Sustainability,
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
15(4), P. 3260 - 3260
Published: Feb. 10, 2023
This
article
constructed
two
spatial
indices
to
better
understand
the
interactions
between
social
sustainability
(an
important
but
poorly
defined
concept)
and
exposure
climatic
environmental
risks.
The
indices,
Choropleth
maps
used
represent
them,
can
be
combined
operationalized
across
different
country
contexts
yield
insights
into
how
climate
change
vulnerabilities
intersect
jointly
addressed.
were
here
applied
Vietnam,
a
particularly
exposed
change.
While
Vietnam
is
well-known
for
its
vulnerability
changing
temperatures
rising
sea
levels,
there
was
huge
variation
within
regions
these
analysis
also
found
enormous
risks
from
precipitation,
drought,
deforestation,
air
pollution.
Social
inclusion
generally
outperformed
resilience
cohesion,
as
well
empowerment
in
Vietnam.
Our
findings
robust
choices
of
indicators,
weights,
aggregation
specifications.
Journal of risk and financial management,
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
16(3), P. 151 - 151
Published: Feb. 24, 2023
This
study
explores
the
role
played
by
governance
in
developing
disaster
resiliency
and
its
impact
on
economic
sustainability
Greece.
Descriptive
research
was
undertaken,
data
were
collected
from
180
local
leaders
Western
Macedonia,
Greece,
to
gain
a
deeper
understanding
of
sustainability.
The
confirmed
hypothesis
that
focus
positively
affects
ability
develop
is
mostly
through
leadership,
engaging
civil
society,
international
cooperation.
These
roles
are
also
influenced
different
political,
economic,
cultural,
social
aspects,
which
all
have
an
risk
systems
cut
across
levels
resource
assurance,
technical
support,
management.
Governance
may
significant
overall
design
rules
systems,
including
legislation,
decision-making
procedures,
policy-implementation
mechanisms,
via
political
leadership.
In
terms
economics,
primary
responsibility
support
risk-reduction
systems.
must
encourage
awareness
national
basis
intensive
research,
technological
development,
disaster-reduction
education,
emergency
response
skills
practice.
Sustainability,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
16(7), P. 2620 - 2620
Published: March 22, 2024
This
paper
presents
the
results
of
quantitative
research
examining
impacts
demographic
and
socioeconomic
factors
on
sustainable
development
community
disaster
resilience.
The
survey
was
carried
out
utilizing
a
questionnaire
distributed
to,
subsequently
collected
online
from,
321
participants
during
January
2024.
study
employed
an
adapted
version
‘5S’
social
resilience
framework
(62
indicators),
encompassing
five
sub-dimensions—social
structure,
capital,
mechanisms,
equity
diversity,
belief.
To
explore
relationship
between
predictors
in
Serbia,
various
statistical
methods,
such
as
t-tests,
one-way
ANOVA,
Pearson’s
correlation,
multivariate
linear
regression,
were
used.
regressions
across
subscales
indicate
that
age
emerged
most
significant
predictor
for
structure
subscale.
At
same
time,
education
stood
primary
capital
Additionally,
employment
status
proved
to
be
influential
both
mechanisms
equity-diversity
subscales,
with
property
ownership
being
key
beliefs
findings
can
used
create
strategies
interventions
aimed
at
enhancing
communities
Serbia
by
addressing
intricate
interplay
characteristics,
socio-economic
factors,
their
ability
withstand,
adapt
recover
from
different
disasters.
BMC Public Health,
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
23(1)
Published: Dec. 14, 2023
Abstract
Background
Resilience
is
vital
for
facing
natural
disasters
and
public
health
challenges.
Despite
the
significance
of
resilience-building
activities,
there
a
scarcity
locally-tailored
planning
response
strategies,
leaving
communities
incapable
addressing
unique
challenges
posed
by
crises.
This
study
aims
to
explore
how
“One
Community
at
Time”
approach
enhances
community
resilience
in
hazards
Methods
A
systematic
review
was
conducted
over
journal
articles
published
from
January
2001
April
2023
through
PRISMA
approach.
Multiple
databases
such
as
Web
Science
Scopus
were
thoroughly
searched.
We
used
independent
screening
two
researchers
painstaking
data
extraction
using
standardized
forms.
adopted
assure
reliability,
validity,
precision
our
selection
analysis.
The
included
studies’
quality
evaluated
Mixed
Appraisal
Tool.
Results
In
evaluation,
35
studies
deemed
eligible
inclusion
underwent
in-depth
examination.
Several
major
components
have
been
identified,
including
social
capital
networks,
local
knowledge
learning,
effective
governance
leadership,
preparedness
capacity,
adaptive
infrastructure
resources.
framework
highlights
individualized
approaches
initiatives,
recognizing
that
each
has
specific
strengths,
needs,
Conclusion
Relevant
stakeholders
can
adapt
suitable
resilient
strategies
help
prepare
recover
By
adopting
localized
strategy,
collaborate
develop
culture
readiness
resilience,
ultimately
leading
more
sustainable
communities.
advises
community-based
groups,
government,
other
on
prioritizing
partnerships,
planning,
participation,
leadership
essential
creating
maintaining
resilience.
offers
practical
guidance
organizations,
prioritize
sustaining
This
paper
presents
the
results
of
quantitative
research
examining
impacts
demographic
and
socioeconomic
factors
on
community
resilience
to
disasters.
The
survey
was
carried
out
utilising
a
questionnaire
distributed
subsequently
collected
online
from
321
participants
during
January
2024.
study
employed
an
adapted
version
'5S'
social
framework,
encompassing
five
sub-dimensions
–
structure
(10
variables),
capital
(9
mechanisms
(17
equity
diversity
(13
belief
variables).
customized
framework
includes
62
indicators,
providing
thorough
assessment
(social)
disaster
in
context.
To
explore
relationship
between
predictors
Serbia,
their
attitudes
towards
mentioned
sub-dimensions,
as
well
engagement
preventive
measures
perception
various
disasters
with
particular
focus
socio-economic
impacts,
statistical
methods
including
t-tests,
one-way
ANOVA,
Pearson’s
correlation,
multivariate
linear
regression
were
employed.
regressions
across
subscales
indicate
that
age
emerged
most
significant
predictor
for
subscale.
At
same
time,
education
stood
primary
Additionally,
employment
status
proved
be
influential
both
equity-diversity
subscales,
property
ownership
being
key
beliefs
sub-scale.
Despite
considered
analyses,
gender,
marital
status,
income
level,
number
household
members
did
not
emerge
investigated
subscales.
determined
mean
value
index
is
M
=
2.62,
findings
reveal
assigned
highest
ratings
subscale
(M
2.76),
while
lowest
values
observed
2.46).
Findings
can
used
create
strategies
interventions
aimed
at
enhancing
communities
Serbia
by
addressing
intricate
interplay
characteristics,
factors,
ability
withstand,
adapt
to,
recover
different
