Energy, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: unknown, P. 136179 - 136179
Published: April 1, 2025
Language: Английский
Energy, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: unknown, P. 136179 - 136179
Published: April 1, 2025
Language: Английский
Published: Jan. 1, 2025
A techno-economic analysis is performed on the negative CO2 emission gas power plant (nCO2PP) vs combined cycle turbine (CCGT) with carbon capture and storage (CCS). In nCO2PP it can be distinguished following three islands: fuel preparation, generation separation capture, respectively. The CCGT CCS are modeled in commercial software. amine has been used as reference to represent state-of-the-art technology. Both CAPEX OPEX well incomes from sewage sludge disposal avoided emissions have included analyses. boundary of cost analyses includes plants, processes conditioning. results show that levelized electricity (LCOE) using exhaust gasifier comparable capture. Due high electrical energy consumption equipment cost, LCOE much higher when plasma used. strongly depends income emissions. Further reductions expected for development technology maturity.
Language: Английский
Citations
0Energy, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: unknown, P. 136179 - 136179
Published: April 1, 2025
Language: Английский
Citations
0