Ecological Indicators,
Journal Year:
2022,
Volume and Issue:
146, P. 109827 - 109827
Published: Dec. 21, 2022
In
karst
mountainous
area,
the
strong
spatial
heterogeneity
of
natural
geography
and
complexity
human
activities
have
led
to
significant
variability
uncertainty
in
process
ecosystem
services
(ESs).
The
trade-offs/synergies
ESs
its
driving
forces
change
with
space
significantly,
which
are
not
only
related
environment
but
also
affected
by
socioeconomic
factors.
Clarifying
distribution
compositional
structure
ecological
functional
zone
understanding
main
factors
trade-offs
synergies
among
multiple
essential
for
scientific
management
restoration
ecosystems.
objective
this
study
was
explore
each
service
bundle
(ESB)
develop
differentiated
strategies
based
on
characteristics.
study,
six
(i.e.,
water
yield
(WY),
soil
conservation
(SC),
net
primary
productivity
(NPP),
habitat
quality
(HQ),
recreation
(RS),
food
production
(FP))
were
quantified
Wujiang
Basin.
Based
this,
land
use
types
coldspots/hotspots
analyzed.
Then,
K-means
algorithm
used
identify
ESBs.
According
structural
characteristics
ESBs,
zones
divided.
Furthermore,
their
ESB
analyzed
using
Pearson
correlation
analysis
geographical
detector.
results
showed
that
significantly
ES
coldspots/hotspots.
hotspots
mainly
concentrated
forest
areas,
while
coldspots
urban
farmland
areas.
distributions
features
Basin
divided
into
supply
transition
cultural
balance
area.
There
synergistic
relationships
between
SC
WY
NPP
every
zone.
Precipitation
interactions
other
influenced
trade-off
FP
both
area
normalized
difference
vegetation
index
(NDVI)
dominant
factor
pattern
This
deeper
provides
a
basis
territorial
planning
optimization
Resources Conservation and Recycling,
Journal Year:
2022,
Volume and Issue:
189, P. 106767 - 106767
Published: Nov. 17, 2022
Uncovering
the
complex
interactions
among
ecosystem
services
(ESs)
is
a
prerequisite
for
managing
multiple
ESs
simultaneously.
We
mapped
supply
of
six
ESs,
quantified
their
trade-offs/synergies
and
bundles,
determined
dominant
social-ecological
drivers,
subsequently
provided
sustainable
spatial
planning
management
strategies
at
both
grid
sub-watershed
scales.
The
results
revealed
that:
(1)
patterns
were
spatially
heterogeneous,
with
food
production
decreasing
most,
by
14.86%
(grid
scale)
17%
(sub-watershed
scale),
water
increasing
22.46%
22.57%
from
2000
to
2020;
(2)
ten
ES
pairs
presented
synergies
while
five
related
showed
trade-offs
scales,
three
scale
two
experiencing
declined
or
increased
trade-offs;
(3)
our
spatial-temporal
cross-scale
analysis
identified
as
an
additional
priority
in
bundles
zoning
basis
similarities
divergences
drivers
different
scales
require
linkage
distinct
focus
Thus,
we
integrated
knowledge
on
into
underpin
across
Ecosystem Services,
Journal Year:
2019,
Volume and Issue:
37, P. 100938 - 100938
Published: May 16, 2019
Recent
developments
in
Ecosystem
Service
(ES)
research
show
a
growing
interest
the
concept
of
ES
bundles
for
informing
effective
management
landscapes.
While
supply
was
biophysically
assessed,
there
has
been
little
about
perception
bundles,
neither
terms
their
supply,
nor
demand.
This
investigates
how
various
stakeholders
perceive
delivery
across
different
landscapes
and
this
differs
from
demand
they
request.
A
questionnaire
survey
(n
=
858)
carried
out
on
basis
landscape
photographs
with
local
farmers,
inhabitants,
visitors
region
South
Tyrol
Central
Alps.
The
results
that
stakeholder
groups
identify
identical
(i.e.
experiential
service,
life
maintenance
agroservice
bundle)
associate
each
similar
set
types.
Stakeholders,
however,
differ
expressed
bundles.
These
findings
suggest
experience
(spatial)
mismatches
between
ES,
potentially
leading
to
conflicts
management.
study
concludes
by
discussing
these
potential
context
future
land
use
decisions.
