Ecological rule of law and enterprise green innovation — Evidence from China's environmental courts
Journal of Environmental Management,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
374, P. 124081 - 124081
Published: Jan. 9, 2025
Language: Английский
Impact of Environmental Protection Tax on Enterprise Digital Transformation: Evidence from Chinese Listed Firms
Xinyu Zhang,
No information about this author
Yixuan Liu,
No information about this author
Shaoze Yu
No information about this author
et al.
International Review of Economics & Finance,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
unknown, P. 103743 - 103743
Published: Nov. 1, 2024
Language: Английский
Environmental Protection Tax Legislation and Corporate Reputation in China: A Legal Perspective
Finance research letters,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
unknown, P. 106790 - 106790
Published: Jan. 1, 2025
Language: Английский
Research on the comprehensive effect of the Porter hypothesis of environmental protection tax regulation in China
Mingjun Chen,
No information about this author
Zhou Jian-ya
No information about this author
Environmental Sciences Europe,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
37(1)
Published: Feb. 20, 2025
Language: Английский
Greening through AI? The impact of Artificial Intelligence Innovation and Development Pilot Zones on green innovation in China
Energy Economics,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
unknown, P. 108507 - 108507
Published: April 1, 2025
Language: Английский
Quantifying the nonlinear relationships between environmental policy components and share energy from renewable sources
Journal of Environmental Management,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
380, P. 125065 - 125065
Published: March 26, 2025
Language: Английский
The Impact of Water Resources Tax Reform on Corporate ESG Performance: Patent Evidence from China
Jianmin Wen,
No information about this author
Xiang Ji,
No information about this author
Xue Wu
No information about this author
et al.
Water,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
17(7), P. 959 - 959
Published: March 25, 2025
This
paper
uses
a
difference-in-differences
approach
to
investigate
how
China’s
water
resources
tax
reform
influences
corporate
Environmental,
Social
and
Governance
(ESG)
performance.
Drawing
on
panel
dataset
of
A-share
listed
companies
from
2013
2023,
we
find
that
the
significantly
improves
firms’
ESG
ratings,
result
holds
under
multiple
robustness
checks.
Mechanism
tests
reveal
this
positive
effect
operates
through
enhanced
green
technological
innovation,
increased
environmental
investment,
heightened
pressure
capital
markets,
with
media
attention
further
reinforcing
these
pathways.
Heterogeneity
analyses
indicate
state-owned
enterprises
larger
firms
experience
particularly
strong
improvements
following
reform.
These
findings
provide
empirical
evidence
effectiveness
government-led
governance
policies
offer
practical
insights
for
promoting
transformation
in
sector.
Language: Английский
An executive's environmental background and corporate environmental responsibility performance: Evidence from green investors and environmental investment
Kun Luo,
No information about this author
Wenxi Sun,
No information about this author
Nan Yang
No information about this author
et al.
Environment Development and Sustainability,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
unknown
Published: May 10, 2025
Language: Английский
Environmental taxes promote the synergy between pollution and carbon reduction: Provincial evidence from China
Journal of Environmental Management,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
372, P. 123378 - 123378
Published: Nov. 24, 2024
Language: Английский
Policy Simulation of the Coordinated Development of Environmental Governance and Urbanization in the Beijing–Tianjin-Hebei Region: A Study Using a Multi-Regional CGE Model
Qianqian Meng,
No information about this author
Ziying Jia,
No information about this author
Huixue Yang
No information about this author
et al.
Sustainability,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
16(23), P. 10213 - 10213
Published: Nov. 22, 2024
Ecological
environmental
governance
is
not
only
a
crucial
aspect
of
the
urbanization
process,
but
also
key
factor
for
achieving
coordinated
development
between
regional
economies
and
environment.
This
study
utilizes
multi-regional
Computable
General
Equilibrium
(CGE)
model
to
simulate
impact
varying
degrees
on
in
Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei
region.
The
results
indicate
that
ecological
may
exert
certain
negative
effects
processes,
such
as
GDP,
household
income,
industrial
output;
however,
it
helps
reduce
pollution
some
extent.
From
different
scenarios
examined,
we
observed
both
fully
local
proportional
result
impacts
Beijing,
Tianjin,
Hebei.
However,
significant
differences
are
evident
among
three
regions.
least
pronounced
followed
by
while
Hebei
experiences
far
greater
disruptions,
with
economic
declines
exceeding
7%,
significantly
surpassing
its
capacity
cope.
Based
these
findings,
this
paper
proposes
several
policy
recommendations,
including
necessity
differentiated
intensities
governance,
gradual
expansion
scope,
implementation
diverse
combination
policies
air
control
emissions
reduction.
Language: Английский