Given
the
importance
of
environmental
compensations
and
biodiversity
offsets
(i.e.compensations
with
no
net
loss
biodiversity)
for
conservation
their
increasing
use
worldwide,
it
is
critical
to
understand
improve
these
mechanisms.In
this
work,
we
sought
broaden
our
understanding
make
suggestions
improvement,
focusing
on
ways
measure
achieve
ecological
equivalence
in
compensation
trades.First,
reviewed
academic
literature
condition
metrics
used
offsets.We
unraveled
understood
main
limitations
metrics:
frequent
lack
incorporation
three
dimensions
(biodiversity,
landscape
ecosystem
services),
inclusion
many
attributes
highly
aggregated
a
single
formula,
generating
value
as
final
result,
fact
they
were
developed
few
countries,
primarily
from
Global
North
-yet,
are
commonly
applied
other
inclusive
South.Thus,
next
step
was
trying
overcome
by
developing
new
metric.We
created
Disaggregated
Condition
Metric,
which
presents
flexibility
number
identity
included,
always
disaggregated
way.To
metric
simpler,
tested
synergy
trade-off
relationships
identified
those
most
redundant
that
could
be
dismissed,
including
equivalence.Compensation
trades
only
allowed
within
spatial
units
(hexagons
5
10
thousand
hectares)
same
selected
at
end
tests.Using
tropical
biome
Atlantic
Forest
state
São
Paulo
study
system,
were:
bird
richness,
connectivity,
potential
pollination
service.The
Metric
has
high
successfully
transposed
regions,
especially
South.Our
test
application
real
situation.For
this,
Legal
Reserve
scheme
proposed
Brazilian
New
Code.Considering
area
Paulo,
calculated
each
hexagon
values
deficit
surplus
Reserve,
areas
possibly
available
restoration
native
vegetation,
private
an
irregular
situation
public
protected
areas,
where
carried
out,
costs
employing
strategies.We
six
scenarios
performance
strategies,
using
Environmental
trades.We
showed
practically
entire
can
compensated
combination
protection
restoration,
scenario
best
cost-efficiency,
considering
costs,
resolution
increase
forest
cover
(considered
here
"additionality").Therefore,
not
contributed
better
functioning
gaps
offset
compensation,
but
also
possible
create
fills
gaps.Even
more
relevant,
include
scheme,
maintaining
supply
good
costefficiency.We
expect
results
incorporated
into
regulations
policies
related
theme.
Conservation Letters,
Journal Year:
2019,
Volume and Issue:
12(6)
Published: July 17, 2019
Abstract
No
net
loss
(NNL)
biodiversity
policies
mandating
the
application
of
a
mitigation
hierarchy
(avoid,
minimize,
remediate,
offset)
to
ecological
impacts
built
infrastructure
are
proliferating
globally.
However,
little
is
known
about
their
effectiveness
at
achieving
NNL
outcomes.
We
reviewed
English‐language
peer‐reviewed
literature
(capturing
15,715
articles),
and
identified
32
reports
that
observed
outcomes
from
policies,
including
>300,000
ha
offsets.
Approximately
one‐third
individual
offsets
reported
NNL,
primarily
in
wetlands,
although
most
studies
used
widely
criticized
area‐based
outcome
measures.
The
commonly
cited
reason
for
success
was
applying
high
offset
multipliers
(large
area
relative
impacted
area).
large
gaps
between
global
implementation
evidence
effectiveness:
despite
two‐thirds
world's
being
applied
forested
ecosystems,
we
found
none
four
demonstrated
successful
habitats
or
species.
also
no
achievement
using
avoided
(impacts
by
protecting
existing
habitat
elsewhere).
Additionally,
summarized
regional
variability
compliance
rates
with
policies.
As
infrastructural
expansion
accelerates,
must
urgently
improve
evidence‐base
around
efforts
mitigate
development
on
biodiversity.
Sustainability,
Journal Year:
2019,
Volume and Issue:
11(24), P. 6903 - 6903
Published: Dec. 4, 2019
Biodiversity
offsets
are
applied
in
many
countries
to
compensate
for
impacts
on
the
environment,
but
research
regulatory
frameworks
and
implementation
enabling
effective
is
lacking.
This
paper
reviews
biodiversity
offsets,
providing
a
framework
analysis
of
program
design
(no
net
loss
goal,
uncertainty
ratios,
equivalence
accounting,
site
selection,
landscape-scale
mitigation
planning,
timing)
(compliance,
adherence
hierarchy,
leakage
trade-offs,
oversight,
transparency
monitoring).
Some
more
challenging
aspects
concern
proper
metrics
accounting
allowing
evaluation,
as
well
consideration
trade-offs
when
regulations
focus
only
aspect
ecosystems.
Results
can
be
used
assess
anywhere
support
creation
programs
that
balance
development
conservation.