COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy: Umbrella Review of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (Preprint) DOI Creative Commons

Tahani Al Rahbeni,

Prakasini Satapathy, Ramaiah Itumalla

et al.

Published: Nov. 21, 2023

BACKGROUND The unprecedented emergence of the COVID-19 pandemic necessitated development and global distribution vaccines, making understanding vaccine acceptance hesitancy crucial to overcoming barriers vaccination achieving widespread immunization. OBJECTIVE This umbrella review synthesizes findings from systematic reviews meta-analyses provide insights into perceptions on across diverse populations regions. METHODS We conducted a literature search major databases identify meta-analysis that reported hesitancy. AMSTAR-2 (A Measurement Tool Assess Systematic Reviews) criteria were used assess methodological quality included reviews. Meta-analysis was performed using STATA 17 with random effect model. data synthesis is presented in table format via narrative. RESULTS Our inclusion met by 78 published between 2021 2023. analysis revealed moderate rate 63% (95% CI 0.60%-0.67%) general population, significant heterogeneity (<i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 97.59%). Higher rates observed among health care workers individuals chronic diseases, at 64% 0.57%-0.71%) 69% 0.61%-0.76%), respectively. However, lower noted pregnant women, 48% 0.42%-0.53%), parents consenting for their children, 61.29% 0.56%-0.67%). pooled 32% 0.25%-0.39%) population. assessment 19 high-quality, 38 moderate-quality, 15 low-quality, 6 critically low-quality meta-analyses. CONCLUSIONS presence globally, emphasizing necessity population-specific, culturally sensitive interventions clear, credible information dissemination foster acceptance. disparities accentuate need continuous research understand evolving address unique concerns needs populations, thereby aiding formulation effective inclusive strategies. CLINICALTRIAL PROSPERO CRD42023468363; https://tinyurl.com/2p9kv9cr

Language: Английский

Does education influence COVID-19 vaccination? A global view DOI Creative Commons
Dan Lupu, Ramona Ţigănaşu

Heliyon, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 10(3), P. e24709 - e24709

Published: Jan. 19, 2024

After the recent hard times felt on a global scale, notably in health sector, steady efforts of scientists have been materialized maybe one most expected findings last decades, i.e. launching COVID-19 vaccines. Although it is not our goal to plead for vaccination, as decision this regard matter individual choice, we believe necessary and enlightening analyze how one's educational status interferes with vaccination. There are discrepancies between world states vis-à-vis their well-being feedback crises, from collection features that can segregate handling paper, spotlight education. We referring topic because, generally, researches converge rather linkage economic issues while education levels less tackled relation this. To notice weight each type (primary, secondary, tertiary) process, employ an assortment statistical methods, three clusters: 45 low-income countries (LICs), 72 middle-income (MICs) 53 high-income (HICs). The estimates suggest counts tertiary having greatest meaning accepting it. It also illustrated imprint vaccination varies across country groups scrutinized, HICs recording upper rates. heterogeneity vaccination-related behaviors should determine authorities approach subject differently. expand vaccines uptake, they be ongoing dialogue all population categories and, remarkably, those belonging vulnerable communities, originated mostly LICs. Education imperative would ought schedule any state, being assimilated into strategies policies.

Language: Английский

Citations

24
COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy: Umbrella Review of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis DOI Creative Commons

Tahani Al Rahbeni,

Prakasini Satapathy, Ramaiah Itumalla

et al.

JMIR Public Health and Surveillance, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 10, P. e54769 - e54769

Published: April 30, 2024

The unprecedented emergence of the COVID-19 pandemic necessitated development and global distribution vaccines, making understanding vaccine acceptance hesitancy crucial to overcoming barriers vaccination achieving widespread immunization.

Language: Английский

Citations

15
A Time to Get Vaccinated? The Role of Time Perspective, Consideration of Future Consequences, Conspiracy Beliefs, Religious Faith, Gender, and Race on Intention to Vaccinate for COVID-19 in the United States DOI Open Access
Lening A. Olivera-Figueroa, Alexander Unger, Julie Papastamatelou

et al.

International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Journal Year: 2023, Volume and Issue: 20(4), P. 3625 - 3625

Published: Feb. 17, 2023

The present study examined the predictability of Time Perspective (TP) tendencies (i.e., Past Positive, Negative, Present Hedonistic, Fatalistic, and Future), Balanced (BTP) profile, Consideration Future Consequences—Immediate (CFC-I) factor, Consequences—Future (CFC-F) conspiracy beliefs about COVID-19 being a hoax, religious faith, gender, race on vaccination intention as dependent variable. Participants were recruited in United States through online platforms Prolific Google Forms. final sample was n = 232 (n 99 male, 129 female, 2 other, Mage 31). Outcome measures included sociodemographic questions, Zimbardo Inventory—short version, Consequences (CFC) ultra-short scale, Conspiracy Beliefs questionnaire, Santa Clara Strength Religious Faith Questionnaire—brief version. Regression analyses revealed that reduced by gender identification woman, multiracial or from mixed origin, Deviation BTP belief faith. Conversely, to vaccinate against increased CFC-I, CFC-F. These findings could be beneficial for knowledge transfer behavioral interventions aimed promote COVID-19, health promotion campaigns, public field.

Language: Английский

Citations

4
Confidence interval for normal means in meta-analysis based on a pretest estimator DOI

Nanami Taketomi,

Yuan-Tsung Chang,

Yoshihiko Konno

et al.

Japanese Journal of Statistics and Data Science, Journal Year: 2023, Volume and Issue: 7(1), P. 537 - 568

Published: Nov. 27, 2023

Language: Английский

Citations

3
A pharmacist-led community-based survey study: Determining the impact of the Covid-19 pandemic on actionable factors associated with worse cancer outcomes and cancer health disparities DOI Creative Commons
Erika Titus-Lay, Jeffrey Nehira, Jennifer Courtney

et al.

Exploratory Research in Clinical and Social Pharmacy, Journal Year: 2023, Volume and Issue: 11, P. 100311 - 100311

Published: July 13, 2023

The goals of this cross-sectional community-based survey study were to assess the impact Covid-19 pandemic on actionable factors which are known contribute worse cancer outcomes, and determine whether race ethnicity-based differences exist.

Language: Английский

Citations

0
COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy: Umbrella Review of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (Preprint) DOI Creative Commons

Tahani Al Rahbeni,

Prakasini Satapathy, Ramaiah Itumalla

et al.

Published: Nov. 21, 2023

BACKGROUND The unprecedented emergence of the COVID-19 pandemic necessitated development and global distribution vaccines, making understanding vaccine acceptance hesitancy crucial to overcoming barriers vaccination achieving widespread immunization. OBJECTIVE This umbrella review synthesizes findings from systematic reviews meta-analyses provide insights into perceptions on across diverse populations regions. METHODS We conducted a literature search major databases identify meta-analysis that reported hesitancy. AMSTAR-2 (A Measurement Tool Assess Systematic Reviews) criteria were used assess methodological quality included reviews. Meta-analysis was performed using STATA 17 with random effect model. data synthesis is presented in table format via narrative. RESULTS Our inclusion met by 78 published between 2021 2023. analysis revealed moderate rate 63% (95% CI 0.60%-0.67%) general population, significant heterogeneity (<i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 97.59%). Higher rates observed among health care workers individuals chronic diseases, at 64% 0.57%-0.71%) 69% 0.61%-0.76%), respectively. However, lower noted pregnant women, 48% 0.42%-0.53%), parents consenting for their children, 61.29% 0.56%-0.67%). pooled 32% 0.25%-0.39%) population. assessment 19 high-quality, 38 moderate-quality, 15 low-quality, 6 critically low-quality meta-analyses. CONCLUSIONS presence globally, emphasizing necessity population-specific, culturally sensitive interventions clear, credible information dissemination foster acceptance. disparities accentuate need continuous research understand evolving address unique concerns needs populations, thereby aiding formulation effective inclusive strategies. CLINICALTRIAL PROSPERO CRD42023468363; https://tinyurl.com/2p9kv9cr

Language: Английский

Citations

0