Impacts
of
development
projects
on
ecosystems
high
biodiversity
value
should
be
assessed
by
applying
the
mitigation
hierarchy,
whose
last
stage
is
offsetting.This
research
developed
a
framework
for
planning
and
evaluating
measures
to
offset
losses
ecosystem
services,
based
principles
criteria
aligned
with
international
best
practice
recommendations.The
equivalence,
additionality
permanence
were
applied
evaluate
offsets
used
in
an
iron
ore
mining
project
called
Minas-Rio,
located
Southeastern
Brazil.Based
document
review
spatial
analysis,
including
use
landscape
metrics,
it
was
found
that
implementation
caused
loss
1,605.25
hectares
forests
332
grasslands;
79
caves,
which
resulted
3,269.98
offsets,
45.4%
restoration
54.6%
protection
areas
already
had
or
grasslands.It
if
carefully
planned,
have
potential
balance
result
net
positive
impact.However,
part
gains
are
only
consolidated
after
long
time
span,
lag
between
gains.The
metrics
assess
compensation
measuresindex
largest
fragment
core
area
(edge
effect)
-showed
connectivity
forest
fragments
increased
as
location
areas.The
analysis
scenario
30
years
indicates
promote
increasing
functional
connectivity.
strategies
ensure
-essentially
creation
private
protected
management
these
-,
financial
guarantees
cover
maintenance
costs
mine
closure
lacking.In
terms
offsetting
impacts
both
other
assessed,
concluding
dedicated
impactsparticularly
water
-has
can
certain
those
integrated
offsets.However,
specific
targeted
at
services
needed.Actions
such
conducting
ex-ante
integrating
mitigate
social
stakeholder
engagement
needed
simultaneously
services.Achieving
impact
process
requires
sustained
efforts
demonstrable
over
term.It
therefore
necessary
periodically
results
actions,
sound
theoretical
design
well-structured
monitoring
programmes.
Research Square (Research Square),
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
unknown
Published: Aug. 9, 2023
Abstract
Mitigation
banking
is
part
of
the
ever-expanding
global
environmental
market
framework
that
aims
to
balance
negative
approved
anthropogenic
impacts
versus
third-party
provided
ecosystem
benefits,
sold
in
form
credits.
Given
need
conserve
freshwater
biodiversity
and
habitat,
has
received
great
traction
systems.
While
extensive
reviews
studies
have
been
conducted
on
evaluating
if
equivalency
between
offset
can
be
achieved,
there
almost
no
research
being
done
way
credits
are
generated.
Synthesizing
data
through
cluster
analyses
from
26
banks
United
States
generating
for
species
systems,
we
show
two
dominant
approaches:
removing
barriers
targeting
whole
communities.
Both
address
crucial
conservation
needs
but
come
with
their
risks
caveats.
Using
common
characteristics
management
practices
within
these
groups,
showcase
conclude
credit
generation
via
barrier
removal
at
risk
granting
too
large
an
area,
leading
over-crediting.
Banks
communities
accounting
landscape-level
interactions
influences
potentially
detrimental
individual
level
large-scale
availability
as
well
transfer
incentivize
non-compliance
mitigation
hierarchy.
Research Square (Research Square),
Journal Year:
2022,
Volume and Issue:
unknown
Published: May 9, 2022
Abstract
Conservation
Banking
in
California
is
a
long-established
offset
program.
Banks
are
hybrid
instruments
that
hover
between
market
autonomy
and
regulatory
oversight.
Challenges
may
affect
program
success
include
aligning
regulation
with
the
scales
objectives
of
conservation
interaction
other
compensation
instruments.
I
use
an
analytical
framework
combining
social-ecological
fit
(does
spatial,
functional,
temporal
or
conservation?)
instrument
(are
redundant,
synergetic,
etc.?)
to
analyze
institutional
banking
Results
show
fails
reflect
species
objectives,
creating
mismatch.
The
disincentivizes
banking,
while
its
conserving
cannot
be
measured.
Competing
redundant
can
lead
weaker
compensation.
needs
equal
standards
for
all
Findings
on
useful
programs,
considerations
could
improve
offsets
anywhere.
Impacts
of
development
projects
on
ecosystems
high
biodiversity
value
should
be
assessed
by
applying
the
mitigation
hierarchy,
whose
last
stage
is
offsetting.This
research
developed
a
framework
for
planning
and
evaluating
measures
to
offset
losses
ecosystem
services,
based
principles
criteria
aligned
with
international
best
practice
recommendations.The
equivalence,
additionality
permanence
were
applied
evaluate
offsets
used
in
an
iron
ore
mining
project
called
Minas-Rio,
located
Southeastern
Brazil.Based
document
review
spatial
analysis,
including
use
landscape
metrics,
it
was
found
that
implementation
caused
loss
1,605.25
hectares
forests
332
grasslands;
79
caves,
which
resulted
3,269.98
offsets,
45.4%
restoration
54.6%
protection
areas
already
had
or
grasslands.It
if
carefully
planned,
have
potential
balance
result
net
positive
impact.However,
part
gains
are
only
consolidated
after
long
time
span,
lag
between
gains.The
metrics
assess
compensation
measuresindex
largest
fragment
core
area
(edge
effect)
-showed
connectivity
forest
fragments
increased
as
location
areas.The
analysis
scenario
30
years
indicates
promote
increasing
functional
connectivity.
strategies
ensure
-essentially
creation
private
protected
management
these
-,
financial
guarantees
cover
maintenance
costs
mine
closure
lacking.In
terms
offsetting
impacts
both
other
assessed,
concluding
dedicated
impactsparticularly
water
-has
can
certain
those
integrated
offsets.However,
specific
targeted
at
services
needed.Actions
such
conducting
ex-ante
integrating
mitigate
social
stakeholder
engagement
needed
simultaneously
services.Achieving
impact
process
requires
sustained
efforts
demonstrable
over
term.It
therefore
necessary
periodically
results
actions,
sound
theoretical
design
well-structured
monitoring
programmes.