Business Strategy & Development,
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
6(4), P. 641 - 654
Published: Aug. 9, 2023
Abstract
Circular
economies
can,
at
best,
contribute
to
sustainable
development.
Nevertheless,
the
realisation
of
positive
social
and
environmental
impacts
depends
partially
on
dynamics
actors'
inclusion
in
circular
processes.
We
identify
factors
affecting
farmers
agricultural
residue
supply
chains
India
socio‐ecological
thereof.
also
introduce
a
framework
for
designing
inclusive
just
practices.
Information,
resources,
co‐operation,
co‐design
act
as
mediators
impacts.
The
failure
consider
these
aspects
may
lead
unintended
negative
consequences,
such
declined
soil
health
or
delays
other
operations.
outcomes
selling
are
linked
improved
livelihood
opportunities,
local
development
health.
Selling
is
only
partial
solution,
straw
management
methods,
incorporation,
should
be
applied.
Sustainable Development,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
32(5), P. 4726 - 4737
Published: Feb. 21, 2024
Abstract
The
scholarly
literature
highlights
the
relevance
of
social
dimension
circular
economy
(CE);
yet
empirical
analysis
this
issue
has
been
overlooked.
This
work
sheds
light
empirically
on
gap
with
a
fuzzy
Delphi
study
carried
out
in
region
strong
institutional
support
for
paradigm.
Through
consensus
25
experts,
set
impact
categories
CE
was
scrutinized.
results
contribute
to
widening
current
quantitative
vision
employment
generated
by
CE,
through
exploration
its
qualitative
aspects.
According
our
findings,
technological
innovation
high‐skilled
appears
be
crucial.
Likewise,
anticipate
impacts
derived
from
collaboration
among
stakeholders
context
still
at
an
incipient
stage.
expert
panel
also
socio‐cultural
and
behavioral
changes.
Implications
public
policy
makers
other
are
analyzed,
namely
development
monitoring
framework
CE.
Ecological Economics,
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
212, P. 107938 - 107938
Published: July 12, 2023
Indicator-based
methods
have
long
been
used
as
assessment
tools
in
relation
to
measuring
and
purportedly
enabling
sustainable
transitions.
Common
limitations
of
indicator
approaches
are
well
documented
the
literature,
include
both
technical
issues
related
data
availability
handling
complexity,
epistemological
challenges
such
nature
trade-offs
risks
associated
with
reductionism.
Nevertheless,
remain
popular
due
their
ability
convey
complex
information
timely
a
synthesised
way
policy-
decision-makers.
In
light
this,
burgeoning
literature
on
indicators
for
Circular
Economy
(CE),
we
aim
reflect
extent
which
suitable
engendering
transformative
social
ecological
transition
just
CE.
To
do
so,
examine
broad
by
considering
an
archetypal
three
step
process
selection,
framing,
implementation.
As
critical
CE
scholars
keen
repoliticise
embedding
principles
justice,
ask
what
serve
our
purposes,
whether
stance
towards
should
be
things
better
or
different?
Our
answer
this
is:
both.
Yet
emphasise
need
reconceive
‘better’
moving
beyond
fixes
problems
address
more
fundamental
rethink
purpose
approach
not
tool,
but
politicised
artefact
shaping
alternative
narratives.
Business Strategy & Development,
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
6(4), P. 641 - 654
Published: Aug. 9, 2023
Abstract
Circular
economies
can,
at
best,
contribute
to
sustainable
development.
Nevertheless,
the
realisation
of
positive
social
and
environmental
impacts
depends
partially
on
dynamics
actors'
inclusion
in
circular
processes.
We
identify
factors
affecting
farmers
agricultural
residue
supply
chains
India
socio‐ecological
thereof.
also
introduce
a
framework
for
designing
inclusive
just
practices.
Information,
resources,
co‐operation,
co‐design
act
as
mediators
impacts.
The
failure
consider
these
aspects
may
lead
unintended
negative
consequences,
such
declined
soil
health
or
delays
other
operations.
outcomes
selling
are
linked
improved
livelihood
opportunities,
local
development
health.
Selling
is
only
partial
solution,
straw
management
methods,
incorporation,
should
be
applied.
