Social-ecological impacts on forest conservation and restoration in Pan-tropical Asia Karst
Environmental Impact Assessment Review,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
114, P. 107962 - 107962
Published: May 2, 2025
Language: Английский
Evaluation of the stand quality of Casuarina equisetifolia in coastal shelterbelts
Yu Chen,
No information about this author
Zhihong Cao,
No information about this author
Yu Chen
No information about this author
et al.
Journal of Mountain Science,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
unknown
Published: April 30, 2025
Language: Английский
Linking canopy gap features and microhabitat heterogeneity with seedling regeneration in a mixed coastal shelterbelt forest of eastern China
Hongtao Xie,
No information about this author
Mengyuan Chang,
No information about this author
Binghui Bao
No information about this author
et al.
Forest Ecology and Management,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
571, P. 122259 - 122259
Published: Sept. 3, 2024
Language: Английский
Delineating Ecological Functional Zones and Grades for Multi-Scale Ecosystem Management
Land,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
13(10), P. 1624 - 1624
Published: Oct. 6, 2024
Integrating
ecosystem
services
(ESs)
to
delineate
ecological
functional
zones
(EFZs)
is
fundamental
in
terrestrial
spatial
planning
and
management.
However,
existing
studies
have
largely
overlooked
the
refinement
of
EFZs
at
local
scales,
which
hinders
targeted
multi-scale
This
study
introduced
a
“two-step
zoning
method”
address
this
gap,
first
using
self-organizing
feature
mapping
method
township
scale,
then
applying
hotspot
overlay
analysis
refine
resulting
by
designating
them
with
different
grades
village
scale.
The
proposed
was
applied
Wuhan
City,
dividing
it
into
five
types
ES
combinations
land
use
compositions.
Furthermore,
5.23%
villages
were
identified
as
level
I
areas
EFZs,
serving
advantageous
dominant
ESs
area.
On
basis,
diversified
management
strategies
conservation
priorities
proposed.
provides
theoretical
methodological
reference
for
sustainable
Language: Английский
Enhancing Forestation Carbon Sinks in China: A Comparative Analysis of New and Traditional Market Incentive Frameworks
zongshun Wang,
No information about this author
Daojun Zhang,
No information about this author
Xiaohui Tian
No information about this author
et al.
Published: Jan. 1, 2024
New
markets
for
ecosystem
services
have
been
proposed
as
a
way
to
diversity
landowner's
revenues
from
forestation.
This
study
examines
differences
in
China's
forestation
carbon
sinks
under
new
and
traditional
market
incentive
frameworks.
We
found
that
China
could
biophysically
sequester
209.77
Mt
CO2
annually
through
forestation,
but
due
lower
prices,
only
less
than
40%
of
this
potential
was
currently
investable.
Under
the
scenario,
investable
area,
sink
potential,
costs
were
roughly
double,
1.32
times,
half
those
observed
market,
respectively.
intensity
reforestation
1.54
times
great
afforestation,
with
its
being
about
afforestation's.
These
findings
can
provide
valuable
recommendations
policymakers.
Language: Английский