Energy Research & Social Science,
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
105, P. 103277 - 103277
Published: Sept. 15, 2023
Energy
transformations
not
only
evoke
multi-dimensional
claims
for
just
distribution,
recognition,
and
procedures,
but
also
reveal
how
these
depend
on
shape
the
spatial
context
that
they
address.
The
aim
of
this
contribution
is
to
provide
a
framework
connects
aspects
justice
in
energy
transition
research.
It
builds
literature
fields
studies
justice.
While
relevance
considering
space
scale
socio-technical
transitions
widely
acknowledged,
conceptual
can
help
connect
spatiality
support
scrutiny
their
interconnections.
present
work
seeks
address
gap
by
incorporating
contributions
from
political
geography
theory.
Accordingly,
it
discusses
central
intersections
moral–spatial
tension
field.
Spatial
are
conceptualized
as
referring
at
same
time
moral
(substance-related)
dimensions
(in)justice
relating
both
each
other.
paper
conceptualizes
refer
multiple
scales,
center-periphery
relations,
interterritorial
infrastructure-related
concerns
well
place-based
attachments.
positioning
actors
moral-spatial
field
reference
directional
patterns
responsibility
effect.
Attention
further
discloses
processes
boundary
construction,
perpetuation,
contestation
regional
entrenchment
shared
claims.
Transformation-related
institutions
affected
regions
various
publicly
related
Social Inclusion,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
12
Published: Jan. 25, 2024
The
notion
of
just
transition
is
important
and
debated
in
discussions
about
climate
change
low‐carbon
shifts.
This
study
aims
to
refocus
on
from
a
spatial
perspective.
We
investigate
perceptions
Chun’an,
Zhejiang,
redefine
beyond
Western
ideas.
Our
case
offers
one
key
yet
under‐explored
dimension
the
interpretation
justice:
scale.
First,
green
Chun’an
can
be
regarded
both
as
sacrifice
economy
local
perspective
(Chun’an
county)
valuable
social
contribution
broader
regional
(Hangzhou
city
area).
Second,
multi‐scalar
interaction
process
shapes
justice.
It
represented
by
growing
tensions
between
developmentalism
environmentalism.
Such
aimed
at
generating
wider
scale
well‐being,
contributing
of/for
argue
spatially
sensitive
towards
(rather
than
of)
In
China,
realizing
way
justice,
justice
itself
long
run.
Journal of Planning Literature,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
unknown
Published: March 21, 2025
This
systematic
literature
review
explores
justice
operationalization
in
spatial
planning,
examining
key
markers,
domains,
and
conceptions.
Clarity
definition
can
advance
the
discourse
beyond
processes
or
outcomes.
Our
reveals
prevalence
of
implicit
egalitarian
values
through
words
like
“equity”
“equality,”
while
pluralistic
markers
“participation”
allow
for
varied
interpretations
depending
on
context.
The
relationship
between
procedural
distributive
justice,
though
rarely
addressed,
has
clear
reciprocal
effects.
research
calls
transparency
alignment
academics
practitioners,
bridging
ethical
theories
real-world
challenges
to
contribute
a
more
just
planning
approach.
