The potential of gardening and other plant‐related interventions to reduce symptoms of depression: A systematic review of non‐randomized controlled trials and uncontrolled studies DOI Creative Commons
Claudio D. Rosa, Talisson Santos Chaves, Silvia Collado

et al.

People and Nature, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: unknown

Published: Dec. 2, 2024

Abstract Previous systematic reviews have examined the effect of horticultural interventions (e.g., taking care plants, planting, gardening) on individuals' depressive symptoms through analyses focused exclusively randomized controlled trials, but that approach overlooks a majority potentially informative published research. To complement previous work, we searched databases MEDLINE, PsycArticles, SCOPUS, Google Scholar, and ClinicalTrials.gov identified 30 non‐RCTs ( n = 1063 participants; all adults) 32 uncontrolled studies 517 only one study included 6 young people) examining effects depression. Using random meta‐analysis, discovered evidence from these largely supports findings RCTs. Like RCTs, indicate some combined with usual (i.e., continuing normal routine for healthy people or conventional treatment unhealthy ones) may reduce more than alone, most finding moderate (Hedges' g ≥ 0.5) large 0.8). We also found participants might adhere similarly well even better to no adverse events were reported. Twenty‐five reported pre post‐intervention mean depression scores. Of 25 studies, 24 an improvement in scores and, 16 them, was greater 20%. All present risk bias due design limitations, publication detected. Our support assertions are effective safe as complementary strategy adults' symptoms. More research is needed understand how specific participant intervention characteristics can influence success Read free Plain Language Summary this article Journal blog.

Language: Английский

Nature, activity, and social drivers of mental resilience: a test with mid-life women surfers DOI
Ralf Buckley, Mary‐Ann Cooper

Tourism Recreation Research, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: unknown, P. 1 - 14

Published: Jan. 2, 2025

Nature exposure improves mental health, human capital, and economic productivity. Outcomes are well established, drivers mechanisms less so. Thrill + skill activities, additional to exercise nature, least studied. We analyse their effects for 40 mid-life women surfers in 16 countries, contrasted with hikers. use an 11-year ethnography, semi-structured interviews, thematic analysis under interpretive grounded theory. The perceive that surfing strongly resilience stress, irrespective of any concurrent clinical therapy. They identify three mechanisms: creating happiness or joy; activity, thrill, triumph self-esteem; social, support friendship from other surfers. these as building a cumulative buffer gratitude life, which provides against setbacks. In large-scale implementation nature-based healthcare, both nature-only nature adventure products valuable. outdoor recreation sector practical options.

Language: Английский

Citations

0
Associations between depression and nature-based recreation: A cross-sectional study of adults in the United States, Spain, and Brazil DOI Creative Commons
Claudio D. Rosa, Lincoln R. Larson, Silvia Collado

et al.

Scientific Reports, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: 15(1)

Published: Feb. 10, 2025

Abstract Cumulating evidence suggests that nature-based interventions may alleviate depression, but the association between engagement in activities and specific depressive symptoms remains unknown. We conducted a cross-sectional study to investigate how Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) symptom criteria relate recreation (any activities, forest-based gardening, adventure activities) among American ( n = 606), Spanish 438), Brazilian 448) adults (≥ 18 years old). People who reported engaging any at least once per month experiencing all nine for MDD (e.g., anhedonia, feeling depressed or hopeless, sleep problems, trouble concentrating, suicidal ideation) lower rates than those did not participate as frequently. Results were relatively consistent across countries types of suggesting many forms are negatively correlated with MDD. The associations tended be weaker overall respondents. Nature-based appeared have stronger inverse relationship ideation other symptoms. design this limits causal interpretation observed associations. If future experimental studies confirm our findings, practitioners different can consider recommending participation their clients’

Language: Английский

Citations

0
Physical nature associated with affective well-being, but technological nature falls short: Insights from an intensive longitudinal field study in the United States DOI
Michelle Ng, Yikun Chi, Nilàm Ram

et al.

Journal of Environmental Psychology, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: unknown, P. 102611 - 102611

Published: April 1, 2025

Language: Английский

Citations

0
The potential of gardening and other plant‐related interventions to reduce symptoms of depression: A systematic review of non‐randomized controlled trials and uncontrolled studies DOI Creative Commons
Claudio D. Rosa, Talisson Santos Chaves, Silvia Collado

et al.

People and Nature, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: unknown

Published: Dec. 2, 2024

Abstract Previous systematic reviews have examined the effect of horticultural interventions (e.g., taking care plants, planting, gardening) on individuals' depressive symptoms through analyses focused exclusively randomized controlled trials, but that approach overlooks a majority potentially informative published research. To complement previous work, we searched databases MEDLINE, PsycArticles, SCOPUS, Google Scholar, and ClinicalTrials.gov identified 30 non‐RCTs ( n = 1063 participants; all adults) 32 uncontrolled studies 517 only one study included 6 young people) examining effects depression. Using random meta‐analysis, discovered evidence from these largely supports findings RCTs. Like RCTs, indicate some combined with usual (i.e., continuing normal routine for healthy people or conventional treatment unhealthy ones) may reduce more than alone, most finding moderate (Hedges' g ≥ 0.5) large 0.8). We also found participants might adhere similarly well even better to no adverse events were reported. Twenty‐five reported pre post‐intervention mean depression scores. Of 25 studies, 24 an improvement in scores and, 16 them, was greater 20%. All present risk bias due design limitations, publication detected. Our support assertions are effective safe as complementary strategy adults' symptoms. More research is needed understand how specific participant intervention characteristics can influence success Read free Plain Language Summary this article Journal blog.

Language: Английский

Citations

0