Hierarchical Energy Management and Energy Saving Potential Analysis for Fuel Cell Hybrid Electric Tractors
Shenghui Lei,
No information about this author
Yanying Li,
No information about this author
Mengnan Liu
No information about this author
et al.
Energies,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
18(2), P. 247 - 247
Published: Jan. 8, 2025
To
address
the
challenges
faced
by
fuel
cell
hybrid
electric
tractors
(FCHETs)
equipped
with
a
battery
and
supercapacitor,
including
complex
coordination
of
multiple
energy
sources,
low
power
allocation
efficiency,
unclear
optimal
consumption,
this
paper
proposes
two
management
strategies
(EMSs):
one
based
on
hierarchical
instantaneous
optimization
(HIO)
other
multi-dimensional
dynamic
programming
final
state
constraints
(MDDP-FSC).
The
proposed
HIO-based
EMS
utilizes
low-pass
filter
fuzzy
logic
correction
in
its
upper-level
strategy
to
manage
high-frequency
using
supercapacitor.
lower-level
optimizes
efficiency
allocating
low-frequency
stable
principle
minimizing
equivalent
consumption.
Validation
hardware-in-the-loop
(HIL)
simulation
platform
comparative
analysis
demonstrate
that
effectively
improves
transient
operating
conditions
cell,
extending
their
lifespan
enhancing
system
efficiency.
Furthermore,
achieves
95.20%
level
hydrogen
consumption
compared
MDDP-FSC-based
EMS,
validating
superiority.
avoids
extensive
debugging
efforts
required
achieve
equilibrium,
while
providing
valuable
insights
into
global
potential
multi-energy
source
FCHETs.
Language: Английский
Advanced Temperature Design for Dynamic Performance Enhancement of PEMFCs Under High Current Density (HCD)
Fengyang Cai,
No information about this author
Shanshan Cai,
No information about this author
Zhengkai Tu
No information about this author
et al.
Advanced Science,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
unknown
Published: April 25, 2025
Abstract
The
dynamic
performance
of
proton
exchange
membrane
fuel
cells
(PEMFCs)
under
high
current
density
(HCD)
rapid
loading
is
crucial
for
commercialization.
This
study
introduces
an
advanced
temperature
difference
(TD)
design
featuring
in‐plane
gradient.
By
reconstructing
cooling
channels,
optimal
distribution
across
the
upstream,
midstream,
and
downstream
regions
achieves
balanced
water‐gas‐heat
conditions,
enhancing
response
PEMFCs
HCD
loading.
Various
TD
designs
are
investigated
a
broad
humidity
range,
innovatively
focusing
on
key
moments
involving
load
initiation,
transient
voltage
minimum
(TVM),
steady‐state
(SSV).
Comprehensive
evaluations
encompassing
energy
consumption
assess
enhancements,
while
electrochemical
impedance
spectroscopy
(EIS)
local
monitoring
further
elucidate
underlying
mechanisms.
Results
show
positive
(PTD)
enhances
hydration
upstream
mitigates
flooding
low‐humidity
conditions.
Conversely,
negative
(NTD)
tends
to
dehydration
downstream.
At
RH
=
35%,
PTD
increases
TVM
by
18.2%,
decreases
undershoot
(VU)
12.5%,
raises
SSV
5.67%,
electricity
output
7%.
As
increases,
effect
gradually
weakens,
though
it
still
benefits
uniformity.
Language: Английский