider
struggles,
stigma
people
address
roles
mistrust
misinformation
play
decisions.
Language: Английский
Prospective Associations of COVID‐19 Pandemic‐Related Stressful Events With Mental and Sleep Health in a Population‐Based Cohort Study of Adults With SARS‐CoV‐2 Infection
Stress and Health,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
41(3)
Published: May 2, 2025
ABSTRACT
COVID‐19
pandemic‐related
stressful
events
are
associated
with
adverse
mental
health
outcomes;
however,
prior
evidence
is
limited
due
to
cross‐sectional
designs
or
convenience
sampling,
little
focus
on
sleep
health.
We
examined
prospective
associations
of
at
baseline
and
follow‐up
using
a
population‐based
cohort
Michigan
adults
PCR‐confirmed
COVID‐19.
measured
COVID‐19‐related
the
6‐item
Epidemic‐Pandemic
Impacts
Inventory
(EPII),
designed
assess
pandemic
impacts
across
personal
social
life
domains.
conducted
(1)
modified
Poisson
regression
robust
standard
errors
for
depressive
symptoms,
anxiety
post‐traumatic
stress
disorder
(PTSD)
poor‐to‐very
poor
quality
(2)
multinomial
logistic
duration
(<
6,
6–9,
>
9
h).
adjusted
sociodemographic,
clinical,
survey
factors.
Our
analytic
samples
were
n
=
3523
3191
Each
additional
event
reported
was
higher
risk
reporting
symptoms
(adjusted
ratio
[aRR]:
1.22,
95%
confidence
interval
[CI]:1.14–1.30),
(aRR:
1.20,
CI:
1.14–1.27)
PTSD
1.31,
1.22–1.42).
also
1.13
times
(95%
1.07–1.20).
In
models,
1.21
1.06–1.37)
sleeping
<
6
h
relative
6–9
h.
need
support
services
programs
improve
psychological
behavioural
responses
events.
Language: Английский
Contextualizing Changes in e-Cigarette Use During the Early COVID-19 Pandemic and Accompanying Infodemic (“So Much Contradictory Evidence”): Qualitative Document Analysis of Reddit Forums (Preprint)
Shannon Lea Watkins,
No information about this author
Katherine Snodgrass,
No information about this author
Lexi Fahrion
No information about this author
et al.
Published: Sept. 1, 2024
BACKGROUND
Understanding
how
social
media
platforms
facilitate
information
exchange
and
influence
behavior
during
health
crises
can
enhance
public
responses
times
of
uncertainty.
While
some
risk
factors
for
COVID-19
susceptibility
severity
(eg,
old
age)
were
clear,
whether
e-cigarette
use
increased
was
not
clear.
People
who
used
e-cigarettes
had
to
navigate
both
the
infodemic
a
conflicting,
politicized,
changing
environment
about
interaction
between
use.
OBJECTIVE
This
study
aims
characterize
contextualize
e-cigarette–related
changes
early
pandemic
illuminate
role
that
played
in
decision-making.
METHODS
We
conducted
qualitative
analysis
COVID-19–related
discussions
on
3
Reddit
forums
e-cigarettes.
collected
189
relevant
discussion
threads
made
first
6
months
(collected
from
June
27,
2020,
July
3,
2020).
Threads
included
3155
total
comments
(mean
17
comments)
approximately
1200
unique
Redditors.
developed
applied
emergent
codes
related
perceptions
behaviors
nicotine
do-it-yourself
narratives)
web-based
community
interactions
advice),
identified
thematic
patterns
across
codes,
model
synthesize
socioecological
context
behaviors.
RESULTS
e-Cigarette
subreddits
provided
platform
Redditors
discuss
experiences
with
e-cigarettes,
make
sense
information,
provide
emotional
support.
Discussions
reflected
an
array
behavioral
responses,
including
increases
decreases
intensity,
purchasing
practices
stockpiling),
vaping
reusing
disposable
pods).
presented
theoretically
empirically
informed
circumstances
created
by
activity
space
product
shortages)
compelled
changes.
drew
their
existing
perceptions,
intentions,
tobacco
products;
personal
experiences;
participation
decide
change
pandemic.
Forums
uncertainty,
stress,
debate
rapidly
evolving
complicated
information.
Consumption
news
articles
peer-reviewed
publications)
Decisions
distrust
media.
CONCLUSIONS
Variations
individual
traits
environmental
why
there
no
unified
direction
this
period.
Information
also
decisions
Social
is
effective
important
place
communicate
particularly
crisis
or
disaster
situations.
Moving
forward,
transparent,
accurate,
specific
message
development
should
consider
struggles,
stigma
people
address
roles
mistrust
misinformation
play
decisions.
Language: Английский
Social Disparities in Lifestyle and Body Weight Changes during COVID-19 Quarantine and Post-Quarantine Persistence of Changes among Lithuanian Adult Population
Nutrients,
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
15(19), P. 4254 - 4254
Published: Oct. 4, 2023
The
role
of
social
factors
on
changes
in
lifestyle
habits
during
the
COVID-19
quarantine
and
their
maintenance
post-quarantine
is
underexamined.
This
study
aimed
to
assess
sociodemographic
differences
nutrition,
physical
activity
body
weight
persistence
post
quarantine.
included
a
random
sample
Lithuanian
residents
aged
20
64.
questionnaires
were
filled
face-to-face
interview
within
households
countrywide
2023.
In
total,
1500
individuals
(742
men
758
women)
participated
survey.
Up
34.9%
respondents
reported
eating
habits,
mostly
increased
consumption,
29.5%
indicated
reduced
activity,
22.7%
gained
weight.
Multivariate
logistic
regression
analysis
revealed
that
highly
educated
more
likely
than
poorly
increase
healthy
decrease
unhealthy
food
consumption
city
inhabitants
unfavourable
nutrition
often
those
living
villages
did.
proportion
who
depending
habit
varied
from
23.2%
71.4%
period.
Highly
less
maintain
decreased
fresh
fruits
less-educated
were.
Our
provides
evidence
targeted
interventions
are
needed
help
develop
even
times
crisis.
Language: Английский