Cambridge University Press eBooks,
Journal Year:
2020,
Volume and Issue:
unknown, P. 53 - 62
Published: Nov. 16, 2020
American
black
bears
(Ursus
americanus)
are
by
far
the
most
abundant
species
of
bear,
numbering
more
than
twice
that
all
other
bear
combined.
Many
US
states
share
this
history
decline
and
resurgence,
today
have
burgeoning
populations.
To
a
large
extent,
comeback
has
been
consequence
restrictions
on
killing,
fundamental
change
in
how
public
perceives
reacts
to
bears.
However,
success
is
also
due
its
biological
adaptiveness
–
ability
live
vast
array
habitats,
adapt
radically
variable
food
conditions,
tolerate
presence
people
changes
they
imposed
landscape.
This
chapter
highlights
adaptability
using
an
extensive
diverse
data
set
spanning
38
years.
We
explore
reasons
for
their
commonness,
long-term
case
study
from
near
geographic
center
species'
range:
Minnesota,
USA.
Conservation Science and Practice,
Journal Year:
2020,
Volume and Issue:
2(5)
Published: Feb. 26, 2020
Abstract
Large
carnivores
often
impact
human
livelihoods
and
well‐being.
Previous
research
has
mostly
focused
on
the
negative
impacts
of
large
well‐being
but
rarely
considered
positive
aspects
living
with
carnivores.
In
particular,
we
know
very
little
people's
direct
experiences
like
personal
encounters
awareness
tolerance
toward
their
exposure
to
Here,
focus
wolf
(
Canis
lupus
),
report
a
phone
survey
in
Germany.
We
examined
whether
wolves
were
or
quantified
related
wolves.
found
that
majority
people
reported
when
encountering
wolves,
regardless
encountered
wild
within
Germany,
abroad,
captivity.
The
frequency
did
not
affect
probability
positive,
neutral,
experiences.
Moreover,
Germany
expressed
high
close
vicinity
These
findings
are
novel
important
because
they
highlight
proximity
human‐dominated
landscapes.
Cambridge University Press eBooks,
Journal Year:
2020,
Volume and Issue:
unknown
Published: Nov. 16, 2020
Bears
have
fascinated
people
since
ancient
times.
The
relationship
between
bears
and
humans
dates
back
thousands
of
years,
during
which
time
we
also
competed
with
for
shelter
food.
In
modern
times,
come
under
pressure
through
encroachment
on
their
habitats,
climate
change,
illegal
trade
in
body
parts,
including
the
Asian
bear
bile
market.
IUCN
lists
six
as
vulnerable
or
endangered,
even
least
concern
species,
such
brown
bear,
are
at
risk
extirpation
certain
countries.
poaching
international
these
most
threatened
populations
prohibited,
but
still
ongoing.
Covering
all
species
worldwide,
this
beautifully
illustrated
volume
brings
together
contributions
200
experts
ecology,
conservation
status,
management
Ursidae
family.
It
reveals
fascinating
long
history
interactions
threats
affecting
charismatic
species.
Environmental Management,
Journal Year:
2019,
Volume and Issue:
64(5), P. 537 - 552
Published: Oct. 17, 2019
Abstract
We
investigated
the
impact
of
Norway’s
current
zonal
carnivore
management
system
for
four
large
species
on
sheep
farming.
Sheep
losses
increased
when
carnivores
were
reintroduced,
but
has
declined
again
after
introduction
zoning
system.
The
total
number
outside,
slightly
inside
zones.
production
increased,
farming
was
still
lost
as
a
source
income
many
farmers.
use
grazing
resources
became
more
extensive.
Losses
decreased
because
removed
from
open
outfield
pastures
and
farmers
gave
up
While
wolves
expel
areas,
small
herds
can
be
kept
in
fenced
enclosures.
Bears
are
every
respect
incompatible
with
Farmers
adjust
to
seasonal
predictable
behavior
lynx
wolverine,
although
these
also
may
cause
serious
present.
mitigating
efforts
costly
lead
reduced
animal
welfare
lower
farmers,
peri-urban
areas
increasingly
keeping
an
avocation.
There
is
spillover
effect
strategy
sense
that
there
substantial
loss
livestock
geographically
near
policy
used
Norway
reasonably
successful
goal
separate
decrease
losses,
burdens
unequally
distributed
zones
at
economic
disadvantage.
Frontiers in Conservation Science,
Journal Year:
2021,
Volume and Issue:
2
Published: Aug. 20, 2021
Human-wildlife
interactions
are
embedded
within
socio-ecological
systems
(SES),
in
which
animal
behavior
and
human
decision-making
reciprocally
interact.
While
a
growing
body
of
research
addresses
specific
social
ecological
elements
human-wildlife
interactions,
including
conflicts,
integrating
these
approaches
is
essential
for
identifying
practical
effective
solutions.
Carnivore
predation
on
livestock
can
threaten
livelihoods,
weaken
relationships
among
stakeholders,
precipitate
carnivore
declines.
As
carnivores
have
received
greater
protection
recent
decades,
researchers
managers
sought
non-lethal
tools
to
reduce
promote
coexistence
between
producers
carnivores.
For
be
successful,
they
must
effectively
deter
carnivores,
also
adopted
by
producers.
Relatively
few
studies
examine
the
context-specific
effectiveness
tools,
even
fewer
simultaneously
consider
their
acceptability
To
address
this
gap,
we
suggest
that
tool's
analyzed
concurrently
determine
its
.
We
thus
paired
an
experimental
study
deterrent
called
Foxlights®
with
qualitative
interviews
Northern
California.
placed
camera
traps
sheep
pastures
measure
response
coyotes
(
Canis
latrans
)
experimentally
deployed
Foxlights
interviewed
before
after
experiment.
Our
experiment
revealed
weak
evidence
reducing
coyote
activity
Foxlights,
but
potential
adoption
had
as
much
do
implementation
feasibility
evidence-based
measurements
tool
effectiveness.
Interviewees
viewed
potentially
components
husbandry
systems,
despite
data
suggesting
otherwise,
demonstrating
scientific
reductionism
may
lag
behind
producer
practices
systems-thinking
isolated
demonstrations
not
drive
adoption.
Future
empirical
tests
should
better
producers'
perspectives
acknowledge
data-based
alone
limited
place
decision-making.
Iteratively
working
build
trust
outputs
through
process
itself.
Conservation Science and Practice,
Journal Year:
2020,
Volume and Issue:
3(3)
Published: April 1, 2020
Abstract
Conflict
between
livestock
producers
and
wild
predators
is
a
central
driver
of
large
predator
declines
simultaneously
may
imperil
the
lives
livelihoods
producers.
There
growing
recognition
that
livestock–predator
conflict
socio‐ecological
problem,
but
few
case
studies
exist
to
guide
research
management
from
this
point
view.
Here
we
present
study
coyote‐sheep
predation
on
California
ranch
in
which
combine
methods
rapidly
field
risk
modeling
with
participatory
mapping
perceptions
risk.
Our
findings
reveal
an
important
selection
bias
occur
when
producer
decisions
are
excluded
ecological
studying
conflict.
We
further
demonstrate
how
inputs,
mapping,
can
inform
one
another
understanding
patterns,
drivers,
opportunities
for
Finally,
make
recommendations
improving
interoperability
social
data
about
Collectively
our
offer
approach
fills
gaps
offers
guidance
future
research.
Journal of Applied Ecology,
Journal Year:
2019,
Volume and Issue:
56(8), P. 1905 - 1915
Published: March 9, 2019
Abstract
Large
carnivores
are
expanding
in
Europe,
and
their
return
is
associated
with
conflicts
that
often
result
policies
to
regulate
population
size
through
culling.
Being
wide‐ranging
species,
populations
distributed
across
several
jurisdictions,
which
may
vary
the
extent
they
use
lethal
control.
This
creates
conditions
for
establishment
of
source‐sink
dynamics
borders,
frustrate
ability
countries
reach
respective
management
objectives.
To
explore
consequences
this
issue,
we
constructed
a
vec‐permutation
projection
model,
applied
case
wolverines
south‐central
Scandinavia,
shared
between
Norway
(where
culled)
Sweden
protected).
We
evaluated
effect
compensatory
immigration
on
wolverine
growth
rates,
if
was
influenced
by
distance
national
border.
assessed
what
had
an
influence
number
removals
needed
keep
at
given
rate.
In
Norway,
model
estimated
stable
trend,
whereas
it
produced
10%
annual
increase.
The
corresponded
0.02
reduction
rate
similar
increase
Norway.
strong
closer
Norwegian‐Swedish
border,
but
weak
when
moving
away
from
it.
An
average
33
shot
per
year
Norwegian
part
study
area.
If
no
occurred,
28
would
have
been
sufficient
achieve
same
goal.
About
15.5%
all
individuals
harvested
2005
2012
were
compensated
immigrants,
causing
decrease
Sweden.
Synthesis
applications
.
When
transboundary,
decisions
also
even
though
political
bodies
charge
those
decisions,
stakeholders
who
them,
taxpayers
finance
them
not.
It
important
managers
citizens
be
informed
difference
goals
can
reduce
efficiency,
costs,
wildlife
management.
Elementa Science of the Anthropocene,
Journal Year:
2021,
Volume and Issue:
9(1)
Published: Jan. 1, 2021
As
global
environmental
changes
continue
to
accelerate,
research
and
practice
in
the
field
of
conservation
biology
may
be
essential
help
forestall
precipitous
declines
earth’s
ability
sustain
a
diversity
life.
However,
many
programs
have
faced
scrutiny
for
social
injustices
they
create,
especially
within
paradigm
demarcating
protected
lands.
Currently,
new
emphasizing
landscapes
shared
by
people
wildlife
is
emerging,
with
it,
an
opportunity
ensure
that
justice
both
human
beyond-human
groups
given
consideration.
Here,
we
examine
emblematic
this
paradigm,
reintroduction
recovery
large
carnivore
species,
draw
from
theories
detail
forms
at
stake
these
efforts.
Our
analysis
shows
pluralistic
application
required
practices
do
not
produce
reproduce
people.
In
addition,
show
success
emerging
meeting
their
goals
fact
depends
on
meaningfully
addressing
range
concerns.
By
developing
framework,
also
identify
domains
which
scholarship
can
expand
its
scope.
To
end,
introduce
novel
concept
affective
justice,
describes
complex
role
emotions
as
harms,
disruptors
understanding
other
links
between
logics
oppression.
framework
offers
comprehensive
resource
work
through
planning
implementing
programs,
conclude
describing
challenges
opportunities
further
aligning
practice.