Services provided by multifunctional agroecosystems: Questions, obstacles and solutions DOI Creative Commons
Alexia Stokes, Géraldine Bocquého,

Pascal Carrère

et al.

Ecological Engineering, Journal Year: 2023, Volume and Issue: 191, P. 106949 - 106949

Published: April 3, 2023

Agroecosystems are facing new challenges in the context of a growing and increasingly interconnected human population, paradigm shift is needed to successfully address many complex questions that these will generate. The transition providing multiple services within an agroecosystem starting point for heightened multifunctionality, however, there still hesitation among stakeholders about moving towards multi-service systems, largely because lack knowledge linking productivity multifunctionality. We reason much this reticence could be overcome through better understanding stakeholder requirements innovative transdisciplinary research extended dimensions time space. assembled experts France identify priority co-constructing projects with stakeholders. identified 18 key questions, as well obstacles hinder their resolution propose potential solutions tackling obstacles. illustrate into multifunctionality service production must hugely collaborative effort needs integrate from different sectors communities. Promoting dialogue, standardization data-sharing would enhance progress. Biodiversity highlighted factor explore incorporate modelling approaches, but major advances made dynamic changes biodiversity-function-service nexus across landscapes. Resolving allow us translate decision objectives, adaptation tipping points agroecosystems develop social-ecological economic pathways adaptive over time.

Language: Английский

Revision of the Common International Classification for Ecosystem Services (CICES V5.1): A Policy Brief DOI Creative Commons

Roy Haines‐Young,

Marion Potschin-Young

One Ecosystem, Journal Year: 2018, Volume and Issue: 3, P. e27108 - e27108

Published: June 11, 2018

The Common International Classification of Ecosystem Services (CICES) is widely used for mapping, ecosystem assessment, and natural capital accounting. On the basis experience gained in using it since first version was published 2013, has been updated 5.1. This policy brief summarises what done how classification can be used.

Language: Английский

Citations

977

Evaluation of cultural ecosystem services: A review of methods DOI
Xin Cheng,

Sylvie Van Damme,

Luyuan Li

et al.

Ecosystem Services, Journal Year: 2019, Volume and Issue: 37, P. 100925 - 100925

Published: April 2, 2019

Language: Английский

Citations

302

Understanding the spatial relationships and drivers of ecosystem service supply-demand mismatches towards spatially-targeted management of social-ecological system DOI
Jiashu Shen, Shuangcheng Li, Huan Wang

et al.

Journal of Cleaner Production, Journal Year: 2023, Volume and Issue: 406, P. 136882 - 136882

Published: March 31, 2023

Language: Английский

Citations

99

A framework for integrating ecosystem services indicators into vulnerability and risk assessments of deltaic social-ecological systems DOI Creative Commons
Yuting Peng, Natalie Welden, Fabrice G. Renaud

et al.

Journal of Environmental Management, Journal Year: 2022, Volume and Issue: 326, P. 116682 - 116682

Published: Nov. 11, 2022

Due to increasing population pressure and urbanization, as well global climate change impacts, many coastal river deltas are experiencing increased exposure, vulnerability risks linked natural hazards. Mapping the risk profiles of is critical for developing preparedness, mitigation adaptation policies strategies. Current assessments focus predominantly on social factors, typically, do not systematically incorporate a social-ecological systems perspective, which can lead incomplete assessments. We argue that ecosystem services, link both functions human well-being, be used better characterize mutual dependencies between society environment within assessment frameworks. Thus, building existing frameworks, we propose revised indicator-based framework delta environments, supported by list service indicators were identified using systematic literature review. This improved an effective tool address in deltas, enabling multi-hazard across allows more targeted development management measures aimed at reducing from

Language: Английский

Citations

91

Impacts of climate-induced drought on lake and reservoir biodiversity and ecosystem services: A review DOI
Xinyu Sun, Margaret Armstrong,

Alireza Moradi

et al.

AMBIO, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: unknown

Published: Jan. 8, 2025

Language: Английский

Citations

2

Protected Area management: Fusion and confusion with the ecosystem services approach DOI Creative Commons
Christiaan Hummel, Dimitris Poursanidis, Daniel E. Orenstein

et al.

The Science of The Total Environment, Journal Year: 2018, Volume and Issue: 651, P. 2432 - 2443

Published: Oct. 6, 2018

For many years, Protected Areas (PA) have been an important tool for conserving nature. Recently, also societal aspects introduced into PA management via the introduction of Ecosystem Services (ES) approach. This review discusses historical background PAs, management, and ES We then discuss relevance applicability approach including different definitions ES, classification methods, ways in which are measured. conclude that there still major challenges ahead using so recommendations given on way should be integrated management.

Language: Английский

Citations

99

Towards integrating the ecosystem services cascade framework within the Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) cause-effect methodology DOI
Benedetto Rugani,

Danielle Maia de Souza,

Bo P. Weidema

et al.

The Science of The Total Environment, Journal Year: 2019, Volume and Issue: 690, P. 1284 - 1298

Published: July 5, 2019

Language: Английский

Citations

98

Farmland abandonment decreases the fire regulation capacity and the fire protection ecosystem service in mountain landscapes DOI
Ângelo Sil, Paulo M. Fernandes, Ana Paula de Castro Rodrigues

et al.

Ecosystem Services, Journal Year: 2019, Volume and Issue: 36, P. 100908 - 100908

Published: March 13, 2019

Language: Английский

Citations

79

Spatial-temporal dynamic evaluation of the ecosystem service value from the perspective of “production-living-ecological” spaces: A case study in Dongliao River Basin, China DOI
Yongfang Wang,

Xiaoyu Liao,

Zhijun Tong

et al.

Journal of Cleaner Production, Journal Year: 2021, Volume and Issue: 333, P. 130218 - 130218

Published: Dec. 20, 2021

Language: Английский

Citations

79

Ecosystem services in the Swedish water-energy-food-land-climate nexus: Anthropogenic pressures and physical interactions DOI Creative Commons
Lotte van den Heuvel, Małgorzata Blicharska,

Sara Masia

et al.

Ecosystem Services, Journal Year: 2020, Volume and Issue: 44, P. 101141 - 101141

Published: July 2, 2020

Traditionally, challenges of natural resource management have been addressed with a sectoral policy approach. However, it is increasingly recognised that different sectors are interconnected in complex and mutually interacting system. A nexus approach proposed to identify synergies trade-offs between foster the sustainable efficient use resources, particularly light climate change. The has led studies identifying interactions objectives across sectors, but physical can be result interactions, received less attention. Nevertheless, such severe consequences for environment, affecting ecosystems services they provide. Integrating ecosystem service concept may help better understand pressures impacts related address trade-offs. In this study, literature expert assessment used analyse water-energy-food-land-climate Sweden through lens gain insights into sectors. By demonstrating how anthropogenic originating from affect functions services, paper serves as foundation further inform making (within outside Sweden) when considering nexus.

Language: Английский

Citations

70