Journal Of Big Data,
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
10(1)
Published: March 4, 2023
Abstract
Machine
learning
models
have
been
increasingly
considered
to
model
head
and
neck
cancer
outcomes
for
improved
screening,
diagnosis,
treatment,
prognostication
of
the
disease.
As
concept
data-centric
artificial
intelligence
is
still
incipient
in
healthcare
systems,
little
known
about
data
quality
proposed
clinical
utility.
This
important
as
it
supports
generalizability
standardization.
Therefore,
this
study
overviews
structured
unstructured
used
machine
construction
cancer.
Relevant
studies
reporting
on
use
based
custom
datasets
between
January
2016
June
2022
were
sourced
from
PubMed,
EMBASE,
Scopus,
Web
Science
electronic
databases.
Prediction
Risk
Bias
Assessment
(PROBAST)
tool
was
assess
individual
before
comprehensive
parameters
assessed
according
type
dataset
construction.
A
total
159
included
review;
106
utilized
while
53
datasets.
Data
assessments
deliberately
performed
14.2%
11.3%
Class
imbalance
fairness
most
common
limitations
both
types
outlier
detection
lack
representative
outcome
classes
respectively.
Furthermore,
review
found
that
class
reduced
discriminatory
performance
higher
image
resolution
good
overlap
resulted
better
using
during
internal
validation.
Overall,
infrequently
ML
irrespective
or
To
improve
generalizability,
discussed
should
be
introduced
achieve
intelligent
systems
management.
npj Digital Medicine,
Journal Year:
2022,
Volume and Issue:
5(1)
Published: Oct. 19, 2022
Abstract
Transparency
in
Machine
Learning
(ML),
often
also
referred
to
as
interpretability
or
explainability,
attempts
reveal
the
working
mechanisms
of
complex
models.
From
a
human-centered
design
perspective,
transparency
is
not
property
ML
model
but
an
affordance,
i.e.,
relationship
between
algorithm
and
users.
Thus,
prototyping
user
evaluations
are
critical
attaining
solutions
that
afford
transparency.
Following
principles
highly
specialized
high
stakes
domains,
such
medical
image
analysis,
challenging
due
limited
access
end
users
knowledge
imbalance
those
designers.
To
investigate
state
transparent
we
conducted
systematic
review
literature
from
2012
2021
PubMed,
EMBASE,
Compendex
databases.
We
identified
2508
records
68
articles
met
inclusion
criteria.
Current
techniques
dominated
by
computational
feasibility
barely
consider
users,
e.g.
clinical
stakeholders.
Despite
different
roles
developers
no
study
reported
formative
research
inform
development
Only
few
studies
validated
claims
through
empirical
evaluations.
These
shortcomings
put
contemporary
on
at
risk
being
incomprehensible
thus,
clinically
irrelevant.
alleviate
these
forthcoming
research,
introduce
INTRPRT
guideline
,
directive
for
systems
analysis.
The
suggests
principles,
recommending
first
step
understand
needs
domain
requirements.
guidelines
increases
likelihood
algorithms
enable
stakeholders
capitalize
benefits
ML.
BMJ Health & Care Informatics,
Journal Year:
2021,
Volume and Issue:
28(1), P. e100444 - e100444
Published: Oct. 1, 2021
To
date,
many
artificial
intelligence
(AI)
systems
have
been
developed
in
healthcare,
but
adoption
has
limited.
This
may
be
due
to
inappropriate
or
incomplete
evaluation
and
a
lack
of
internationally
recognised
AI
standards
on
evaluation.
confidence
the
generalisability
healthcare
enable
their
integration
into
workflows,
there
is
need
for
practical
yet
comprehensive
instrument
assess
translational
aspects
available
systems.
Currently
frameworks
focus
reporting
regulatory
little
guidance
regarding
assessment
like
functional,
utility
ethical
components.To
address
this
gap
create
framework
that
assesses
real-world
systems,
an
international
team
translationally
focused
termed
'Translational
Evaluation
Healthcare
(TEHAI)'.
A
critical
review
literature
assessed
existing
gaps.
Next,
using
health
technology
principles,
components
were
identified
consideration.
These
independently
reviewed
consensus
inclusion
final
by
panel
eight
expert.TEHAI
includes
three
main
components:
capability,
adoption.
The
emphasis
features
model
development
deployment
distinguishes
TEHAI
from
other
instruments.
In
specific,
can
applied
at
any
stage
system.One
major
limitation
narrow
focus.
TEHAI,
because
its
strong
foundation
translation
research
models
safety,
value
generalisability,
not
only
theoretical
basis
also
application
assessing
systems.The
theoretic
approach
used
develop
should
see
it
having
just
clinical
settings,
more
broadly
guide
working
Journal of Medical Internet Research,
Journal Year:
2022,
Volume and Issue:
24(8), P. e36823 - e36823
Published: July 14, 2022
Artificial
intelligence
(AI)
is
rapidly
expanding
in
medicine
despite
a
lack
of
consensus
on
its
application
and
evaluation.We
sought
to
identify
current
frameworks
guiding
the
evaluation
AI
for
predictive
analytics
describe
content
these
frameworks.
We
also
assessed
what
stages
along
translational
spectrum
(ie,
development,
reporting,
evaluation,
implementation,
surveillance)
each
framework
has
been
discussed.We
performed
literature
review
regarding
oversight
medicine.
The
search
included
key
topics
such
as
"artificial
intelligence,"
"machine
learning,"
"guidance
topic,"
"translational
science,"
spanned
time
period
2014-2022.
Documents
were
if
they
provided
generalizable
guidance
use
or
Included
are
summarized
descriptively
subjected
analysis.
A
novel
matrix
was
developed
applied
appraise
frameworks'
coverage
areas
across
stages.Fourteen
featured
review,
including
six
that
provide
descriptive
eight
reporting
checklists
medical
applications
AI.
Content
analysis
revealed
five
considerations
related
frameworks:
transparency,
reproducibility,
ethics,
effectiveness,
engagement.
All
include
discussions
while
only
half
discuss
most
likely
report
stage
development
least
surveillance.Existing
notably
offer
less
input
role
engagement
surveillance.
Identifying
optimizing
strategies
essential
ensure
can
meaningfully
benefit
patients
other
end
users.
Radiology,
Journal Year:
2022,
Volume and Issue:
306(1), P. 20 - 31
Published: Nov. 8, 2022
Adequate
clinical
evaluation
of
artificial
intelligence
(AI)
algorithms
before
adoption
in
practice
is
critical.
Clinical
aims
to
confirm
acceptable
AI
performance
through
adequate
external
testing
and
the
benefits
AI-assisted
care
compared
with
conventional
appropriately
designed
conducted
studies,
for
which
prospective
studies
are
desirable.
This
article
explains
some
fundamental
methodological
points
that
should
be
considered
when
designing
appraising
medical
diagnosis.
The
specific
topics
addressed
include
following:
(a)
importance
strategies
conducting
effectively,
(b)
various
metrics
graphical
methods
evaluating
as
well
essential
note
using
interpreting
them,
(c)
paired
study
designs
primarily
comparative
diagnoses,
(d)
parallel
effect
intervention
an
emphasis
on
randomized
trials,
(e)
up-to-date
guidelines
reporting
AI,
registered
EQUATOR
Network
library.
Sound
knowledge
these
will
aid
design,
execution,
reporting,
appraisal
AI.
International Journal of Medical Informatics,
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
173, P. 105026 - 105026
Published: Feb. 28, 2023
Wearable
sensors
have
shown
promise
as
a
non-intrusive
method
for
collecting
biomarkers
that
may
correlate
with
levels
of
elevated
stress.
Stressors
cause
variety
biological
responses,
and
these
physiological
reactions
can
be
measured
using
including
Heart
Rate
Variability
(HRV),
Electrodermal
Activity
(EDA)
(HR)
represent
the
stress
response
from
Hypothalamic-Pituitary-Adrenal
(HPA)
axis,
Autonomic
Nervous
System
(ANS),
immune
system.
While
Cortisol
magnitude
remains
gold
standard
indicator
assessment
[1],
recent
advances
in
wearable
technologies
resulted
availability
number
consumer
devices
capable
recording
HRV,
EDA
HR
sensor
biomarkers,
amongst
other
signals.
At
same
time,
researchers
been
applying
machine
learning
techniques
to
recorded
order
build
models
able
predict
stress.The
aim
this
review
is
provide
an
overview
utilized
prior
research
specific
focus
on
model
generalization
when
public
datasets
training
data.
We
also
shed
light
challenges
opportunities
learning-enabled
monitoring
detection
face.This
study
reviewed
published
works
contributing
and/or
designed
detecting
their
associated
methods.
The
electronic
databases
Google
Scholar,
Crossref,
DOAJ
PubMed
were
searched
relevant
articles
total
33
identified
included
final
analysis.
synthesized
into
three
categories
publicly
available
datasets,
applied
those,
future
directions.
For
studies
reviewed,
we
analysis
approach
results
validation
generalization.
quality
was
conducted
accordance
IJMEDI
checklist
[2].A
are
labeled
detection.
These
most
commonly
produced
biomarker
data
Empatica
E4
device,
well-studied,
medical-grade
wrist-worn
provides
notable
Most
contain
less
than
twenty-four
hours
data,
varied
experimental
conditions
labeling
methodologies
potentially
limit
ability
generalize
unseen
In
addition,
discuss
previous
show
shortcomings
areas
such
protocols,
lack
statistical
power,
validity
ability.Health
tracking
growing
popularity,
while
existing
still
requires
further
study,
area
will
continue
improvements
newer
more
substantial
become
available.
International Journal of Medical Informatics,
Journal Year:
2021,
Volume and Issue:
157, P. 104641 - 104641
Published: Nov. 10, 2021
Acute
pancreatitis
(AP)
is
a
common
clinical
pancreatic
disease.
Patients
with
different
severity
levels
have
outcomes.
With
the
advantages
of
algorithms,
machine
learning
(ML)
has
gradually
emerged
in
field
disease
prediction,
assisting
doctors
decision-making.A
systematic
review
was
conducted
using
PubMed,
Web
Science,
Scopus,
and
Embase
databases,
following
Preferred
Reporting
Items
for
Systematic
Reviews
Meta-Analyses
guidelines.
Publication
time
limited
from
inception
to
29
May
2021.
Studies
that
used
ML
establish
predictive
tools
AP
were
eligible
inclusion.
Quality
assessment
included
studies
accordance
IJMEDI
checklist.In
this
review,
24
2,913
articles,
total
8,327
patients
47
models,
included.
The
could
be
divided
into
five
categories:
10
(42%)
reported
prediction;
(42%),
complication
3
(13%),
mortality
2
(8%),
recurrence
surgery
timing
prediction.
showed
great
accuracy
several
prediction
tasks.
However,
most
retrospective
nature,
at
single
centre,
based
on
database
data,
lacked
external
validation.
According
checklist
our
scoring
criteria,
two
considered
high
quality.
Most
had
an
obvious
bias
quality
data
preparation,
validation,
deployment
dimensions.In
tasks
AP,
shown
potential
decision-making.
existing
still
some
deficiencies
process
model
construction.
Future
need
optimize
further
evaluate
comparability
systems
performance,
so
as
consequently
develop
high-quality
ML-based
models
can
practice.
Journal of Internal Medicine,
Journal Year:
2022,
Volume and Issue:
292(2), P. 278 - 295
Published: April 15, 2022
The
deployment
of
machine
learning
for
tasks
relevant
to
complementing
standard
care
and
advancing
tools
precision
health
has
gained
much
attention
in
the
clinical
community,
thus
meriting
further
investigations
into
its
broader
use.
In
an
introduction
predictive
modelling
using
learning,
we
conducted
a
review
recent
literature
that
explains
taxonomies,
terminology
central
concepts
broad
readership.
Articles
aimed
at
readers
with
little
or
no
prior
experience
commonly
used
methods
typical
workflows
were
summarised
key
references
are
highlighted.
Continual
interdisciplinary
developments
data
science,
biostatistics
epidemiology
also
motivated
us
discuss
emerging
topics
data-driven
(hypothesis-less)
analytics
learning.
Through
two
methodological
deep
dives
examples
from
psychiatry
outcome
prediction
after
lymphoma,
highlight
how
use
of,
example,
natural
language
processing
can
outperform
established
risk
scores
aid
dynamic
adaptive
strategies.
Such
realistic
detailed
allow
critical
analysis
importance
new
technological
advances
artificial
intelligence
decision-making.
New
decision
support
systems
assist
prevention
by
leveraging
medicine.