Mitteilungen Klosterneuburg,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
unknown
Published: Jan. 1, 2024
Objectives:
During
the
COVID-19
pandemic,
potential
impact
of
vaccinations
on
menstrual
cycle
patterns
was
not
initially
a
widely
discussed
side
effect.
However,
as
global
race
to
develop
an
effective
vaccine
intensified,
significant
concern
arose
about
effects
disturbances,
catapulting
this
issue
forefront
health
priorities.
Materials
and
Methods
Our
study
employed
unique
descriptive
cross-sectional
design,
using
face-to-face
interviews
meticulously
structured
questionnaire
collect
data.
We
focused
menstruating
women
aged
18
50
from
May
31
July
31,
2022,
specifically
asked
their
cycles
in
first
12
following
either
infection
or
vaccination.
Results
The
survey
completed;
244
who
had
confirmed
infections
305
received
at
least
two
doses
recommended
by
authorities.
Among
these,
80
(32%)
reported
changes
post-infection,
48
(15.74%)
noted
Conclusion
findings
highlight
critical,
interrelated
conclusions.
Firstly,
vaccination
can
directly
affect
cycle,
notwithstanding
momentarily.
Secondly,
most
alterations
dissipate
within
six
months
post-infection
after
receiving
third
dose
Medicine,
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
102(50), P. e36638 - e36638
Published: Dec. 15, 2023
Concerns
about
a
possible
relationship
between
vaccination
against
Coronavirus
Disease
2019
(COVID-19)
and
menstrual
disorders
have
been
raised
in
the
media.
In
addition,
different
studies
shown
that
COVID-19
vaccine
may
be
associated
with
changes.
This
study
was
conducted
to
investigate
effects
of
vaccines
on
cycle
women.
cross-sectional
descriptive
August
16
September
17,
2021.
Data
were
collected
through
self-administered
questionnaire
via
an
online
form
sent
participants
social
586
women
included
this
study.
A
total
82.4%
(n
=
483)
aged
31
50
years.
The
BioNTech
(2
doses)
administered
75.8%
444),
Sinovac
(3
9.0%
53)
participants.
53.1%
311)
experienced
changes
their
cycles.
most
common
after
delayed
menstruation
176;
30.0%)
prolonged
duration
132;
22.5%).
Menstrual
delay,
duration,
heavy
bleeding,
early
more
than
prior
receiving
(P
<
.05).
More
half
vaccine.
Women
significantly
higher
rates
bleeding
compared
before
vaccination.
Indian Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology Research,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
11(1), P. 70 - 74
Published: Feb. 15, 2024
:
SARS
COV-2
vaccination
was
a
global
effort
to
tackle
the
Covid-19
pandemic.
During
drive,
several
concerns
were
raised
about
potential
adverse
effects
of
vaccines,
which
included
impact
on
menstruation
and
fertility
in
women.
This
study
aimed
assess
experiences
Indian
Women
with
covid
its
their
menstruation.
A
prospective
web-based
survey
conducted
targeting
women
aged
18years
above
who
had
taken
atleast
one
dose
vaccine.
The
total
number
responses
received
363.
After
excluding
those
missing
details,
342
respondents
analysis.
mean
age
participants
38.02
±
7.8
years.
68.1%
(233/342)
reported
no
change
periodicity
cycles
post
79.5%
(272/342)
menstrual
flow.
Forty
three
(12.6%)
experiencing
heavy
flow
vaccination.
In
this
group
experienced
menses,
81.5%
(35/43)
that
menses
self-limiting
did
not
require
any
treatment.
9.3%
(4/43)
these
symptomatic
recorded
short
term
treatment
sought.
Another
persisting
changes,
at
time
survey,
despite
taking
prescribed
It
also
noted
changes
significantly
more
vaccinated
nulliparous
Covid
appears
have
or
little
two-thirds
31.9%
some
timing
Most
self
-limiting.
About
1%
(4/342)
may
longer
standing
impact,
requiring
Mitteilungen Klosterneuburg,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
unknown
Published: Jan. 1, 2024
Objectives:
During
the
COVID-19
pandemic,
potential
impact
of
vaccinations
on
menstrual
cycle
patterns
was
not
initially
a
widely
discussed
side
effect.
However,
as
global
race
to
develop
an
effective
vaccine
intensified,
significant
concern
arose
about
effects
disturbances,
catapulting
this
issue
forefront
health
priorities.
Materials
and
Methods
Our
study
employed
unique
descriptive
cross-sectional
design,
using
face-to-face
interviews
meticulously
structured
questionnaire
collect
data.
We
focused
menstruating
women
aged
18
50
from
May
31
July
31,
2022,
specifically
asked
their
cycles
in
first
12
following
either
infection
or
vaccination.
Results
The
survey
completed;
244
who
had
confirmed
infections
305
received
at
least
two
doses
recommended
by
authorities.
Among
these,
80
(32%)
reported
changes
post-infection,
48
(15.74%)
noted
Conclusion
findings
highlight
critical,
interrelated
conclusions.
Firstly,
vaccination
can
directly
affect
cycle,
notwithstanding
momentarily.
Secondly,
most
alterations
dissipate
within
six
months
post-infection
after
receiving
third
dose