bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory),
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
unknown
Published: Jan. 5, 2024
Abstract
Our
propensity
to
materiality,
which
consists
in
using,
making,
creating,
and
passing
on
technologies,
has
enabled
us
shape
the
physical
world
according
our
ends.
To
explain
this
proclivity,
scientists
have
calibrated
their
lens
either
low-level
skills
such
as
motor
cognition
or
high-level
language
social
cognition.
Yet,
little
been
said
about
intermediate-level
cognitive
processes
that
are
directly
involved
mastering
is,
technical
We
aim
focus
intermediate
level
for
providing
new
insights
into
neurocognitive
bases
of
human
materiality.
Here
we
show
a
technical-reasoning
process
might
be
specifically
at
work
problem-solving
situations.
found
via
two
distinct
neuroimaging
studies
area
PF
(parietal
F)
within
left
parietal
lobe
is
central
reasoning
both
tool-use
non-tool-use
can
along
with
social-cognitive
resolve
day-to-day
interactions
combine
constraints.
results
demonstrate
existence
specific
module
brain
dedicated
supporting
pillar
allowing
accumulation
knowledge
over
generations.
Intensifying
research
could
nurture
comprehensive
framework
missing
fields
interested
how
early
modern
humans
interacting
through
technology,
interaction
shaped
history
culture.
Physics of Life Reviews,
Journal Year:
2022,
Volume and Issue:
43, P. 211 - 238
Published: Oct. 21, 2022
A
mere
few
decades
ago,
culture
was
thought
a
unique
human
attribute.
Evidence
to
the
contrary
accumulated
through
latter
part
of
twentieth
century
and
has
exploded
in
present
one,
demonstrating
transmission
traditions
social
learning
across
all
principal
vertebrate
taxa
even
invertebrates,
notably
insects.
The
scope
is
nevertheless
highly
distinctive.
What
makes
our
cultural
capacities
their
cognitive
underpinnings
so
different?
In
this
article
I
argue
that
behavioural
scientists'
endeavours
answer
question,
fruitful
research
pathways
ensuing
discoveries
have
come
exist
alongside
popular,
yet
light
current
empirical
evidence,
questionable
scenarios
scientific
blind
alleys.
particularly
re-evaluate
theories
rely
on
centrality
supposed
uniquely
capacity
for
imitative
copying
explaining
distinctive
massive
cumulative
evolution
(CCE)
species.
most
extreme
versions
perspective
suffer
logical
incoherence
severe
limits
testability.
By
contrast
field
generated
range
rigorous
observational
experimental
methodologies
revealed
both
long-term
fidelity
limited
forms
CCE
non-human
Attention
now
turns
directly
investigating
scope,
underlying
cognition
versus
CCE,
with
broader
approach
factors
additional
transmission,
role
invention,
innovation
evolved
motivational
biases
species
studied.
Nature Human Behaviour,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
8(5), P. 891 - 902
Published: March 6, 2024
Abstract
Cumulative
cultural
evolution
has
been
claimed
to
be
a
uniquely
human
phenomenon
pivotal
the
biological
success
of
our
species.
One
plausible
condition
for
cumulative
emerge
is
individuals’
ability
use
social
learning
acquire
know-how
that
they
cannot
easily
innovate
by
themselves.
It
suggested
chimpanzees
may
capable
such
learning,
but
this
assertion
remains
largely
untested.
Here
we
show
skill
failed
independently
innovate.
By
teaching
how
solve
sequential
task
(one
chimpanzee
in
each
two
tested
groups,
n
=
66)
and
using
network-based
diffusion
analysis,
found
14
naive
learned
operate
puzzle
box
during
preceding
three
months
exposure
all
necessary
materials.
In
conjunction,
present
evidence
hypothesis
sufficient
new,
complex
after
initial
innovation.
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences,
Journal Year:
2021,
Volume and Issue:
377(1843)
Published: Dec. 13, 2021
Cumulative
cultural
evolution
(CCE)-defined
as
the
process
by
which
beneficial
modifications
are
culturally
transmitted
and
progressively
accumulated
over
time-has
long
been
argued
to
underlie
unparalleled
diversity
complexity
of
human
culture.
In
this
paper,
I
argue
that
not
just
any
kind
accumulation
will
give
rise
human-like
Rather,
suggest
CCE
depends
on
gradual
exploitation
natural
phenomena,
features
our
environment
that,
through
laws
physics,
chemistry
or
biology,
generate
reliable
effects
can
be
exploited
for
a
purpose.
comprises
two
distinct
processes:
optimizing
traits
exploit
given
set
phenomena
(Type
CCE)
expanding
we
II
CCE).
most
critical
CCE,
including
its
open-ended
dynamic,
stems
from
Type
CCE.
Throughout
contrast
processes
discuss
their
respective
socio-cognitive
requirements.
This
article
is
part
discussion
meeting
issue
'The
emergence
collective
knowledge
cumulative
culture
in
animals,
humans
machines'.
Science Advances,
Journal Year:
2022,
Volume and Issue:
8(9)
Published: March 2, 2022
Understanding
the
evolution
of
human
technology
is
key
to
solving
mystery
our
origins.
Current
theories
propose
that
evolved
through
accumulation
modifications
were
mostly
transmitted
between
individuals
by
blind
copying
and
selective
retention
advantageous
variations.
An
alternative
account
high-fidelity
transmission
in
context
cumulative
technological
culture
supported
technical
reasoning,
which
a
reconstruction
mechanism
allows
converge
optimal
solutions.
We
tested
these
two
competing
hypotheses
with
microsociety
experiment,
participants
had
optimize
physical
system
partial-
degraded-information
conditions.
Our
results
indicated
an
improvement
over
generations,
was
accompanied
increased
understanding
it.
The
solutions
produced
tended
progressively
generations.
These
findings
show
reasoning
can
bolster
convergent
transformations,
highlights
its
role
cultural
technology.
Physics of Life Reviews,
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
45, P. 6 - 24
Published: March 6, 2023
A
prerequisite
for
copying
innovative
behaviour
faithfully
is
the
capacity
of
observers'
brains,
regarded
as
'hierarchically
mechanistic
minds',
to
overcome
cognitive
'surprisal'
(see
2.),
by
maximising
evidence
their
internal
models,
through
active
inference.
Unlike
modern
humans,
chimpanzees
and
other
great
apes
show
considerable
limitations
in
ability,
or
'Zone
Bounded
Surprisal',
surprisal
induced
unorthodox
that
rarely,
therefore,
copied
precisely
accurately.
Most
can
copy
adequately
what
within
phenotypically
habitual
behavioural
repertoire,
which
technology
plays
scant
part.
Widespread
intra-
intergenerational
social
transmission
complex
technological
innovations
not
a
hall-mark
great-ape
taxa.
3
Ma,
precursors
genus
Homo
made
stone
artefacts,
stone-flaking
likely
was
before
2
Ma.
After
time,
early
erectus
has
left
traces
innovations,
though
faithful
these
were
rare
1
This
owed
cerebral
infrastructure
interconnected
neuronal
systems
more
limited
than
ours.
Brains
smaller
size
ours,
ceased
develop
when
attained
full
adult
maturity
mid-teen
years,
whereas
its
development
continues
until
our
mid-twenties
nowadays.
Pleistocene
underwent
remarkable
evolutionary
adaptation
neurobiological
propensities,
aspects
are
discussed
that,
it
proposed
here,
plausibly,
fundamental
copying,
underpinned
technologies,
cumulative
learning,
culture.
Here,
responses
an
innovation
important
ensuring
innovator's
production
it,
because,
themselves,
minimal
prerequisites
needed
encoding
assimilating
insufficient
practical
outcomes
accumulate
spread
intergenerationally.
Oxford University Press eBooks,
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
unknown
Published: Oct. 23, 2023
Abstract
Studies
that
directly
compare
the
behaviour
of
two
or
more
species
can
identify
important
similarities
and
differences
in
psychological
mechanisms
underpin
culture,
social
learning,
innovation.
This
chapter
focuses
on
phylogenetically
closely
related
human
children
non-human
primates
to
justify
a
comparative
approach
understanding
culture.
Methodological
approaches
are
outlined,
formative
research
is
summarized.
We
provide
an
overview
close
convergence
many
behaviours,
highlighting
potential
evolutionary
foundations
necessary
toolkit
underpinning
Alongside
this,
illustrates
equally
valuable
divergence
between
species,
demonstrating
cognition
further
illuminate
our
The
challenges
limitations
acknowledged
explored,
future
avenues
effective
proposed.
Our
propensity
to
materiality,
which
consists
in
using,
making,
creating,
and
passing
on
technologies,
has
enabled
us
shape
the
physical
world
according
our
ends.
To
explain
this
proclivity,
scientists
have
calibrated
their
lens
either
low-level
skills
such
as
motor
cognition
or
high-level
language
social
cognition.
Yet,
little
been
said
about
intermediate-level
cognitive
processes
that
are
directly
involved
mastering
is,
technical
We
aim
focus
intermediate
level
for
providing
new
insights
into
neurocognitive
bases
of
human
materiality.
Here
we
show
a
technical-reasoning
process
might
be
specifically
at
work
problem-solving
situations.
found
via
two
distinct
neuroimaging
studies
area
PF
(parietal
F)
within
left
parietal
lobe
is
central
reasoning
both
tool-use
non-tool-use
can
along
with
social-cognitive
resolve
day-to-day
interactions
combine
constraints.
results
demonstrate
existence
specific
module
brain
dedicated
supporting
pillar
allowing
accumulation
knowledge
over
generations.
Intensifying
research
could
nurture
comprehensive
framework
missing
fields
interested
how
early
modern
humans
interacting
through
technology,
interaction
shaped
history
culture.
Our
propensity
to
materiality,
which
consists
in
using,
making,
creating,
and
passing
on
technologies,
has
enabled
us
shape
the
physical
world
according
our
ends.
To
explain
this
proclivity,
scientists
have
calibrated
their
lens
either
low-level
skills
such
as
motor
cognition
or
high-level
language
social
cognition.
Yet,
little
been
said
about
intermediate-level
cognitive
processes
that
are
directly
involved
mastering
is,
technical
We
aim
focus
intermediate
level
for
providing
new
insights
into
neurocognitive
bases
of
human
materiality.
Here,
we
show
a
technical-reasoning
process
might
be
specifically
at
work
problem-solving
situations.
found
via
two
distinct
neuroimaging
studies
area
PF
(parietal
F)
within
left
parietal
lobe
is
central
reasoning
both
tool-use
non-tool-use
can
along
with
social-cognitive
resolve
day-to-day
interactions
combine
constraints.
results
demonstrate
existence
specific
module
brain
dedicated
supporting
pillar
allowing
accumulation
knowledge
over
generations.
Intensifying
research
could
nurture
comprehensive
framework
missing
fields
interested
how
early
modern
humans
interacting
through
technology,
interaction
shaped
history
culture.