Compensação ambiental como mecanismo de conservação: dos métodos ao teste de cenários baseados no Novo Código Florestal DOI Creative Commons

Clarice Borges Matos

Published: May 23, 2022

Given the importance of environmental compensations and biodiversity offsets (i.e.compensations with no net loss biodiversity) for conservation their increasing use worldwide, it is critical to understand improve these mechanisms.In this work, we sought broaden our understanding make suggestions improvement, focusing on ways measure achieve ecological equivalence in compensation trades.First, reviewed academic literature condition metrics used offsets.We unraveled understood main limitations metrics: frequent lack incorporation three dimensions (biodiversity, landscape ecosystem services), inclusion many attributes highly aggregated a single formula, generating value as final result, fact they were developed few countries, primarily from Global North -yet, are commonly applied other inclusive South.Thus, next step was trying overcome by developing new metric.We created Disaggregated Condition Metric, which presents flexibility number identity included, always disaggregated way.To metric simpler, tested synergy trade-off relationships identified those most redundant that could be dismissed, including equivalence.Compensation trades only allowed within spatial units (hexagons 5 10 thousand hectares) same selected at end tests.Using tropical biome Atlantic Forest state São Paulo study system, were: bird richness, connectivity, potential pollination service.The Metric has high successfully transposed regions, especially South.Our test application real situation.For this, Legal Reserve scheme proposed Brazilian New Code.Considering area Paulo, calculated each hexagon values deficit surplus Reserve, areas possibly available restoration native vegetation, private an irregular situation public protected areas, where carried out, costs employing strategies.We six scenarios performance strategies, using Environmental trades.We showed practically entire can compensated combination protection restoration, scenario best cost-efficiency, considering costs, resolution increase forest cover (considered here "additionality").Therefore, not contributed better functioning gaps offset compensation, but also possible create fills gaps.Even more relevant, include scheme, maintaining supply good costefficiency.We expect results incorporated into regulations policies related theme.

Language: Английский

The ecological outcomes of biodiversity offsets under “no net loss” policies: A global review DOI Creative Commons
Sophus zu Ermgassen,

Julia Baker,

Richard A. Griffiths

et al.

Conservation Letters, Journal Year: 2019, Volume and Issue: 12(6)

Published: July 17, 2019

Abstract No net loss (NNL) biodiversity policies mandating the application of a mitigation hierarchy (avoid, minimize, remediate, offset) to ecological impacts built infrastructure are proliferating globally. However, little is known about their effectiveness at achieving NNL outcomes. We reviewed English‐language peer‐reviewed literature (capturing 15,715 articles), and identified 32 reports that observed outcomes from policies, including >300,000 ha offsets. Approximately one‐third individual offsets reported NNL, primarily in wetlands, although most studies used widely criticized area‐based outcome measures. The commonly cited reason for success was applying high offset multipliers (large area relative impacted area). large gaps between global implementation evidence effectiveness: despite two‐thirds world's being applied forested ecosystems, we found none four demonstrated successful habitats or species. also no achievement using avoided (impacts by protecting existing habitat elsewhere). Additionally, summarized regional variability compliance rates with policies. As infrastructural expansion accelerates, must urgently improve evidence‐base around efforts mitigate development on biodiversity.

Language: Английский

Citations

170

A new methodological framework to assess ecological equivalence in compensation schemes DOI Creative Commons
Clarice Borges-Matos, Pedro Aurélio Costa Lima Pequeno, Marinez Ferreira de Siqueira

et al.

Environmental and Sustainability Indicators, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: unknown, P. 100595 - 100595

Published: Jan. 1, 2025

Language: Английский

Citations

1

Do biodiversity offsets achieve No Net Loss? An evaluation of offsets in a French department DOI Creative Commons
Lucie Bezombes, Christian Kerbiriou, Thomas Spiegelberger

et al.

Biological Conservation, Journal Year: 2019, Volume and Issue: 231, P. 24 - 29

Published: Jan. 11, 2019

Language: Английский

Citations

64

Integrating a landscape connectivity approach into mitigation hierarchy planning by anticipating urban dynamics DOI Creative Commons
Simon Tarabon,

Coralie Calvet,

Vincent Delbar

et al.

Landscape and Urban Planning, Journal Year: 2020, Volume and Issue: 202, P. 103871 - 103871

Published: June 21, 2020

Language: Английский

Citations

62

Environmental mitigation hierarchy and biodiversity offsets revisited through habitat connectivity modelling DOI Creative Commons
Laurent Bergès,

Catherine Avon,

Lucie Bezombes

et al.

Journal of Environmental Management, Journal Year: 2019, Volume and Issue: 256, P. 109950 - 109950

Published: Dec. 5, 2019

Language: Английский

Citations

56

Pooling biodiversity offsets to improve habitat connectivity and species conservation DOI Creative Commons
Simon Tarabon, Thierry Dutoit, Francis Isselin‐Nondedeu

et al.

Journal of Environmental Management, Journal Year: 2020, Volume and Issue: 277, P. 111425 - 111425

Published: Oct. 1, 2020

Language: Английский

Citations

42

A Review of Condition Metrics Used in Biodiversity Offsetting DOI
Clarice Borges-Matos, Martine Maron, Jean Paul Metzger

et al.

Environmental Management, Journal Year: 2023, Volume and Issue: 72(4), P. 727 - 740

Published: July 21, 2023

Language: Английский

Citations

11

Ecological equivalence assessment: The potential of genetic tools, remote sensing and metapopulation models to better apply the mitigation hierarchy DOI Creative Commons

Jules Boileau,

Coralie Calvet,

Sylvain Pioch

et al.

Journal of Environmental Management, Journal Year: 2022, Volume and Issue: 305, P. 114415 - 114415

Published: Jan. 5, 2022

Language: Английский

Citations

17

Biodiversity Offset Program Design and Implementation DOI Open Access
Marie Grimm, Johann Köppel

Sustainability, Journal Year: 2019, Volume and Issue: 11(24), P. 6903 - 6903

Published: Dec. 4, 2019

Biodiversity offsets are applied in many countries to compensate for impacts on the environment, but research regulatory frameworks and implementation enabling effective is lacking. This paper reviews biodiversity offsets, providing a framework analysis of program design (no net loss goal, uncertainty ratios, equivalence accounting, site selection, landscape-scale mitigation planning, timing) (compliance, adherence hierarchy, leakage trade-offs, oversight, transparency monitoring). Some more challenging aspects concern proper metrics accounting allowing evaluation, as well consideration trade-offs when regulations focus only aspect ecosystems. Results can be used assess anywhere support creation programs that balance development conservation.

Language: Английский

Citations

25

Conserving biodiversity through offsets? Findings from an empirical study on conservation banking DOI
Marie Grimm

Journal for Nature Conservation, Journal Year: 2020, Volume and Issue: 57, P. 125871 - 125871

Published: July 17, 2020

Language: Английский

Citations

22