Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, Journal Year: 2023, Volume and Issue: 127, P. 107356 - 107356
Published: Nov. 9, 2023
Language: Английский
Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, Journal Year: 2023, Volume and Issue: 127, P. 107356 - 107356
Published: Nov. 9, 2023
Language: Английский
Materials, Journal Year: 2022, Volume and Issue: 15(12), P. 4164 - 4164
Published: June 12, 2022
Several types of research currently use machine learning (ML) methods to estimate the mechanical characteristics concrete. This study aimed compare capacities four ML methods: eXtreme gradient boosting (XG Boost), (GB), Cat (CB), and extra trees regressor (ETR), predict splitting tensile strength 28-day-old self-compacting concrete (SCC) made from recycled aggregates (RA), using data obtained literature. A database 381 samples literature published in scientific journals was used develop models. The were randomly divided into three sets: training, validation, test, with each having 267 (70%), 57 (15%), (15%) samples, respectively. coefficient determination (R2), root mean square error (RMSE), absolute (MAE) metrics evaluate For training set, results showed that all models could SCC RA because R2 values for model had significance higher than 0.75. XG Boost best performance, showing highest value = 0.8423, as well lowest RMSE (=0.0581) MAE (=0.0443), when compared GB, CB, ETR Therefore, considered predicting RA. Sensitivity analysis revealed variable contributing most split this material after 28 days cement.
Language: Английский
Citations
44Building and Environment, Journal Year: 2022, Volume and Issue: 226, P. 109735 - 109735
Published: Oct. 28, 2022
Language: Английский
Citations
42Energy and Buildings, Journal Year: 2023, Volume and Issue: 283, P. 112807 - 112807
Published: Jan. 20, 2023
Language: Английский
Citations
41Journal of Materials Research and Technology, Journal Year: 2023, Volume and Issue: 24, P. 6348 - 6368
Published: April 27, 2023
The significant requirement for natural resources, specifically as ingredients of cement, is accelerating due to the considerable growth construction sector. Further, cement production adversely affects climate change generation bulk CO2 emissions. At same time, a quantum ceramic waste generated either in process or demolition products each year. unavailability an adequate way dispose this negatively impacts environment and landfills. Numerous researchers have explored potential utilizing powder partial replacement reduce allied issues. Hence, current study, supervised machine learning (ML) algorithms, i.e., Decision Tree (DT), AdaBoost (AdB), Bagging (Bg), Random Forest (RF), Gradient Boosting (GB) XGBoost (XGB) are employed predicting Compressive Strength (CS) concrete (CWPC). performance models also assessed by using coefficient determination (R2), Mean Absolute Error (MAE), Root Square (RMSE), Nash Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE). k-fold cross-validation technique applied afterwards validate model's performance. For CS CWPC, RF algorithm most effective among with higher R2 value 0.97 significantly lesser RMSE MAE values 1.40 1.13, respectively. SHAP analysis shows that curing days feature has highest influence on CWPC. As per quantitative Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA), 10% CWP content can 6.78%, 8.68%, 7.18%, 7.19% reduced change, ecosystem quality, human health, Moreover, effects non-renewable energy depletion ozone layer, global warming primarily be maximum 7%, 6%, 9%, application ML techniques estimating CWPC would benefit field civil engineering terms conserving effort, time.
Language: Английский
Citations
40Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, Journal Year: 2023, Volume and Issue: 127, P. 107356 - 107356
Published: Nov. 9, 2023
Language: Английский
Citations
40