On the Ecological Compensation Standard of Cultivated Land Under the “Separation of Three Rights”: From the Perspective of Contract Rights DOI Creative Commons
Nan Wang,

Kaisheng Long,

Wenke Liu

et al.

Land, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: 14(5), P. 1003 - 1003

Published: May 6, 2025

Contracting farmers are the main entities in cultivated land protection. From perspective of contractual rights, improving ecological compensation standards for under “Separation Three Rights” system helps coordinate interest relationships and serves as key to benefit distribution among multiple right-holders. Reasonable contracting facilitates dual consideration food security safety land. The study starts from connotation incorporates both opportunity cost losses values into criteria based on membership attributes rights nature use rights. Employing equivalent factor method, replacement it calculates transferred non-transferred farmers, using prefecture-level cities Jiangsu Province case examples. (1) Land-transferring contracted farmers: standard is calculated loss basis. (2) Non-transferring value generated through agricultural production. Research Findings: average farmland transfer 6275.79 CNY/hm2, primarily implemented government mechanisms. 40,604 a government–market–community collaborative mechanism. tiered criteria, by accounting differential contributions participants non-participants agro-ecosystem services, effectively reconcile imperatives arable preservation livelihood enhancement farmers.

Language: Английский

Unraveling the impact of urban expansion on vegetation carbon sequestration capacity: A case study of the Yangtze River Economic Belt DOI
Jinyang Wang, Zhenfeng Shao, Peng Fu

et al.

Sustainable Cities and Society, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: unknown, P. 106157 - 106157

Published: Jan. 1, 2025

Language: Английский

Citations

4
Spatio-temporal correlation between growth of science and technology innovation parks (STIPs) and urban development in Yangtze Delta region (YDR), China using remote sensing and GIS techniques DOI Creative Commons
Yue Wu, Siyuan Zhang, Auwalu Faisal Koko

et al.

Geocarto International, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: 40(1)

Published: Jan. 20, 2025

Language: Английский

Citations

1
A new framework for eco-compensation funds allocation in China based on multi-attribute decision-making method DOI

Chen Chi,

Juqin Shen,

Xin Huang

et al.

Environmental Impact Assessment Review, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: 114, P. 107891 - 107891

Published: March 5, 2025

Language: Английский

Citations

1
Exploration of ecological compensation standard: Based on ecosystem service flow path DOI
Zhongwei An, Caizhi Sun, Shuai Hao

et al.

Applied Geography, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: 178, P. 103588 - 103588

Published: March 12, 2025

Language: Английский

Citations

1
Payments for forest ecosystem services in China: a multi-function quantitative ecological compensation standard based on the Human Development Index DOI Creative Commons
Xiang Niu, Tingyu Xu, Bing Wang

et al.

Frontiers in Earth Science, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: 13

Published: March 10, 2025

Forest ecosystems provide many ecosystem services, and payment for these services has recently become a policy-relevant issue. This paper puts forward multi-function quantitative standard (MQECS) forest based on the Human Development Index six distinct service values. Using MQECS method, i total ecological compensation amount (TECA ) in Guangdong Liaoning provinces 2012 were calculated. The MQECSi of 663.02 225.27 RMB·hm −2 , TECAi 66.82 × 10 8 13.67 RMB, respectively. is approximately three times that Liaoning, government needs to increase investment per unit area by 176.25% 50.20% current achieve target standards. Additionally, method was also applied calculate different cities Liaoning. not only considers local government's ability pay but incorporates factors influencing human wellbeing valuation services. It suitable application management China.

Language: Английский

Citations

0
Integrating ecosystem service spillovers and environmental justice in ecological compensation: A pathway to effective ecological protection in China DOI

Minkun Chen,

Xibao Xu, Yan Tan

et al.

Ecological Indicators, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: 174, P. 113455 - 113455

Published: April 11, 2025

Language: Английский

Citations

0
Spatial heterogeneity and interacting intensity of drivers for Trade-offs and Synergies between Carbon Sequestration and Biodiversity DOI Creative Commons
Shuaiqi Yang, Shuangyun Peng, Xiaona Li

et al.

Global Ecology and Conservation, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: unknown, P. e03256 - e03256

Published: Oct. 1, 2024

Language: Английский

Citations

3
On the Ecological Compensation Standard of Cultivated Land Under the “Separation of Three Rights”: From the Perspective of Contract Rights DOI Creative Commons
Nan Wang,

Kaisheng Long,

Wenke Liu

et al.

Land, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: 14(5), P. 1003 - 1003

Published: May 6, 2025

Contracting farmers are the main entities in cultivated land protection. From perspective of contractual rights, improving ecological compensation standards for under “Separation Three Rights” system helps coordinate interest relationships and serves as key to benefit distribution among multiple right-holders. Reasonable contracting facilitates dual consideration food security safety land. The study starts from connotation incorporates both opportunity cost losses values into criteria based on membership attributes rights nature use rights. Employing equivalent factor method, replacement it calculates transferred non-transferred farmers, using prefecture-level cities Jiangsu Province case examples. (1) Land-transferring contracted farmers: standard is calculated loss basis. (2) Non-transferring value generated through agricultural production. Research Findings: average farmland transfer 6275.79 CNY/hm2, primarily implemented government mechanisms. 40,604 a government–market–community collaborative mechanism. tiered criteria, by accounting differential contributions participants non-participants agro-ecosystem services, effectively reconcile imperatives arable preservation livelihood enhancement farmers.

Language: Английский

Citations

0