Neural similarity and interaction success in autistic and non-autistic adolescents DOI Creative Commons
Kathryn A. McNaughton, Sarah L. Dziura, Edward P. Lemay

et al.

Scientific Reports, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: 15(1)

Published: March 7, 2025

High-quality social interactions promote well-being for typically developing and autistic youth. One factor that may contribute to the quality of is neural similarity, a metric which capture shared perspectives experiences world. The current research investigates relations between similarity peers day-to-day interaction success as measured through ecological momentary assessment in sample non-autistic youth aged 11-14 years old. Neural was operationalized between-participant correlation participants' response naturalistic video stimuli areas brain implicated mental state understanding reward processing. did not have main effect on success. However, across full sample, significantly interacted with reported closeness, such there were more positive closer interactions. also marginally partner (i.e., featuring versus others) predict success, suggesting peer In addition, better than These findings suggest one's processing mentalizing regions important They highlight challenge pose propose novel links brain's processes.

Language: Английский

Neural similarity and interaction success in autistic and non-autistic adolescents DOI Creative Commons
Kathryn A. McNaughton, Sarah L. Dziura, Edward P. Lemay

et al.

Scientific Reports, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: 15(1)

Published: March 7, 2025

High-quality social interactions promote well-being for typically developing and autistic youth. One factor that may contribute to the quality of is neural similarity, a metric which capture shared perspectives experiences world. The current research investigates relations between similarity peers day-to-day interaction success as measured through ecological momentary assessment in sample non-autistic youth aged 11-14 years old. Neural was operationalized between-participant correlation participants' response naturalistic video stimuli areas brain implicated mental state understanding reward processing. did not have main effect on success. However, across full sample, significantly interacted with reported closeness, such there were more positive closer interactions. also marginally partner (i.e., featuring versus others) predict success, suggesting peer In addition, better than These findings suggest one's processing mentalizing regions important They highlight challenge pose propose novel links brain's processes.

Language: Английский

Citations

0