Stop and go: exploring alternative mechanisms for task allocation in social insects - response and satisfaction thresholds trade off cost, accuracy, and speed differently DOI Creative Commons
Colin Lynch,

Rebecca Wilson,

Anna Dornhaus

et al.

bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: unknown

Published: May 14, 2024

Abstract Division of labor, a key feature many complex systems, requires mechanism that allows individuals to choose tasks. The popular ‘response threshold hypothesis’ posits some workers start engaging in particular tasks at lower level need than others. However, may only have access information about after they actually engage task. We therefore introduce two novel interpretations this task-allocation mechanism. While the mechanism’ determines when working, ‘satisfaction drives stop working. also model ‘composite where consider task both and end Second, we possibility stimulus perceived by is ‘completion’ cue instead ‘demand’ cue. these seem like subtle variations, show here can yield dramatically different collective dynamics. In simulations with biologically relevant parameter ranges, response thresholds produced quickest reaction increases demand, satisfaction yielded lowest task-switching rate, composite most closely matched number allocated needed. Different types thus differentially trade off speed, cost, accuracy. did not benefits specialization; purely terms allocating tasks, found usually perform worse null random choice cost efficiency, variation among does improve allocation. Colonies utilizing demand cues tend better those using completion cues. Our results ultimately suggest mechanisms be suited for situations or Author Summary labor phenomenon community consistently differ work on. Many scientists believe division arises social insects (i.e. ants bees) as result difference workers’ responsiveness correspond For example, colony feeding brood much sooner others, possibly because higher sensitivity, threshold’, pheromone. such decide on task, theoretically use it working; similarly, tells them how needed one corresponds has already been done. These seemingly differences affect invests quickly stability reached balance changes. Therefore, evolve solve problems.

Language: Английский

A soluble model for synchronized rhythmic activity in ant colonies DOI

Pedro M. M. da Silveira,

José F. Fontanari

Mathematical Biosciences, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 375, P. 109245 - 109245

Published: July 3, 2024

Language: Английский

Citations

2

Synchronized Rhythmic Activity of Ants with Distributed Rest Periods DOI Creative Commons

Pedro M. M. da Silveira,

José F. Fontanari

Mathematics, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 12(24), P. 3893 - 3893

Published: Dec. 10, 2024

Synchronization is a prevalent phenomenon in biological systems, including social insects such as ants. Certain ant species exhibit remarkable synchronization of their activities within the nest. To elucidate underlying mechanisms this coordinated behavior, we propose an integro-differential equation model that captures autocatalytic nature activation. Active ants can stimulate inactive individuals, leading to cascade arousal. By incorporating stochastic component represent variability rest periods, explore conditions necessary for synchronization. Our analysis reveals critical threshold fluctuations duration. Exceeding disrupts synchronization, driving system towards stable equilibrium. These findings offer valuable insights into factors governing activity and highlight delicate balance between parameters required generate rhythmic patterns.

Language: Английский

Citations

1

Stop and go: exploring alternative mechanisms for task allocation in social insects - response and satisfaction thresholds trade off cost, accuracy, and speed differently DOI Creative Commons
Colin Lynch,

Rebecca Wilson,

Anna Dornhaus

et al.

bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: unknown

Published: May 14, 2024

Abstract Division of labor, a key feature many complex systems, requires mechanism that allows individuals to choose tasks. The popular ‘response threshold hypothesis’ posits some workers start engaging in particular tasks at lower level need than others. However, may only have access information about after they actually engage task. We therefore introduce two novel interpretations this task-allocation mechanism. While the mechanism’ determines when working, ‘satisfaction drives stop working. also model ‘composite where consider task both and end Second, we possibility stimulus perceived by is ‘completion’ cue instead ‘demand’ cue. these seem like subtle variations, show here can yield dramatically different collective dynamics. In simulations with biologically relevant parameter ranges, response thresholds produced quickest reaction increases demand, satisfaction yielded lowest task-switching rate, composite most closely matched number allocated needed. Different types thus differentially trade off speed, cost, accuracy. did not benefits specialization; purely terms allocating tasks, found usually perform worse null random choice cost efficiency, variation among does improve allocation. Colonies utilizing demand cues tend better those using completion cues. Our results ultimately suggest mechanisms be suited for situations or Author Summary labor phenomenon community consistently differ work on. Many scientists believe division arises social insects (i.e. ants bees) as result difference workers’ responsiveness correspond For example, colony feeding brood much sooner others, possibly because higher sensitivity, threshold’, pheromone. such decide on task, theoretically use it working; similarly, tells them how needed one corresponds has already been done. These seemingly differences affect invests quickly stability reached balance changes. Therefore, evolve solve problems.

Language: Английский

Citations

0