Frontiers in Environmental Science,
Journal Year:
2022,
Volume and Issue:
10
Published: July 19, 2022
Monthly
runoff
forecasting
plays
a
vital
role
in
reservoir
ecological
operation,
which
can
reduce
the
negative
impact
of
dam
construction
and
operation
on
river
ecosystem.
Numerous
studies
have
been
conducted
to
improve
monthly
forecast
accuracy,
machine
learning
methods
paid
much
attention
due
their
unique
advantages.
In
this
study,
conjunction
model,
EEMD-SSA-LSTM
for
short,
comprises
ensemble
empirical
mode
decomposition
(EEMD)
sparrow
search
algorithm
(SSA)–based
long
short-term
neural
networks
(LSTM),
has
proposed
forecasting.
The
model
is
mainly
carried
out
three
steps.
First,
original
time
series
data
decomposed
into
several
sub-sequences.
Second,
each
sub-sequence
simulated
by
LSTM,
hyperparameters
are
optimized
SSA.
Finally,
results
summarized
as
final
results.
obtained
from
two
reservoirs
located
China
used
validate
performance.
Meanwhile,
four
commonly
statistical
evaluation
indexes
utilized
evaluate
demonstrate
that
compared
benchmark
models,
yield
satisfactory
be
conducive
improving
accuracy.
IEEE Access,
Journal Year:
2022,
Volume and Issue:
10, P. 71054 - 71090
Published: Jan. 1, 2022
The
main
and
pivot
part
of
electric
companies
is
the
load
forecasting.
Decision-makers
think
tank
power
sectors
should
forecast
future
need
electricity
with
large
accuracy
small
error
to
give
uninterrupted
free
shedding
consumers.
demand
can
be
forecasted
amicably
by
many
Machine
Learning
(ML),
Deep
(DL)
Artificial
Intelligence
(AI)
techniques
among
which
hybrid
methods
are
most
popular.
present
technologies
forecasting
work
regarding
combination
various
ML,
DL
AI
algorithms
reviewed
in
this
paper.
comprehensive
review
single
models
functions;
advantages
disadvantages
discussed
comparison
between
performance
terms
Mean
Absolute
Error
(MAE),
Root
Squared
(RMSE),
Percentage
(MAPE)
values
compared
literature
different
support
researchers
select
best
model
for
prediction.
This
validates
fact
that
will
provide
a
more
optimal
solution.
Water,
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
15(4), P. 620 - 620
Published: Feb. 5, 2023
In
accordance
with
the
rapid
proliferation
of
machine
learning
(ML)
and
data
management,
ML
applications
have
evolved
to
encompass
all
engineering
disciplines.
Owing
importance
world’s
water
supply
throughout
rest
this
century,
much
research
has
been
concentrated
on
application
strategies
integrated
resources
management
(WRM).
Thus,
a
thorough
well-organized
review
that
is
required.
To
accommodate
underlying
knowledge
interests
both
artificial
intelligence
(AI)
unresolved
issues
in
WRM,
overview
divides
core
fundamentals,
major
applications,
ongoing
into
two
sections.
First,
basic
are
categorized
three
main
groups,
prediction,
clustering,
reinforcement
learning.
Moreover,
literature
organized
each
field
according
new
perspectives,
patterns
indicated
so
attention
can
be
directed
toward
where
headed.
second
part,
less
investigated
WRM
addressed
provide
grounds
for
future
studies.
The
widespread
tools
projected
accelerate
formation
sustainable
plans
over
next
decade.
Agricultural Water Management,
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
283, P. 108302 - 108302
Published: April 14, 2023
Precise
evapotranspiration
(ET)
estimation
is
critical
for
agricultural
water
management,
particularly
in
water-stressed
developing
countries.
Vapor
Pressure
Deficit
one
of
the
ET
parameters
that
has
a
significant
impact
on
its
calculation
(VPD).
This
paper
forecasts
VPD
using
ensemble
learning-based
modeling
eight
different
regions
(Dakahliyah,
Gharbiyah,
Kafr
Elsheikh,
Dumyat,
Port
Said,
Ismailia,
Sharqiyah,
and
Qalubiyah)
Egypt.
In
this
study,
six
machine
learning
algorithms
were
used:
Linear
Regression
(LR),
Additive
regression
trees
(ART),
Random
SubSpace
(RSS),
Forest
(RF),
Reduced
Error
Pruning
Tree
(REPTree),
Quinlan's
M5
algorithm
(M5P).
Monthly
vapor
pressure
data
obtained
from
Japanese
55-year
Reanalysis
JRA-55
1958
to
2021.
The
dateset
been
divided
into
two
segments:
training
stage
(1958–2005)
testing
(2006–2021).
Five
statistical
measures
used
evaluate
model
performances:
Correlation
Coefficient
(CC),
Mean
Absolute
(MAE),
Root
Square
(RMSE),
Relative
absolute
error
(RAE),
Squared
(RRSE),
across
both
stages.
RF
outperformed
rest
models
[CC
=
0.9694;
MAE
0.0967;
RMSE
0.1252;
RAE
(%)
21.7297
RRSE
24.0356],
followed
closely
by
REPTree
RSS
models.
On
other
hand,
M5P
performance
remained
moderate
LR
AR
worst.
During
stage,
terms
(which
statistic),
study
recommended
future
hydro-climatological
studies
general,
deficit
prediction
particular.
enables
magnitudes
be
predicted,
alerting
authorities
administrators
involved
focus
their
policy-making
more
specific
pathways
toward
climate
adaptation.
Scientific Reports,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
15(1)
Published: March 28, 2025
This
paper
presents
a
machine
learning
(ML)
model
designed
to
track
the
maximum
power
point
of
standalone
Photovoltaic
(PV)
systems.
Due
nonlinear
nature
generation
in
PV
systems,
influenced
by
fluctuating
weather
conditions,
managing
this
data
effectively
remains
challenge.
As
result,
use
ML
techniques
optimize
systems
at
their
MPP
is
highly
beneficial.
To
achieve
this,
research
explores
various
algorithms,
such
as
Linear
Regression
(LR),
Ridge
(RR),
Lasso
(Lasso
R),
Bayesian
(BR),
Decision
Tree
(DTR),
Gradient
Boosting
(GBR),
and
Artificial
Neural
Networks
(ANN),
predict
The
utilizes
from
unit's
technical
specifications,
allowing
algorithms
forecast
power,
current,
voltage
based
on
given
irradiance
temperature
inputs.
Predicted
also
used
determine
boost
converter's
duty
cycle.
simulation
was
conducted
100
kW
solar
panel
with
an
open-circuit
64.2
V
short-circuit
current
5.96
A.
Model
performance
evaluated
using
metrics
Root
Mean
Square
Error
(RMSE),
Coefficient
Determination
(R2),
Absolute
(MAE).
Additionally,
study
assessed
correlation
feature
importance
evaluate
compatibility
factors
impacting
predictive
accuracy
models.
Results
showed
that
DTR
algorithm
outperformed
others
like
LR,
RR,
R,
BR,
GBR,
ANN
predicting
(Im),
(Vm),
(Pm)
system.
achieved
RMSE,
MAE,
R2
values
0.006,
0.004,
0.99999
for
Im,
0.015,
0.0036,
Vm,
2.36,
0.871,
Pm.
Factors
size
training
dataset,
operating
conditions
system,
type,
preprocessing
were
found
significantly
influence
prediction
accuracy.