Journal of Digital Technologies and Law, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 2(3), P. 711 - 728
Published: Nov. 10, 2024
Objective : to present the results of a systematic review research on impact neurotechnology legal concepts and regulatory frameworks, addressing ethical social issues related protection individual rights, privacy mental autonomy. Methods The literature was based methodology proposed by renowned British scholar, professor emerita computer science at Keele University Barbara Kitchenham, chosen for its flexibility effectiveness in obtaining publication. Thorough searches were carried out with search terms “neurotechnology”, “personal data”, “mental privacy”, “neuro-rights”, “neurotechnological interventions”, discrimination” both English Spanish sites, using engines like Google Scholar Redib as well databases including Scielo, Dialnet, Redalyc, Lilacs, Scopus, Medline, Pubmed. focus this is bibliometric data design non-experimental cross-sectional descriptive, content analysis PRISMA model. Results study emphasizes need establish clear principles protect rights promote responsible use neurotechnologies; number problems autonomy identified, such improper handling information, lack security guarantees, violation freedoms medical sphere. author shows adapt existing framework address arising from new neurotechnologies. It noted that broad will contribute human rights. Scientific novelty: an expanded understanding five neurorights within Universal Declaration Human Rights proposed; are viewed category aimed protecting integrity against misuse justifies adoption technocratic personal identity, free will, privacy, equal access bias. Practical significance: obtained relevant modern adapting normative acts solve emergence technologies, liability their violation. these key provision further development
Language: Английский