COVID-19 in pregnant women: a systematic review and meta-analysis on the risk and prevalence of pregnancy loss
Janneke A C van Baar,
No information about this author
Elena Kostova,
No information about this author
John Allotey
No information about this author
et al.
Human Reproduction Update,
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
30(2), P. 133 - 152
Published: Nov. 28, 2023
Abstract
BACKGROUND
Pregnant
women
infected
with
severe
acute
respiratory
syndrome
coronavirus
2
(SARS-CoV-2)
are
more
likely
to
experience
preterm
birth
and
their
neonates
be
stillborn
or
admitted
a
neonatal
unit.
The
World
Health
Organization
declared
in
May
2023
an
end
the
disease
2019
(COVID-19)
pandemic
as
global
health
emergency.
However,
pregnant
still
becoming
SARS-CoV-2
there
is
limited
information
available
regarding
effect
of
infection
early
pregnancy
on
outcomes.
OBJECTIVE
AND
RATIONALE
We
conducted
this
systematic
review
determine
prevalence
loss
SARS-Cov-2
compare
risk
without
infection.
SEARCH
METHODS
Our
based
prospectively
registered
protocol.
search
PregCov19
consortium
was
supplemented
extra
electronic
specifically
up
10
March
PubMed,
Google
Scholar,
LitCovid.
included
retrospective
prospective
studies
infection,
provided
that
they
contained
losses
first
and/or
second
trimester.
Primary
outcome
miscarriage
defined
before
20
weeks
gestation,
however,
reported
22
24
were
also
included.
Additionally,
we
report
occur
at
trimester
specifying
gestational
age,
for
only
when
study
presented
stillbirths
foetal
separately
from
miscarriages.
Data
stratified
into
Secondary
outcomes
ectopic
(any
extra-uterine
pregnancy),
termination
pregnancy.
At
least
three
researchers
independently
extracted
data
assessed
quality.
calculated
odds
ratios
(OR)
differences
(RDs)
corresponding
95%
CI
pooled
using
random
effects
meta-analysis.
To
estimate
prevalence,
performed
meta-analysis
proportions.
Heterogeneity
by
I2.
OUTCOMES
120
comprising
total
168
444
infection;
which
18
233
Evidence
level
considered
low
moderate
certainty,
mostly
owing
selection
bias.
did
not
find
evidence
association
between
(OR
1.10,
0.81–1.48;
I2
=
0.0%;
RD
0.0012,
−0.0103
0.0127;
0%;
9
studies,
4439
women).
Miscarriage
occurred
9.9%
(95%
6.2–14.0%;
68%;
46
1797
women)
SARS
CoV-2
1.2%
0.3–2.4%;
34%;
33
studies;
3159
proportion
pregnancies
1.4%
0.02–4.2%;
66%;
14
950
Termination
0.6%
0.01–1.6%;
79%;
39
1166
WIDER
IMPLICATIONS
found
no
indication
increases
provide
better
estimates,
well-designed
needed
include
conception
consider
clinical
manifestation
severity
loss,
well
potential
confounding
factors
such
previous
loss.
For
practice,
should
advised
take
precautions
avoid
exposure
receive
vaccination.
Language: Английский
COVID-19 Pandemic Impact on the Maternal Mortality in Kazakhstan and Comparison with the Countries in Central Asia
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health,
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
20(3), P. 2184 - 2184
Published: Jan. 25, 2023
Maternal
mortality
ratio
is
one
of
the
sensitive
indicators
that
can
characterize
performance
healthcare
systems.
In
our
study
we
aimed
to
compare
maternal
in
Central
Asia
region
from
2000
2020,
determine
its
trends
and
evaluate
association
between
countries’
total
health
expenditures.
We
also
compared
causes
before
during
pandemic
Kazakhstan.
The
data
were
derived
public
statistical
collections
each
Asian
country.
During
pre-pandemic
period,
nations
had
a
downward
trend
mortality.
countries
decreased
by
38%
47.3
per
100,000
live
births
29.5
2020.
Except
for
Uzbekistan,
where
this
indicator
decreased,
all
experienced
sharp
increase
proportion
indirect
deaths
Kazakhstan
reached
76.3%
There
an
their
expenditures
expressed
national
currency
units
(r
max
=
−0.89
min
−0.66,
p
<
0.01).
revealed
issue
availability
accessibility
research
region.
findings
suggest
there
must
be
additional
efforts
local
authorities
enhance
preparedness
systems
new
challenges
improve
accessibility.
Language: Английский
Gestational weight gain during pregnancy is the risk factor for Omicron infection: a retrospective case–control study
Lin Yao,
No information about this author
Peizhen Zhang,
No information about this author
Jin Zhou
No information about this author
et al.
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
24(1)
Published: Dec. 18, 2024
It
remains
unclear
whether
gestational
weight
gain
(GWG)
during
pregnancy
is
associated
with
Omicron
infection
in
pregnant
women.
To
investigate
an
increased
risk
of
infection.
This
a
retrospective
case-control
study
women
from
The
Third
Affiliated
Hospital
Sun
Yat-sen
University
December
1
to
31,
2022.
Pregnant
infected
were
compared
those
uninfected
using
chi-square
statistics
for
categorical
variables
and
t-tests
or
ANOVA
continuous
variables.
Multivariable
logistic
regression,
along
subgroup
analyses,
was
used
the
association
between
Our
included
369
who
met
eligibility
criteria.
proportion
term,
113(30.6%)
256(69.4%).
Classified
according
GWG
pregnancy,
above
IOM
significantly
(P
=
0.006).
After
adjusting
demographic
factors
complications,
this
particularly
notable
(OR
2.55,
95%CI
1.35-4.85,
P
0.004).
pregestational
BMI,
normal-weight
women,
0.01).
2.56,
1.24-5.31,
Among
normal
weight,
independent
factor
Language: Английский