Regular and Young Investigator Award Abstracts,
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
unknown, P. A1369 - A1371
Published: Oct. 31, 2023
Background
Immune-related
adverse
events
(irAEs)
induced
by
immune
checkpoint
inhibitor
(ICI)
therapy
can
involve
multiple
organ
systems,
of
which
cutaneous
irAEs
(c-irAEs)
are
the
most
common.1–5
Understanding
co-occurrence
patterns
and
prognostic
outcomes
is
critical
for
immunotherapy
management.
However,
previous
studies
have
been
limited
cohort
size,
thus
limiting
generalizability.6–8
In
addition,
prior
study
approaches
primarily
utilized
pairwise
comparison
analyses,
examination
irAE
relationships
to
two
systems
at
a
time.
this
study,
we
leverage
population-level
database
compare
results
multi-institutional
from
tertiary-level
academic
healthcare
system
investigate
their
impact
on
through
non-negative
matrix
factorization
(NMF),9
allows
multi-organ
analyses.
Methods
After
propensity-matching
in
1:2
ratio
based
demographic
cancer-related
variables
exclusion
ambiguous
cases,
analyses
included
9,273
patients
Mass
General
Brigham
Healthcare
System
(MGB)
23,689
TriNetX
network
(figure
1).
The
identification
was
ICD
codes.
Pairwise
correlation
analysis
NMF
were
conducted
patterns.
Multivariate
landmark
evaluate
associated
overall
survival,
adjusting
demographics,
cancer
type,
ICI
type.
Results
Characteristics
MGB
shown
(table
showed
with
c-irAEs
increased
risk
developing
an
nine
eleven
evaluated.
non-cutaneous
(nc-irAEs)
improved
survival
(HR:0.68,
CI,
0.61–0.76;
p<0.001)
2).
identified
four
unique
patient
clusters,
three
consistent
between
cohorts:
c-irAEs,
endocrine
irAEs,
internal
(comprising
mostly
neurologic,
respiratory,
gastrointestinal
irAEs)
Cutaneous
clusters
strongly
favorable
prognoses
across
all
times
3).
endocrine-dominant
cluster
displayed
better
prognosis
(MGB:
HR=0.48,
p<0.001;
TriNetX:
HR=0.58,
compared
Cutaneous-dominant
HR=0.55,
HR=0.65,
p<0.001).
Conclusions
Our
demonstrates
that
who
develop
significantly
toxicities
other
organs.
This
emphasizes
importance
monitoring,
diagnosing,
managing
given
valuable
benefit.
specifically
found
significant
benefit
among
irAEs.
may
suggest
underlying
mechanisms
differ
interactions,
will
require
future
elucidate.
References
Ramos-Casals
M,
Brahmer
JR,
Callahan
MK,
et
al.
inhibitors.
Nat
Rev
Dis
Primers.
2020;6(1):1–21.
Doi:10.1038/s41572–020-0160–6
Puzanov
I,
Diab
A,
Abdallah
K,
Managing
inhibitors:
consensus
recommendations
Society
Immunotherapy
Cancer
(SITC)
Toxicity
Management
Working
Group.
J
Immunother
Cancer.
2017;5(1):95.
Doi:10.1186/S40425–017-0300-Z
Lacchetti
C,
Schneider
BJ,
immune-related
treated
therapy:
American
society
clinical
oncology
practice
guideline.
Journal
Clinical
Oncology.
2018;36(17):1714–1768.
Doi:10.1200/JCO.2017.77.6385
Le
TK,
Brown
Goldberg
R,
Toxicities
Associated
Immune
Checkpoint
Inhibitors:
An
Observational,
Pharmacovigilance
Study.
Invest
Dermatol.
2022;142(11):2896–2908.e4.
doi:10.1016/J.JID.2022.04.020
Wongvibulsin
S,
Pahalyants
V,
Kalinich
Epidemiology
factors
development
immune-checkpoint
A
United
States
analysis.
Am
Acad
2022;86(3):563–572.
Doi:10.1016/J.JAAD.2021.03.094
Chieng
JHL,
Htet
ZW,
Zhao
JJ,
Presentation
Immune-Related
Endocrine
Adverse
Events
during
Inhibitor
Treatment.
Cancers
(Basel).
2022;14(11):2687.
Doi:10.3390/CANCERS14112687
Yamada
Nakamura
Yamamura
T,
characteristics
inhibitors
association
survival.
World
J
Gastroenterol.
2021;27(41):7190.
Doi:10.3748/WJG.V27.I41.7190
Asdourian
MS,
Shah
N,
Jacoby
T
Development
after
blockade.
2023;88(2):485–487.
Doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2022.06.030
Pedregosa
FABIANPEDREGOSA
F,
Michel
Grisel
OLIVIERGRISEL
O,
Scikit-learn:
Machine
Learning
Python.
Research.
2011;12(85):2825–2830.
Accessed
February
24,
2023.
http://jmlr.org/papers/v12/pedregosa11a.html
Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
12(4), P. e007675 - e007675
Published: April 1, 2024
With
an
increasing
number
of
patients
eligible
for
immune
checkpoint
inhibitors,
the
incidence
immune-related
adverse
events
(irAEs)
is
on
rise.
Dermatologic
(D-irAEs)
are
most
common
and
earliest
to
manifest,
often
with
important
downstream
consequences
patient.
Current
guidelines
lack
clarity
in
terms
diagnostic
criteria
D-irAEs.
The
goal
this
project
better
define
D-irAE
purposes
identification,
diagnosis,
future
study
group
diseases.The
objectives
were
develop
consensus
guidance
approach
D-irAEs
including
disease
definitions
severity
grading.
Knowing
that
among
oncologists,
dermatologists,
irAE
subspecialists
would
be
critical
usability,
we
formed
a
Disease
Definition
Panel.
panel
was
composed
34
experts,
rheumatologist,
allergist/immunologist
from
22
institutions
across
USA
internationally.
A
modified
Delphi
process
used,
two
rounds
anonymous
ratings
by
panelists
virtual
meetings
discuss
areas
controversy.
Panelists
rated
content
appropriateness,
accuracy
9-point
scales
electronic
surveys
provided
free
text
comments.
working
aggregated
survey
responses
incorporated
them
into
revised
definitions.
Consensus
based
numeric
using
RAND/UCLA
Appropriateness
Method
prespecified
definitions.Following
revisions
panelist
feedback,
all
items
received
second
round
ratings.
achieved
10
core
diagnoses:
ICI-vitiligo,
ICI-lichen
planus,
ICI-psoriasis,
ICI-exanthem,
ICI-bullous
pemphigoid,
ICI-Grover's,
ICI-eczematous,
ICI-eruptive
atypical
squamous
proliferation,
ICI-pruritus
without
rash,
ICI-erosive
mucocutaneous.
standard
evaluation
also
found
reach
consensus,
disease-specific
exceptions
detailed
when
necessary.
Each
disorder's
description
includes
further
details
subtypes,
symptoms,
supportive
exam
findings,
three
levels
certainty
(definite,
probable,
possible).These
consensus-driven
standardize
classification
useable
framework
multiple
disciplines
will
foundation
work.
Given
their
usability
representative
group,
anticipate
they
can
used
broadly
clinical
research
settings.
Clinical and Translational Science,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
18(1)
Published: Jan. 1, 2025
Targeted
therapy
and
immunotherapy
drugs
for
oncology
have
greater
efficacy
tolerability
than
cytotoxic
chemotherapeutic
drugs.
However,
the
cutaneous
adverse
drug
reactions
associated
with
these
newer
therapies
are
more
common
remain
poorly
predicted.
An
effective
prediction
model
is
urgently
needed
essential.
This
retrospective
study
included
1052
patients,
divided
into
train
set,
test
external
validation
set.
As
a
data-driven
study,
total
of
76
variables
were
collected.
Univariate
logistic
analysis,
least
absolute
shrinkage
selection
operator
regression,
stepwise
regression
utilized
feature
screening.
Finally,
nine
machine-learning
models
constructed
compared,
grid
search
was
performed
to
adjust
parameters.
Model
performance
evaluated
using
calibration
curve
area
under
receiver
operating
characteristic
(AUROC).
Nine
risk
factors
eventually
identified:
age,
treatment
modality,
cancer
types,
history
allergies,
age-corrected
Charlson
comorbidity
index,
percentage
eosinophils,
number
monocytes,
Eastern
Cooperative
Oncology
Group
Performance
Status,
C-reactive
protein.
Among
models,
best,
demonstrating
strong
in
set
(AUROC
=
0.734)
0.817).
identified
significant
developed
nomogram
model.
These
findings
important
implications
optimizing
therapeutic
maintaining
quality
life
patients
from
perspective
managing
reactions.
Trial
Registration:
ChiCTR2400088422.
British Journal of Dermatology,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
191(1), P. 117 - 124
Published: Feb. 15, 2024
Abstract
Background
Cutaneous
immune-related
adverse
events
(cirAEs)
are
the
most
common
toxicities
to
occur
in
setting
of
immune
checkpoint
inhibitor
(ICI)
therapy.
Identifying
patients
who
at
increased
risk
developing
cirAEs
may
improve
quality
life
and
outcomes.
Objectives
To
investigate
influence
cancer
type
histology
on
development
ICI
therapy
survival
Methods
This
retrospective
cohort
study
included
recruited
between
1
December
2011
30
October
2020.
They
received
from
2020
with
follow-up
outcomes
through
2021.
We
identified
3668
recipients
were
seen
Massachusetts
General
Brigham
Dana-Farber.
Of
these,
669
developed
cirAEs.
Records
that
incomplete
or
categories
insufficient
sample
size
excluded
cohort.
Multivariate
Cox
proportional
hazards
models
used
impact
organ
system
cirAE
development,
after
adjusting
for
demographics,
Charlson
Comorbidity
Index,
type,
stage
initiation,
year
initiation.
Time-varying
modelling
was
examine
mortality.
Results
Compared
other
nonepithelial
cancers
(neuroendocrine,
leukaemia,
lymphoma,
myeloma,
sarcoma
central
nervous
malignancies),
cutaneous
squamous
cell
carcinoma
[cSCC;
hazard
ratio
(HR)
3.57,
P
<
0.001],
melanoma
(HR
2.09,
0.001),
head
neck
adenocarcinoma
2.13,
=
0.009),
genitourinary
transitional
2.15,
0.001)
1.53,
0.037)
significantly
higher
multivariate
analyses.
The
translated
into
an
adjusted
benefit
0.37,
cSCC
0.51,
0.011).
Conclusions
highest
rate
subsequent
benefits
observed
malignancies
treated
therapies.
improves
our
understanding
would,
therefore,
appropriate
counselling
closer
monitoring
by
their
oncologists
dermatologists
throughout
Limitations
include
its
nature
one
geography.
Australasian Journal of Dermatology,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
65(3), P. 243 - 253
Published: April 4, 2024
The
immune
checkpoint
inhibitors
(ICIs)
have
been
increasingly
associated
with
severe
cutaneous
adverse
reactions
(SCARs).
These
reactions,
including
Stevens-Johnson
syndrome
(SJS),
toxic
epidermal
necrolysis
(TEN),
drug
reaction
eosinophilia
and
systemic
symptoms
(DRESS)
acute
generalized
exanthematous
pustulosis
(AGEP)
are
uncommon
but
potentially
lethal.
Despite
the
severity
of
these
growing
association
ICIs,
their
specific
risk
mortality
rates
largely
unexplored.
Heliyon,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
10(13), P. e33765 - e33765
Published: July 1, 2024
BackgroundThe
increasing
adoption
of
immune
checkpoint
inhibitors
(ICIs)
in
clinical
settings
highlights
their
efficacy
treating
diverse
conditions,
while
also
emphasizing
the
potential
for
common
cutaneous
adverse
reactions
to
arise.
The
aim
this
study
is
investigate
a
multitude
impacting
factors
and
determinants
among
patients
presenting
with
ICI-associated
reactions.MethodsWe
conducted
comprehensive
analysis
using
data
from
FAERS.
Our
spans
January
1,
2015,
March
31,
2023,
focusing
on
ICIs,
including
anti-PD-1,
anti-PD-L1,
anti-CTLA-4
agents.FindingsAmong
334,293
reported
irAR,
17,431
were
identified
as
(ARs).
Predominant
ARs
included
rash
(21.01
%),
pruritus
(11.22
pemphigoid
(3.90
%).
Stevens-Johnson
syndrome
emerged
most
severe
reaction
(SCAR)
(2.08
Anti-CTLA-4
agents
exhibited
higher
toxicity
compared
anti-PD-1
anti-PD-L1
agents.
Anti-PD-1
demonstrated
an
elevated
mortality
rate.
combined
use
ICIs
chemotherapy
amplified
risk
SCAR
mortality.
Targeted
therapy
was
factor
but
associated
reduced
median
onset
day
21
days,
SCAR,
it
23
days.
Weight
age
predictors
toxicity,
Skin
cancer
increased
skin
lung
heightened
formation.
number
administered
positively
correlated
mortality.InterpretationThis
significance
early
identification
effective
management
toxicities,
along
personalized
follow-up
care,
essential
strategies
minimizing
risks
preventing
treatment
disruptions.
Expert Review of Clinical Immunology,
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
19(9), P. 1117 - 1129
Published: June 5, 2023
Introduction
Immune
checkpoint
inhibitors
(ICIs)
have
become
a
pillar
of
treatment
for
numerous
cancers
with
increasing
use
in
combination
other
ICIs
and
earlier
stages
disease
treatment.
Although
effective,
ICI
is
accompanied
by
milieu
potentially
bothersome
or
even
life-threatening
toxicities
known
as
immune-related
adverse
events
(irAEs),
necessitating
careful
monitoring
early
intervention.Areas
covered
In
this
review,
we
provide
an
overview
recent
advances
surrounding
toxicity
pathophysiology
the
context
relevant
organ
systems.
An
emphasis
on
current
treatments
toxicity,
well
updates
steroid-refractory
toxicities,
chronic
biomarkers
will
be
focus
update
understanding
irAEs.Expert
opinion
are
major
limitation
deployment
multi-agent
regimens
thus
priority
to
understand,
treat,
prevent.
Recent
developments
led
greater
these
events,
which
may
lead
improved
prevention
mitigation
strategies.
Further,
studies
also
suggested
steroid-sparing
approaches
that
useful.
Ultimately,
preventing
managing
irAEs
key
goal
toward
successful
across
broader
range
patients
cancer.
Frontiers in Pharmacology,
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
14
Published: June 2, 2023
Introduction:
Cutaneous
adverse
events
are
commonly
reported
immune-related
(irAEs),
some
of
which
serious
or
even
life-threatening,
and
it
is
essential
to
study
these
specific
cutaneous
AEs
understand
their
characteristics
risk.
Methods:
We
performed
a
meta-analysis
published
clinical
trials
for
immune
checkpoint
inhibitors
(ICIs)
evaluate
the
incidence
events,
using
data
from
PubMed,
Embase,
Cochrane
Library
databases.
Results:
A
total
232
with
45,472
patients
were
involved.
Results
showed
that
anti-PD-1
targeted
therapy
combinations
associated
higher
risk
most
selected
events.
In
addition,
retrospective
pharmacovigilance
was
conducted
Food
Drug
Administration
(FDA)
Adverse
Events
System
database.
Reporting
odds
ratio
(ROR)
Bayesian
information
components
(IC)
used
perform
disproportionality
analysis.
Cases
extracted
January
2011
September
2020.
identified
381
(20.24%)
maculopapular
rash,
213
(11.32%)
vitiligo,
215
(11.42%)
Stevens-Johnson
syndrome
(SJS),
165
(8.77%)
toxic
epidermal
necrolysis
(TEN)
cases.
For
anti-PD-1/L1
combined
anti-CTLA-4
strongest
signal
(ROR:
55.89;
95%
CI:
42.34-73.78;
IC025:
4.73).
Palmar-plantar
erythrodysesthesia
(PPE)
significant
association
VEGF
(R)-TKIs
18.67;
14.77-23.60;
3.67).
SJS/TEN,
antiPD-1
3.07;
2.68-3.52;
1.39).
The
median
onset
time
vitiligo
SJS/TEN
83
24
days,
respectively.
Conclusion:
Overall,
in
AEs,
each
them
characteristics.
It
necessary
realize
differences
take
appropriate
interventions
different
regimens.