Time, justice, and urban nature: procedural barriers to multi-species flourishing DOI Creative Commons
Josephine Gillespie, Dan Penny, Rebecca Hamilton

et al.

npj Urban Sustainability, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: 5(1)

Published: April 25, 2025

Language: Английский

Equal distribution of new energy in urban low-carbon renewal: Opportunities and challenges DOI Creative Commons

Dingyue Cui,

Tao Zhang, Chuck Wah Yu

et al.

Indoor and Built Environment, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: unknown

Published: March 17, 2025

Language: Английский

Citations

0
Is It Just Planning? Unpacking Markers of Justice in Spatial Planning Literature DOI Creative Commons
Claudia Rot, Wendy Tan, Barbara Tempels

et al.

Journal of Planning Literature, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: unknown

Published: March 21, 2025

This systematic literature review explores justice operationalization in spatial planning, examining key markers, domains, and conceptions. Clarity definition can advance the discourse beyond processes or outcomes. Our reveals prevalence of implicit egalitarian values through words like “equity” “equality,” while pluralistic markers “participation” allow for varied interpretations depending on context. The relationship between procedural distributive justice, though rarely addressed, has clear reciprocal effects. research calls transparency alignment academics practitioners, bridging ethical theories real-world challenges to contribute a more just planning approach.

Language: Английский

Citations

0
Nature-based Solutions as Building Blocks for coastal flood risk reduction: a model-based ecosystem service assessment DOI Creative Commons
Massimiliano Marino, Martin J. Baptist,

Ahmad I K Alkharoubi

et al.

Scientific Reports, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: 15(1)

Published: April 9, 2025

Nature-based Solutions (NbS) are increasingly recognized as effective measures for mitigating flood risks and enhancing climate change adaptation. However, evaluating their efficacy in delivering risk reduction ecosystem service (FRR-ESS) is usually limited by reliance on qualitative, expert-based "quick-scan" scoring methods. While already challenging present-day evaluations, this limitation becomes even more significant when addressing future scenarios, introducing deep uncertainties the evaluation. The present study introduces a model-based framework to quantify FRR-ESS provided coastal NbS, which integrates assessments with quantitative results from an eco-hydro-morphodynamic numerical model. model enables comparative evaluation of individual combined effects NbS following Building Blocks approach. By integrating habitat map prediction evaluation, response storm scenarios (i.e. wave sea level rise) investigated. methodology applied Mediterranean lagoon Sicily (Italy), can be easily adapted diverse ecosystems. Our findings underscore role habitats reducing highlight importance physically-based modelling into This approach provides robust flexible tool policymakers stakeholders make informed decisions that support both ecological sustainability disaster reduction.

Language: Английский

Citations

0
Introducing the environmental justice perspective in the evaluation of NbS implementation; Chania, Crete case study DOI Creative Commons

Thodoros Glytsos,

Angeliki Mavrigiannaki,

Eleftheria Kalogirou

et al.

Energy and Buildings, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: unknown, P. 115736 - 115736

Published: April 1, 2025

Language: Английский

Citations

0
Time, justice, and urban nature: procedural barriers to multi-species flourishing DOI Creative Commons
Josephine Gillespie, Dan Penny, Rebecca Hamilton

et al.

npj Urban Sustainability, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: 5(1)

Published: April 25, 2025

Language: Английский

Citations

0