British Journal of Radiology,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
unknown
Published: Dec. 20, 2024
To
audit
prospectively
the
accuracy,
time
saving
and
utility
of
a
commercial
artificial
intelligence
auto-contouring
tool
(AIAC).
assess
reallocation
released
by
AIAC.
Frontiers in Oncology,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
14
Published: Oct. 22, 2024
Background
Postoperative
radiotherapy
(PORT)
is
an
important
treatment
for
lung
cancer
patients
with
poor
prognostic
features,
but
accurate
delineation
of
the
clinical
target
volume
(CTV)
and
organs
at
risk
(OARs)
challenging
time-consuming.
Recently,
deep
learning-based
artificial
intelligent
(AI)
algorithms
have
shown
promise
in
automating
this
process.
Objective
To
evaluate
utility
a
auto-segmentation
model
AI-assisted
delineating
CTV
OARs
undergoing
PORT,
to
compare
its
accuracy
efficiency
manual
by
radiation
oncology
residents
from
different
levels
medical
institutions.
Methods
We
previously
developed
AI
664
validated
contouring
performance
149
patients.
In
multi-center,
validation
trial,
we
prospectively
involved
55
compared
3
methods:
(i)
unmodified
auto-segmentation,
(ii)
fully
junior
centers,
(iii)
modifications
based
on
segmentation
(AI-assisted
delineation).
The
ground
truth
was
delineated
senior
oncologists.
Contouring
evaluated
Dice
similarity
coefficient
(DSC),
Hausdorff
distance
(HD),
mean
agreement
(MDA).
Inter-observer
consistency
assessed
variation
(CV).
Results
achieved
significantly
higher
auto-contouring
oncologists,
median
HD,
MDA,
DCS
values
20.03
vs.
21.55
mm,
2.57
3.06
0.745
0.703
(all
P<0.05)
CTV,
respectively.
results
contours
were
similar.
CV
reduced
approximately
50%.
addition
better
accuracy,
decreased
consuming
time
improved
efficiency.
Conclusion
PORT
improves
real-world
setting,
pure
or
approach
has
promising
potential
enhance
quality
planning
further
improve
outcomes
cancer.
Deleted Journal,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
1(1)
Published: Jan. 1, 2024
Abstract
Radiation
therapy
is
a
localized
cancer
treatment
that
relies
on
precise
delineation
of
the
target
to
be
treated
and
healthy
tissues
guarantee
optimal
effect.
This
step,
known
as
contouring
or
segmentation,
involves
identifying
both
volumes
organs
at
risk
imaging
modalities
like
CT,
PET,
MRI
guide
radiation
delivery.
Manual
however,
time-consuming
highly
subjective,
despite
presence
guidelines.
In
recent
years,
automated
segmentation
methods,
particularly
deep
learning
models,
have
shown
promise
in
addressing
this
task.
However,
challenges
persist
their
clinical
use,
including
need
for
robust
quality
assurance
(QA)
processes
risks
associated
with
use
models.
review
examines
considerations
adoption
auto-segmentation
radiotherapy,
focused
volume.
We
discuss
potential
(eg,
over-
under-segmentation,
automation
bias,
appropriate
trust),
mitigation
strategies
human
oversight,
uncertainty
quantification,
education
professionals),
we
highlight
importance
expanding
QA
include
geometric,
dose-volume,
outcome-based
performance
monitoring.
While
offers
significant
benefits,
careful
attention
rigorous
measures
are
essential
its
successful
integration
practice.
medRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory),
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
unknown
Published: May 13, 2024
Abstract
Background/purpose
The
use
of
artificial
intelligence
(AI)
in
radiotherapy
(RT)
is
expanding
rapidly.
However,
there
exists
a
notable
lack
clinician
trust
AI
models,
underscoring
the
need
for
effective
uncertainty
quantification
(UQ)
methods.
purpose
this
study
was
to
scope
existing
literature
related
UQ
RT,
identify
areas
improvement,
and
determine
future
directions.
Methods
We
followed
PRISMA-ScR
scoping
review
reporting
guidelines.
utilized
population
(human
cancer
patients),
concept
(utilization
UQ),
context
(radiotherapy
applications)
framework
structure
our
search
screening
process.
conducted
systematic
spanning
seven
databases,
supplemented
by
manual
curation,
up
January
2024.
Our
yielded
total
8980
articles
initial
review.
Manuscript
data
extraction
performed
Covidence.
Data
categories
included
general
characteristics,
RT
characteristics.
Results
identified
56
published
from
2015-2024.
10
domains
applications
were
represented;
most
studies
evaluated
auto-contouring
(50%),
image-synthesis
(13%),
multiple
simultaneously
(11%).
12
disease
sites
represented,
with
head
neck
being
common
site
independent
application
space
(32%).
Imaging
used
91%
studies,
while
only
13%
incorporated
dose
information.
Most
focused
on
failure
detection
as
main
(60%),
Monte
Carlo
dropout
commonly
implemented
method
(32%)
ensembling
(16%).
55%
did
not
share
code
or
datasets.
Conclusion
revealed
diversity
beyond
auto-contouring.
Moreover,
clear
additional
methods,
such
conformal
prediction.
results
may
incentivize
development
guidelines
implementation
RT.
Multimodal Technologies and Interaction,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
8(12), P. 114 - 114
Published: Dec. 20, 2024
As
yet,
no
systematic
review
on
commercial
deep
learning-based
auto-segmentation
(DLAS)
software
for
breast
cancer
radiation
therapy
(RT)
planning
has
been
published,
although
NRG
Oncology
highlighted
the
necessity
such.
The
purpose
of
this
is
to
investigate
performances
DLAS
packages
RT
and
methods
their
performance
evaluation.
A
literature
search
was
conducted
with
use
electronic
databases.
Fifteen
papers
met
selection
criteria
were
included.
included
studies
evaluated
eight
(Limbus
Contour,
Manteia
AccuLearning,
Mirada
DLCExpert,
MVision.ai
Contour+,
Radformation
AutoContour,
RaySearch
RayStation,
Siemens
syngo.via
Image
Suite/AI-Rad
Companion
Organs
RT,
Therapanacea
Annotate).
Their
findings
show
that
could
contour
ten
organs
at
risk
(body,
contralateral
breast,
esophagus-overlapping
area,
heart,
ipsilateral
humeral
head,
left
right
lungs,
liver,
sternum
trachea)
three
clinical
target
volumes
(CTVp_breast,
CTVp_chestwall,
CTVn_L1)
up
clinically
acceptable
standard.
This
can
contribute
45.4%–93.7%
contouring
time
reduction
per
patient.
Although
NRO
suggested
every
center
should
conduct
its
own
evaluation
before
implementation,
such
testing
appears
particularly
crucial
Contour+
as
a
result
methodological
weaknesses
corresponding
studies,
small
datasets
collected
retrospectively
from
single
centers
British Journal of Radiology,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
unknown
Published: Dec. 20, 2024
To
audit
prospectively
the
accuracy,
time
saving
and
utility
of
a
commercial
artificial
intelligence
auto-contouring
tool
(AIAC).
assess
reallocation
released
by
AIAC.