medRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory),
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
unknown
Published: Feb. 23, 2024
Abstract
This
study
investigated
the
effectiveness
of
natural
infection
in
preventing
reinfection
with
JN.1
variant
during
a
large
wave
Qatar,
using
test-negative
case-control
design.
The
overall
previous
was
estimated
at
only
1.8%
(95%
CI:
−9.3-12.6%).
demonstrated
rapid
decline
over
time
since
infection,
decreasing
from
82.4%
40.9-94.7%)
within
3
to
less
than
6
months
after
50.9%
−11.8-78.7%)
subsequent
months,
and
further
dropping
18.3%
−34.6-56.3%)
months.
Ultimately,
it
reached
negligible
level
one
year.
findings
show
that
protection
against
is
strong
among
those
who
were
infected
last
variants
such
as
XBB*.
However,
this
wanes
rapidly
entirely
lost
year
infection.
support
considerable
immune
evasion
by
JN.1.
Vaccine,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
42(14), P. 3307 - 3320
Published: April 14, 2024
Vaccines
were
developed
and
deployed
to
combat
severe
acute
respiratory
syndrome
coronavirus
2
(SARS-CoV-2)
infection.
This
study
aimed
characterize
patterns
in
the
protection
provided
by
BNT162b2
mRNA-1273
mRNA
vaccines
against
a
spectrum
of
SARS-CoV-2
infection
symptoms
severities.
A
national,
matched,
test-negative,
case-control
was
conducted
Qatar
between
January
1
December
18,
2021,
utilizing
sample
238,896
PCR-positive
tests
6,533,739
PCR-negative
tests.
Vaccine
effectiveness
estimated
asymptomatic,
symptomatic,
disease
2019
(COVID-19),
critical
COVID-19,
fatal
COVID-19
infections.
Data
sources
included
Qatar's
national
databases
for
laboratory
testing,
vaccination,
hospitalization,
death.
Effectiveness
two-dose
vaccination
75.6%
(95%
CI:
73.6–77.5)
asymptomatic
76.5%
75.1–77.9)
symptomatic
each
severe,
critical,
infections
surpassed
90%.
Immediately
after
second
dose,
all
categories—namely,
COVID-19—exhibited
similarly
high
effectiveness.
However,
from
181
270
days
post-second
declined
below
40%,
while
remained
consistently
high.
estimates
often
had
wide
95%
confidence
intervals.
Analogous
observed
three-dose
two-
vaccination.
Sensitivity
analyses
confirmed
results.
gradient
vaccine
exists
is
linked
severity
infection,
providing
higher
more
cases.
intensifies
over
time
as
immunity
wanes
last
dose.
These
appear
consistent
irrespective
type
or
whether
involves
primary
series
booster.
Science Advances,
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
9(40)
Published: Oct. 4, 2023
Laboratory
evidence
suggests
a
possibility
of
immune
imprinting
for
severe
acute
respiratory
syndrome
coronavirus
2
(SARS-CoV-2)
infection.
We
investigated
the
differences
in
incidence
SARS-CoV-2
reinfection
cohort
persons
who
had
primary
Omicron
infection,
but
different
vaccination
histories
using
matched,
national,
retrospective,
studies.
Adjusted
hazard
ratio
incidence,
factoring
adjustment
testing
rate,
was
0.43
[95%
confidence
interval
(CI):
0.39
to
0.49]
comparing
history
two-dose
no
vaccination,
1.47
(95%
CI:
1.23
1.76)
three-dose
and
0.57
0.48
0.68)
vaccination.
Divergence
cumulative
curves
increased
markedly
when
dominated
by
BA.4/BA.5
BA.2.75*
subvariants.
The
primary-series
enhanced
protection
against
reinfection,
booster
compromised
reinfection.
These
findings
do
not
undermine
public
health
utility
Health and Ecology Issues,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
21(4), P. 26 - 36
Published: Jan. 16, 2025
Objective
.
To
assess
the
efficacy
of
immunogenicity
Soberana
Plus
(FINLAY-FR-1A)
vaccine
in
adults
previously
vaccinated
against
COVID-19.
Materials
and
methods
A
total
98
participants
participated
study.
The
was
studied
by
measuring
IgG
concentration
to
SARS-CoV-2
enzyme-linked
immunosorbent
assay
(ELISA)
at
4
study
sites:
day
0,
42
days,
90
days
180
after
administration.
Results
Participants
were
divided
into
groups
based
on
their
primary
immunization:
1)
Sputnik
V
(Gam-COVID-Vac)
/
Light;
2)
Sinopharm
(BBIBP-CorV);
3)
(BBIBP-CorV)
+
(Gam-COVIDVac)
Light.
highest
level
observed
administration
booster
dose
(p<
0,001).
At
“90
day”
point,
levels
higher
with
Light
(BBIBP-CorV),
however,
this
group
had
before
In
vaccination,
age
“45
plus”
level,
compared
“25-45
years
old”
(р=0,048).
Conclusion
is
quite
immunogenic.
marked
(р
Open Forum Infectious Diseases,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
12(3)
Published: Feb. 17, 2025
Abstract
Background
Accurately
assessing
SARS-CoV-2
infection
severity
is
essential
for
understanding
the
health
impact
of
and
evaluating
effectiveness
interventions.
This
study
investigated
whether
SARS-CoV-2–associated
hospitalizations
can
reliably
measure
true
COVID-19
severity.
Methods
The
diagnostic
accuracy
acute
care
ICU
as
indicators
was
assessed
in
Qatar
from
6
September
2021
to
13
May
2024.
WHO
criteria
severe,
critical,
fatal
served
reference
standard.
Two
were
assessed:
(1)
any
hospitalization
or
beds
(2)
ICU-only
hospitalizations.
Results
A
total
644
176
infections
analyzed.
percent
agreement
between
(acute
ICU)
98.7%
(95%
confidence
interval
(CI),
98.6–98.7);
however,
Cohen's
kappa
only
0.17
CI,
0.16–0.18),
indicating
poor
agreement.
Sensitivity,
specificity,
PPV,
negative
predictive
value
100%
99.6–100),
98.6–98.7),
9.7%
9.1–10.3),
100–100),
respectively.
For
hospitalizations,
99.8%
99.8–99.9),
with
a
0.47
0.44–0.50),
fair-to-good
46.6%
43.4–49.9),
99.9%
99.9–99.9),
47.9%
44.6–51.2),
Conclusions
Generic
hospital
admissions
are
unreliable
severity,
whereas
somewhat
more
accurate.
findings
demonstrate
importance
applying
specific,
robust
criteria—such
criteria—to
reduce
bias
epidemiological
vaccine
studies.
F1000Research,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
13, P. 886 - 886
Published: Feb. 20, 2025
Background
The
mass
vaccination
campaign
against
COVID-19
has
been
commonly
considered
the
best
response
to
global
pandemic
crisis.
However,
assessment
of
its
real-world
effect
can
be
performed
by
analysis
all-cause
mortality
status.
UK
is
perhaps
only
country
which
made
publicly
available
data
Methods
Data
from
April
2021
May
2023
published
Office
for
National
Statistics
(ONS)
were
retrospectively
analyzed
age
groups
and
status;
standardized
ratio
(SMR)
non-COVID-19
was
calculated
corresponding
unvaccinated
groups.
Results
We
found
that
across
all
groups,
SMRs
increased
a
certain
date,
dependent
on
group.
Across
initially
much
lower
than
1.
due
their
increase,
date
18-39,
80-89
90+
they
exceeded
reference
value.
For
other
at
SMR
would
reach
1
predicted,
provided
trend
maintained.
Non-COVID-19
SMRs’
trends
very
similar.
Their
initial
values
are
suggestive
significant
biases
in
ONS
dataset,
leading
underestimate
risks
vaccinated
people,
as
it
implausible
vaccines
protect
deaths.
Conclusions
increase
over
time
death
people
compared
unvaccinated,
excess
should
carefully
understand
underlying
factors.
Furthermore,
since
1,
we
assume
presence
understimate
It
desirable
major
countries
systematically
collect
status
and,
meantime,
pending
indepth
investigations,
greater
caution
exercised
promoting
campaigns.
Journal of Infection and Public Health,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
18(6), P. 102746 - 102746
Published: March 12, 2025
Protection
against
severe
course
of
SARS-CoV-2
infection
after
COVID-19
vaccination
or
was
extensively
studied.
It
is
unknown
whether
this
effect
also
translates
into
shortened
duration
mild
infections.
We
assessed
the
symptoms
depending
on
status
and
previous
infections
among
individuals
with
a
infection.
For
two
post-pandemic
winters
(2022/2023
2023/2024),
in
total
13,615
participants
German
DigiHero
study
reported
their
from
September
to
March.
Via
negative
binomial
regression
adjusting
for
sociodemographic
factors,
we
studied
association
(days
bed)
number
vaccinations,
prior
infections,
time
since
last
vaccination/and
noted
no
major
differences
vaccinations
short
(≤21
days
symptoms).
Per
6
months
vaccination,
symptom
spent
bed
increased
by
2
%
4
%.
The
risk
long
(>21
symptoms)
higher
(Odds
Ratio:
1.98;
95
confidence
interval
[1.43;
2.76]),
but
not
(OR:
0.98;
CI
[0.74;
1.33]).
There
indication
reduced
during
A
protective
prolonged
disease
Communications Medicine,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
5(1)
Published: March 27, 2025
Variant-adapted
vaccines
are
recommended
in
vulnerable
populations
to
address
the
waning
immunity
and
emergence
of
immune-escaping
SARS-CoV-2
variants,
yet
data
about
immune
responses
such
people
living
with
HIV
(PLWH)
limited.
We
therefore
aimed
assess
long-term
an
original–BA.4/5
mRNA
booster
this
population.
In
prospective
longitudinal
study,
PLWH
receiving
either
bivalent
or
original
monovalent
HIV-negative
healthcare
workers
(HCWs)
a
were
enrolled
sampled
before
(T0),
1
month
(T1),
4–9
months
(T2)
after
vaccine
administration.
SARS-CoV-2–specific
T
B
cells,
RBD-binding
antibodies,
RBD-blocking
antibodies
against
both
wild
type
(WT)
omicron
BA.4/5
virus
determined.
The
is
able
transiently
increase
humoral
polyfunctional
cell
PLWH,
comparable
those
observed
HCWs.
While
cross-reactive
viral
variants
stable
over
time,
imprinted
ancestral
wanes
quickly.
Furthermore,
whilst
previous
infection
does
not
affect
trajectory
vaccine-elicited
responses,
markers
HIV-related
dysfunction
associated
lower
antibody
peak
higher
waning.
Lastly,
was
superior
one
inducing
BA.4/5-reactive
antibodies.
highly
immunogenic
virus,
although
blunted
less
durable
immunity.
adapted
recently
circulating
populations,
as
(PLWH).
we
studied
newly
designed
cohort.
showed
that
could
stimulate
small
proteins
body
produces
SAR-CoV-2
mutant
fight
virus.
This
new
design
produced
improved
compared
older
designs,
but
compromised
system
have
short-lived
protection
evolving
Augello
et
al.
Omicron
HIV.
enhances
immunity,
virus;
reduces
durability.
BMJ Public Health,
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
1(1), P. e000479 - e000479
Published: Oct. 1, 2023
To
assess
the
evolution
of
COVID-19
severity
and
fatality
in
a
unique
setting
that
consistently
applied,
throughout
pandemic,
rigorous
standardised
criteria
for
defining
severe
outcomes.
We
conducted
national
cohort
study
on
312
109
Qatari
citizens
to
investigate
incidence
severe,
critical
or
fatal
classified
according
WHO
between
28
February
2020
21
April
2023.
Incidence
rates
were
estimated
during
pre-omicron
phase,
first
omicron
wave,
combined
phases
pandemic.
Cumulative
after
3.14
years
follow-up
was
0.45%
(95%
CI
0.43%
0.47%).
rate
pandemic
1.43
1.35
1.50)
per
1000
person
years.
In
phases,
it
2.01
1.90
2.13),
3.70
3.25
4.22)
2.18
2.07
2.30)
years,
respectively.
The
post-first
phase
saw
drastic
drop
0.10
0.08
0.14)
95.4%
reduction.
Among
all
cases,
99.5%
occurred
primary
infection.
0.042%
0.036%
0.050%),
with
an
0.13
0.11
0.16)
decreased
by
90.0%
compared
earlier
stages.
Both
exhibited
exponential
increase
age
linear
number
coexisting
conditions.
conclusion
wave
turning
point
While
vaccination
enhanced
case
management
reduced
gradually,
rapid
accumulation
natural
immunity
appears
have
played
role
driving
this
shift
severity.
AIDS,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
38(9), P. 1355 - 1365
Published: May 24, 2024
Objective:
We
evaluated
the
immunogenicity
of
a
bivalent
BA.1
COVID-19
booster
vaccine
in
people
with
HIV
(PWH).
Design:
Prospective
observational
cohort
study.
Methods:
PWH
aged
≥45
years
received
Wuhan-BA.1
mRNA-1273.214
and
those
<45
BNT162b2.
Participants
were
propensity
score-matched
1
:
2
to
without
(non-PWH)
by
age,
primary
platform
(mRNA-based
or
vector-based),
number
prior
boosters
SARS-CoV-2
infections,
spike
(S1)-specific
antibodies
on
day
administration.
The
endpoint
was
geometric
mean
ratio
(GMR)
ancestral
S1-specific
from
0
28
compared
non-PWH.
Secondary
endpoints
included
humoral
responses,
T-cell
responses
cytokine
up
180
days
post-vaccination.
Results:
Forty
(
N
=
35)
BNT162b2
5)
following
mRNA-based
29)
vector-based
11)
vaccination.
predominantly
male
(87%
vs.
26%
non-PWH)
median
57
[interquartile
range
(IQR)
53–59].
Their
CD4
+
count
775
(IQR
511–965)
plasma
HIV-RNA
load
<50
copies/ml
39/40.
GMR
post-vaccination
comparable
between
[4.48,
95%
confidence
interval
(CI)
3.24–6.19]
non-PWH
(4.07,
CI
3.42–4.83).
antibody
days,
90
Interferon-γ,
interleukin
(IL)-2,
IL-4
concentrations
increased
PWH.
Conclusion:
A
immunogenic
well
treated
PWH,
eliciting
However,
waned
faster
after
F1000Research,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
13, P. 886 - 886
Published: Aug. 5, 2024
Background
The
mass
vaccination
campaign
against
COVID-19
has
been
commonly
considered
the
best
response
to
global
pandemic
crisis.
However,
assess
its
real-world
overall
effects,
way
can
be
analysis
of
all-cause
mortality
by
status.
UK
is
perhaps
only
country
which
made
publicly
available
data
Methods
Data
from
April
2021
May
2023
published
Office
for
National
Statistics
(ONS)
were
retrospectively
analyzed
age
groups
and
status;
standardized
ratio
(SMR)
non-COVID-19
was
calculated
corresponding
unvaccinated
groups.
Results
We
found
that
across
all
groups,
SMRs
increased
a
certain
date,
dependent
on
group.
Across
initially
much
lower
than
1.
due
their
increase,
date
18-39,
80-89
90+
they
exceeded
reference
value.
For
other
at
SMR
would
reach
1
predicted,
provided
trend
maintained.
Non-COVID-19
SMRs’
trends
very
similar.
Their
initial
values
are
suggestive
significant
biases
in
ONS
dataset,
leading
underestimate
risks
vaccinated
people,
as
it
implausible
vaccines
protect
deaths.
Conclusions
increase
over
time
death
people
compared
unvaccinated,
excess
should
carefully
understand
underlying
factors.
It
desirable
major
countries
systematically
collect
status
and,
meantime,
moratorium
promoting
campaigns
implemented.