Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 187, P. 108988 - 108988
Published: Sept. 23, 2024
Language: Английский
Journal of Building Engineering, Journal Year: 2023, Volume and Issue: 80, P. 107984 - 107984
Published: Oct. 25, 2023
Language: Английский
Citations
29
Thin-Walled Structures, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 205, P. 112389 - 112389
Published: Aug. 30, 2024
Language: Английский
Citations
13
Journal of Building Engineering, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 84, P. 108607 - 108607
Published: Jan. 28, 2024
Rocking structural systems have been proposed as a promising solution for designing resilient building structures. These low-damage can prevent significant economic losses associated with repair, demolition, and business downtime following earthquakes. The importance of buildings resilience rapid recovery has realized from the impacts past earthquakes, such 2010–2011 Christchurch, 2009 L'Aquila, 2016–2017 Central Italy Prior research evaluated applications rocking in buildings, bridges, foundations. However, despite proof their effectiveness historical structures demonstrated efficiency modern through extensive research, not widely used practice to date. purpose this review is two-fold. Firstly, undertaken provide concise but comprehensive overview on different materials, including steel, concrete, masonry, wood. Secondly, collecting, organizing, analyzing studies aims probe literature determine what challenges exist adopting industry projects. By identifying unexplored areas, unresolved issues, remaining challenges, recommends topics future hope facilitating greater adoption self-centering Some key issues include lack provisions current seismic design standards well concerns related behavior rocking-enabled possible adverse effect impact at base columns, amplified demands due higher mode effects, deformation compatibility gravity framing nonstructural components.
Language: Английский
Citations
9
Engineering Structures, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: 335, P. 120346 - 120346
Published: April 21, 2025
Language: Английский
Citations
0
Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: 195, P. 109428 - 109428
Published: April 8, 2025
Language: Английский
Citations
0
Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: unknown
Published: Dec. 12, 2024
ABSTRACT Two columns of RC double‐column medium‐height bents (DCMBs) are normally connected by link beams to enhance the lateral stability. Serious damage and/or large residual displacement were repeatedly observed in DCMBs after major earthquakes, which may make bridges lose traffic functionality or even be demolished and rebuilt. To seismic performance bridge structures with DCMB beams, self‐centering energy dissipation braces (SCEBs) applied “K”‐shaped arrangement scenario replace traditional this study. end, design philosophies SCEBs first developed based on configuration force analysis SCEBs. Then, 1:4 scaled specimens designed. Based hysteretic DCMB, a novel SCEB U‐shaped steel plates (SCEB‐U) was tested, test results showed that SCEB‐U exhibited typical flag‐shaped behavior great deformation capacity. Subsequently, quasi‐static cyclic loading specimen carried out, (EDBs) (DCMB EDB‐Us) also tested for comparison. The experimental suffered least compared there no obvious column‐brace connection regions. SCEB‐Us excellent flag‐type hysteresis carrying capacity, stable dissipation, satisfactory ability.
Language: Английский
Citations
1
Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 187, P. 108988 - 108988
Published: Sept. 23, 2024
Language: Английский
Citations
1