Study on the Spatiotemporal Heterogeneity and Threshold Effects of Ecosystem Services in Honghe Prefecture, Yunnan Province DOI Creative Commons

Xinjun Chen,

Ming Cui,

Qiankun Yang

et al.

Remote Sensing, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: 17(4), P. 566 - 566

Published: Feb. 7, 2025

Uncovering the intricate relationships within realm of ecosystem services (ESs) across various spatial and temporal dimensions, as well their nonlinear with natural–social factors, is a fundamental condition for regional management. This study focuses on Honghe Prefecture, Yunnan Province, it quantifies supply ESs at grid township scales, clarifies interrelationships among influencing elements, proposes cross-scale ecological management strategies. The findings indicate following: (1) exhibited variability. In last 20 years, capacity food production (FP) increased by about 46%, while other showed downward trend. (2) Synergistic effects primarily occurred between WY, habitat quality (HQ), carbon sequestration (CS), soil conservation (SC), trade-off mainly took place FP ESs. (3) Significant dramatic changes in service bundles were observed southern mountainous areas. At scale, overall area integrated bundle declined approximately 88%. However, proportion HQ-CS key synergy from 15.68% to 40.60%. Similar patterns trends also scale. (4) There was notable reduction comprehensive index (ESI) southwest, which human activities climate drought factors played major negative driving role, some had threshold ESI. Existing research often ignores relationship complex spatiotemporal dynamics services. Thus, this constructed cognitive framework ES status perspective “supply–interaction–driving–threshold” ESs, providing more understanding

Language: Английский

Carbon sequestration in soils and climate change mitigation—Definitions and pitfalls DOI Creative Commons
Axel Don, Felix Seidel, Jens Leifeld

et al.

Global Change Biology, Journal Year: 2023, Volume and Issue: 30(1)

Published: Oct. 31, 2023

Abstract The term carbon (C) sequestration has not just become a buzzword but is something of siren's call to scientific communicators and media outlets. Carbon the removal C from atmosphere storage, for example, in soil. It potential partially compensate anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions is, therefore, an important piece global climate change mitigation puzzle. However, often used misleadingly and, while likely unintentional, can lead perpetuation biased conclusions exaggerated expectations about its contribution efforts. Soils have considerable take up many are also state continuous loss. In such soils, measures build soil may only reduction losses (C loss mitigation) rather than result real negative emissions. examination 100 recent peer‐reviewed papers on topics surrounding C, 4% were found correctly. Furthermore, 13% equated with stocks. review, further, revealed that leading will always when non‐CO 2 gases leakage taken into consideration. This paper highlights pitfalls using incorrectly calls accurate usage this going forward. Revised new terms suggested distinguish clearly between SOC mitigation, emissions, accrual avoid miscommunication among scientists stakeholder groups future.

Language: Английский

Citations

75

Drivers of ecosystem services and their trade-offs and synergies in different land use policy zones of Shaanxi Province, China DOI
Yue Yang,

Xuefeng Yuan,

Jianji An

et al.

Journal of Cleaner Production, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 452, P. 142077 - 142077

Published: April 4, 2024

Language: Английский

Citations

36

Achieving the supply-demand balance of ecosystem services through zoning regulation based on land use thresholds DOI
Xiaoqing Zhao, Yifei Xu, Junwei Pu

et al.

Land Use Policy, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 139, P. 107056 - 107056

Published: Feb. 2, 2024

Language: Английский

Citations

26

Exploring the interrelations and driving factors among typical ecosystem services in the Yangtze river economic Belt, China DOI

Liujie He,

Zeyang Xie,

Hanqing Wu

et al.

Journal of Environmental Management, Journal Year: 2023, Volume and Issue: 351, P. 119794 - 119794

Published: Dec. 10, 2023

Language: Английский

Citations

37

Study on the impact of vegetation change on ecosystem services in the Loess Plateau, China DOI Creative Commons

Haihong Qiu,

Jiaying Zhang,

Hairong Han

et al.

Ecological Indicators, Journal Year: 2023, Volume and Issue: 154, P. 110812 - 110812

Published: Aug. 27, 2023

Vegetation change has a non-negligible role in the impact of ecosystem services (ESs). Quantitative assessment vegetation is basis for sustainable regional development. Using Chinese Loess Plateau (LP) as study area, this firstly analysed spatial and temporal characteristics used Geodetector model to reveal driving mechanism. Next, applied InVEST quantitatively assess four carbon storage, habitat quality, soil conservation water yield, explored service balance through type transfer. The results showed that (1) there was trend towards an increase area all types, with sparse being most pronounced. Areas damaged were concentrated urban peripheral areas, well wasteland bare ground. (2) Annual precipitation, types cumulative afforestation ratio main drivers on LP. (3) Restoration woodland enhanced quality retention LP, while yield decreased by 31.66%. restoration did not enhance services. This may provide reference management ecosystems.

Language: Английский

Citations

27

A new framework for multi-level territorial spatial zoning management: Integrating ecosystem services supply-demand balance and land use structure DOI
Yifei Xu, Xiaoqing Zhao,

Pei Huang

et al.

Journal of Cleaner Production, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 441, P. 141053 - 141053

Published: Jan. 31, 2024

Language: Английский

Citations

13

Identification and management of priority regulation areas based on the supply–demand relationship of ecosystem services: A case study of the Loess Plateau DOI Creative Commons

Yuhe Ma,

Hai Chen, Di Liu

et al.

Ecological Indicators, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 159, P. 111754 - 111754

Published: Feb. 1, 2024

Effectively identifying and managing the priority regulation areas (PRAs) of ecosystem services (ESs) are very important for improving supply–demand relationship (SDR) ESs promoting regional sustainable development. Based on InVEST model, geographic information system (GIS) spatial analysis statistical methods, this study assessed supply demand five types in Loess Plateau from 2000 to 2020, namely, water yield, food supply, carbon storage, soil conservation recreation. The quantitative relationships between were analyzed, PRA with a severe imbalance ES was identified. According index, importance different PRAs Then, potential constraints trade-off synergy SDR discussed, specific suggestions proposed. results showed that increased except demand, distribution mostly low northwest high southeast, or center surrounded by values. degree surplus recreation area decreased, while other increased. Regarding storage recreation, supply–low clustering largest; regarding ESs, largest. supply-low showing trend narrowing northwest. high-demand deficit areas, there various types. In each province, where is no overlap type has highest regulation. For several overlap, targeted measures need be formulated combination trade-offs synergies SDRs.

Language: Английский

Citations

11

A new model based on coupling coordination analysis incorporates the development rate for urbanization and ecosystem services assessment: A case of the Yangtze River Delta DOI Creative Commons
Zhijie Yang,

Jingxuan Hu,

Zi-An Wang

et al.

Ecological Indicators, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 159, P. 111596 - 111596

Published: Jan. 25, 2024

Understanding the dynamic relationship between ecosystem service supply and urbanization demand, identifying underlying influencing mechanisms are crucial for sustainable development in global process. However, current studies mainly focused on coupling coordination of situation, rather than system. Thus, we introduced concept degree (DCCD) to address research gap. This study calculated rates composite index (ESSCI) demand (UDDCI) from 2000 2020 construct DCCD model case Yangtze River Delta region. Subsequently, analysed inherent causing regional differences DCCD. Our results indicated that (1) ESSCI UDDCI showed spatiotemporal heterogeneity, rate had significant north south, decreased east west. (2) In 2020, notable existed northern southern region, with zone being lower. The situation improved 2005 2015. (3) Global habitat quality a impact coordination. north, annual water yield significantly influenced coordination, while carbon sequestration it. These factors related land use. We into old achieve goals.

Language: Английский

Citations

10

Defining the land use area threshold and optimizing its structure to improve supply-demand balance state of ecosystem services DOI

Pei Huang,

Xiaoqing Zhao, Junwei Pu

et al.

Journal of Geographical Sciences, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 34(5), P. 891 - 920

Published: May 1, 2024

Language: Английский

Citations

10

Understanding sustainability of woody species suitability zones on the Loess Plateau for optimal creation zone selection in response to future climate change DOI

Haihong Qiu,

Hairong Han, Xiaoqin Cheng

et al.

Journal of Environmental Management, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: 375, P. 124239 - 124239

Published: Jan. 29, 2025

Language: Английский

Citations

1