Estimation of hydrogen solubility in aqueous solutions using machine learning techniques for hydrogen storage in deep saline aquifers DOI Creative Commons
Mohammad Rasool Dehghani,

Hamed Nikravesh,

Maryam Aghel

et al.

Scientific Reports, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 14(1)

Published: Oct. 29, 2024

The porous underground structures have recently attracted researchers' attention for hydrogen gas storage due to their high capacity. One of the challenges in storing aqueous solutions is estimating its solubility water. In this study, after collecting experimental data from previous research and eliminating four outliers, nine machine learning methods were developed estimate To optimize parameters used model construction, a Bayesian optimization algorithm was employed. By examining error functions plots, LSBoost method with R² = 0.9997 RMSE 4.18E-03 identified as most accurate method. Additionally, artificial neural network, CatBoost, Extra trees, Gaussian process regression, bagged regression support vector machines, linear had values 0.9925, 0.9907, 0.9906, 0.9867, 0.9866, 0.9808, 0.9464, 0.7682 2.13E-02, 2.43E-02, 2.44E-02, 2.83E-02, 2.85E-02, 3.40E-02, 5.68E-02, 1.18E-01, respectively. Subsequently, residual plots generated, indicating performance across all ranges. maximum - 0.0252, only 4 points estimated an greater than ± 0.01. A kernel density estimation (KDE) plot errors showed no specific bias models except model. investigate impact temperature, pressure, salinity on outputs, Pearson correlation coefficients calculated, showing that 0.8188, 0.1008, 0.5506, respectively, pressure strongest direct relationship, while inverse relationship solubility. Considering results research, method, alongside approaches like state equations, can be applied real-world scenarios storage. findings study help better understanding solutions, aiding systems.

Language: Английский

Numerical simulation of large-scale seasonal hydrogen storage in an anticline aquifer: A case study capturing hydrogen interactions and cushion gas injection DOI
Maojie Chai, Zhangxin Chen, Hossein Nourozieh

et al.

Applied Energy, Journal Year: 2023, Volume and Issue: 334, P. 120655 - 120655

Published: Jan. 20, 2023

Language: Английский

Citations

76

Interfacial Tensions, Solubilities, and Transport Properties of the H2/H2O/NaCl System: A Molecular Simulation Study DOI Creative Commons

W. A. van Rooijen,

Parsa Habibi, Ke Xu

et al.

Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data, Journal Year: 2023, Volume and Issue: 69(2), P. 307 - 319

Published: Jan. 11, 2023

Data for several key thermodynamic and transport properties needed technologies using hydrogen (H

Language: Английский

Citations

50

Machine-learning models to predict hydrogen uptake of porous carbon materials from influential variables DOI
Shadfar Davoodi, Hung Vo Thanh, David A. Wood

et al.

Separation and Purification Technology, Journal Year: 2023, Volume and Issue: 316, P. 123807 - 123807

Published: April 10, 2023

Language: Английский

Citations

47

Underground hydrogen storage: A critical assessment of fluid-fluid and fluid-rock interactions DOI
Afeez Gbadamosi, Nasiru Salahu Muhammed, Shirish Patil

et al.

Journal of Energy Storage, Journal Year: 2023, Volume and Issue: 72, P. 108473 - 108473

Published: July 26, 2023

Language: Английский

Citations

47

A review of underground hydrogen storage systems: Current status, modeling approaches, challenges, and future prospective DOI
Shree Om Bade,

Kemi Taiwo,

Uchenna Frank Ndulue

et al.

International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 80, P. 449 - 474

Published: July 17, 2024

Language: Английский

Citations

47

The effect of gas solubility on the selection of cushion gas for underground hydrogen storage in aquifers DOI

Ismaeil Izadi Amiri,

Davood Zivar, Shahab Ayatollahi

et al.

Journal of Energy Storage, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 80, P. 110264 - 110264

Published: Jan. 8, 2024

Language: Английский

Citations

29

Exploring hydrogen geologic storage in China for future energy: Opportunities and challenges DOI

Zhengyang Du,

Zhenxue Dai, Zhijie Yang

et al.

Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 196, P. 114366 - 114366

Published: March 15, 2024

Language: Английский

Citations

22

A critical review of physics-informed machine learning applications in subsurface energy systems DOI
Abdeldjalil Latrach, Mohamed Lamine Malki, Misael M. Morales

et al.

Geoenergy Science and Engineering, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 239, P. 212938 - 212938

Published: May 22, 2024

Language: Английский

Citations

19

Machine learning assisted predictions for hydrogen storage in metal-organic frameworks DOI
Khashayar Salehi, Mohammad Rahmani,

Saeid Atashrouz

et al.

International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, Journal Year: 2023, Volume and Issue: 48(85), P. 33260 - 33275

Published: May 24, 2023

Language: Английский

Citations

39

Modelling underground hydrogen storage: A state-of-the-art review of fundamental approaches and findings DOI Creative Commons
Motaz Saeed, Prashant Jadhawar

Gas Science and Engineering, Journal Year: 2023, Volume and Issue: 121, P. 205196 - 205196

Published: Dec. 16, 2023

This review presents a State-of-Art of geochemical, geomechanical, and hydrodynamic modelling studies in the Underground Hydrogen Storage (UHS) domain. Geochemical assessed reactivity hydrogen respective fluctuations losses using kinetic reaction rates, rock mineralogy, brine salinity, integration redox reactions. Existing geomechanics offer an array coupled hydro-mechanical models, suggesting decline failure during withdrawal phase aquifers compared to injection phase. Hydrodynamic evaluations indicate critical importance relative permeability hysteresis determining UHS performance. Solubility diffusion gas appear have minimal impact on UHS. Injection production cushion deployment, reservoir heterogeneity however significantly affect performance, stressing need for thorough experimental studies. However, most current efforts focuses assessing aspects which are crucial understanding viability safety In contrast, lesser-explored geochemical geomechanical considerations point potential research gaps. Variety software tools such as CMG, Eclipse, COMSOL, PHREEQC evaluated those underlying effects, along with few recent application data-driven based Machine Learning (ML) techniques enhanced accuracy. identified several unresolved challenges modelling: pronounced lack expansive datasets, leading gap between model predictions their practical reliability; robust methodologies capable capturing natural subsurface while upscaling from precise laboratory data field-scale conditions; demanding intensive computational resources novel strategies enhance simulation efficiency; addressing geological uncertainties environments, that oil simulations could be adapted comprehensive offers synthesis prevailing approaches, challenges, gaps domain UHS, thus providing valuable reference document further efforts, facilitating informed advancements this towards realization sustainable energy solutions.

Language: Английский

Citations

38