Reviewing studies of degrowth: Are claims matched by data, methods and policy analysis?
Ecological Economics,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
226, P. 108324 - 108324
Published: Sept. 2, 2024
In
the
last
decade
many
publications
have
appeared
on
degrowth
as
a
strategy
to
confront
environmental
and
social
problems.
We
undertake
systematic
review
of
their
content,
data
methods.
This
involves
use
computational
linguistics
identify
main
topics
investigated.
Based
sample
561
studies
we
conclude
that:
(1)
content
covers
11
topics;
(2)
large
majority
(almost
90%)
are
opinions
rather
than
analysis;
(3)
few
quantitative
or
qualitative
data,
even
fewer
ones
formal
modelling;
(4)
first
second
type
tend
include
small
samples
focus
non-representative
cases;
(5)
most
offer
ad
hoc
subjective
policy
advice,
lacking
evaluation
integration
with
insights
from
literature
environmental/climate
policies;
(6)
public
support,
concludes
that
strategies
policies
socially-politically
infeasible;
(7)
various
represent
"reverse
causality"
confusion,
i.e.
term
not
for
deliberate
but
denote
economic
decline
(in
GDP
terms)
resulting
exogenous
factors
(8)
adopt
system-wide
perspective
–
instead
small,
local
cases
without
clear
implication
economy
whole.
illustrate
each
these
findings
concrete
studies.
Language: Английский
Green Growth or Degrowth? Possible Outcomes for Climate and Society
Highlights of Sustainability,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
4(2), P. 69 - 94
Published: March 25, 2025
As
global
temperatures
continue
to
rise,
those
in
favor
of
rapid
climate
mitigation
face
critical
questions
regarding
maintaining
current
levels
economic
growth.
On
a
scale,
there
remains
clear
positive
correlation
between
growth
and
carbon
emissions,
leading
many
scientists
call
for
move
away
from
growth-focused
economy.
In
this
article,
we
draw
recent
research
compare
possible
outcomes
terms
social
well-being
green
degrowth
pathways.
Green
aims
maintain
while
reducing
emissions.
Degrowth
calls
purposeful
contraction
wealthy
countries.
Drawing
studies,
compile
evidence
these
pathways
assess
how
each
key
strategies
is
evaluated
framed
the
literature.
We
find
that
indicates
differences
potential
risks
human
welfare,
future
on
specific
topics
related
transition.
Additionally,
identify
issues
feasibility
as
primary
concerns
within
both
paradigms.
Language: Английский