Navigating uncertainty in life cycle assessment‐based approaches to biodiversity footprinting
Methods in Ecology and Evolution,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
unknown
Published: March 9, 2025
Abstract
The
use
of
life
cycle
assessment
(LCA)
methods
is
rapidly
expanding
as
a
means
estimating
the
biodiversity
impacts
organisations
across
complex
value
chains.
However,
these
have
limitations
and
substantial
uncertainties,
which
are
rarely
communicated
in
results
LCAs.
Drawing
upon
ecological
LCA
literature
on
uncertainty
two
worked
examples
footprinting,
we
outline
where
different
types
occur
multiple
stages
LCA,
from
input
data
to
choice
metric.
Some
uncertainties
epistemic,
incorporating
structural
(e.g.
pressures
included
models),
parametric
around
characterisation
factors
information
gaps)
measurement
uncertainty,
well
natural
variability,
stochasticity.
Other
linguistic
ambiguity
definitions
biodiversity)
decision‐based
choices
made
when
matching
company
inventory
categories).
Based
this
review,
provide
suggestions
for
(i)
understanding,
reducing
navigating
footprinting
(ii)
ensuring
robust
appropriate
techniques
part
broader
organisational
strategies.
Understanding
risks
posed
by
weighing
them
against
costs
inappropriate
action
or
inaction
decisions
vital
designing
effective
By
appreciating
opportunities
exist
utilise
LCAs
high‐level
risk
screening
prioritise
highlight
areas
focused
effort
more
granular
needed
track
progress
towards
abating
year‐on‐year
identify
low‐risk
actions.
recommend
strategies
should
not
be
based
solely
absolute
impact
results.
Instead,
used
alongside
other
approaches
guide
location‐specific
deliver
nature‐positive
future.
Language: Английский
A critical life cycle assessment of present and potential rare earth circularity routes from permanent magnets
Resources Conservation and Recycling,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
215, P. 108106 - 108106
Published: Dec. 31, 2024
Language: Английский
Life Cycle Greenhouse Gas Reduction Effects Induced by Turbocharger Multiple Remanufacturing in South Korea
Da Yeon Kim,
No information about this author
Jong Hyo Lee,
No information about this author
Yong Woo Hwang
No information about this author
et al.
Energies,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
17(24), P. 6248 - 6248
Published: Dec. 11, 2024
In
light
of
growing
global
supply
chain
instability
and
carbon
neutrality
initiatives,
South
Korea
has
highlighted
the
need
for
a
circular
economy
to
reduce
its
reliance
on
natural
resources.
As
critical
strategy
promoting
economy,
remanufacturing
become
essential
because
ability
improve
resource
efficiency
environmental
impacts.
The
automotive
sector,
which
accounts
80%
industry,
plays
role
in
these
efforts.
Turbochargers,
primarily
made
cast
iron,
represent
approximately
20%
sales
this
sector
are
significant
contributors
greenhouse
gas
emissions,
making
them
an
important
target
emission
reduction.
This
study
examined
emissions
associated
with
turbochargers
across
multiple
cycles
using
LCA
method.
results
indicated
approximate
decrease
50%,
48%,
46%,
based
comparative
analysis
between
brand-new
products
those
remanufactured
one
three
times.
Comparing
does
not
fully
capture
key
advantage
remanufacturing.
lies
extend
product’s
life
cycle
by
core
parts
as
primary
raw
materials
reducing
consumption
new
Therefore,
it
is
consider
impact
within
expanded
process,
where
included
entire
cycle.
Using
approach,
accumulated
annual
reduction
effect
decreases
25%,
32%,
35%
one,
two,
or
times,
respectively,
compared
only
products.
shows
that
reduces
use
particular,
repeated,
product
lifespan
can
be
extended
from
3
years
up
12
concomitant
emissions.
These
findings
provide
valuable
data
modeling
encouraging
potential
driven
various
industrial
sectors.
Language: Английский
Comparative Analysis of Global Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) Standards and Guidelines in the Steel Industry
Da Yeon Kim,
No information about this author
Seong Jin Cho,
No information about this author
Chang Youn Oh
No information about this author
et al.
Journal of the Korean Society of Mineral and Energy Resources Engineers,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
61(6), P. 500 - 509
Published: Dec. 31, 2024
Life
Cycle
Assessment
(LCA)
studies
often
yield
varying
environmental
impact
results
owing
to
differences
in
research
objectives,
scope,
and
criteria.
These
inconsistencies
have
led
international
concerns
about
assessment
standards,
highlighting
the
need
for
a
unified
framework.
However,
comprehensive
analyses
of
LCA
guidelines,
particularly
within
steel
industry,
are
lacking.
This
study
analyzed
standards
guidelines
ILCD
Handbook,
PAS
2050,
ISO
20915,
WSA,
RS,
GSCC,
International
EPD,
Korean
EPD.
Key
phrases
such
as
functional
units,
system
boundaries,
allocation
methods
were
compared,
revealing
considerable
inconsistencies,
boundary
definitions
procedures.
To
improve
analyses,
clearer
explanations
criteria
site-specific
considerations
essential.
improvements
would
enhance
methodological
consistency
efficiency
applications.
Language: Английский