World Development,
Journal Year:
2022,
Volume and Issue:
158, P. 106014 - 106014
Published: July 4, 2022
Restoring
degraded
landscapes
is
critical
for
achieving
global
environmental
and
development
goals,
agroforestry
increasingly
promoted
as
a
nature-based
solution
to
land
degradation.
Farmer-managed
natural
regeneration
(FMNR)
an
agroforestry-based
approach
restoring
agricultural
it
has
been
widely
implemented
in
African
drylands.
However,
recent
systematic
review
found
significant
gaps
the
evidence
base
FMNR,
including
that
its
upscaling
based
on
inadequate
understandings
of
local
contexts.
Furthermore,
studies
reporting
farmer
adoption
FMNR
have
mainly
relied
quantitative
data
from
household
surveys,
resulting
limited
what
motivates
farmers
who
practice
FMNR.
This
paper
draws
results
qualitative
study
northeastern
Ghana
address
two
questions:
1)
How
why
do
FMNR?
And
2)
does
context
influence
farmers'
rationales
practicing
We
grounded
their
perspectives
utility
nuanced
farming
tree
tenure
systems.
The
our
also
demonstrate
how
decision-making
was
situated
within
socially
agroecologically
differentiated
contexts,
which
were
conditioned
by
long-term,
multi-faceted
change
region.
conclude
spite
rush
scale
up
more
attention
should
be
directed
assessing
where,
when,
whom
might
appropriate.
Such
assessments
resource
managers'
preferences,
systems,
requisite
biophysical
conditions
To
support
these
efforts,
we
propose
suitability
assessment
framework,
findings
those
related
studies.
As
landscape
restoration
scaled
globally,
initiatives
informed
demonstrating
managers
activity
well
influences
choices.
Journal of Ethnobiology,
Journal Year:
2021,
Volume and Issue:
41(2), P. 144 - 169
Published: July 1, 2021
The
knowledge
systems
and
practices
of
Indigenous
Peoples
local
communities
play
critical
roles
in
safeguarding
the
biological
cultural
diversity
our
planet.
Globalization,
government
policies,
capitalism,
colonialism,
other
rapid
social-ecological
changes
threaten
relationships
between
their
environments,
thereby
challenging
continuity
dynamism
Local
Knowledge
(ILK).
In
this
article,
we
contribute
to
“World
Scientists'
Warning
Humanity,”
issued
by
Alliance
World
Scientists,
exploring
opportunities
for
sustaining
ILK
on
behalf
future
stewardship
Our
warning
raises
alarm
about
pervasive
ubiquitous
erosion
practice
social
ecological
consequences
erosion.
While
can
be
adaptable
resilient,
foundations
these
are
compromised
ongoing
suppression,
misrepresentation,
appropriation,
assimilation,
disconnection,
destruction
biocultural
heritage.
Three
case
studies
illustrate
processes
how
protecting
is
central
conservation.
We
conclude
with
15
recommendations
that
call
recognition
support
systems.
Enacting
will
entail
a
transformative
sustained
shift
systems,
holders,
multiple
expressions
lands
waters
recognized,
affirmed,
valued.
appeal
urgent
action
efforts
around
world
maintain
languages,
rights,
ties
waters,
integrity
territories—on
which
all
depend.
Communications Biology,
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
6(1)
Published: April 7, 2023
Abstract
Social-ecological
ecosystem
restoration
involves
interacting
challenges,
including
climate
change,
resource
overexploitation
and
political
instability.
To
prepare
for
these
other
emerging
threats,
we
synthesized
key
social-ecological
systems
literature
derived
three
guiding
themes
that
can
help
to
enhance
the
adaptive
capacity
of
sites:
(i)
work
with
existing
system,
(ii)
create
self-sustaining,
systems,
(iii)
foster
diversity
participation.
We
propose
a
two-step
approach
provide
an
example
from
Rwanda
detailing
application
principles.
While
site-specific
activities
have
be
designed
implemented
by
local
practitioners,
our
synthesis
guide
forward-thinking
practice.
Forests,
Journal Year:
2020,
Volume and Issue:
11(6), P. 706 - 706
Published: June 24, 2020
Existing
guidelines
and
best-practices
documents
do
not
satisfy,
at
present,
the
need
for
guiding
implementation
of
Forest
Landscape
Restoration
(FLR)
based
on
core
principles.
Given
wide
range
FLR
practices
varied
spectrum
actors
involved,
a
single
working
framework
is
unlikely
to
be
effective,
but
tailored
frameworks
can
co-created
common
conceptual
(i.e.,
set
principles
generalized
criteria
indicators).
We
present
background
regarding
concepts,
definitions,
principles,
discuss
challenges
that
confront
effective
long-term
FLR.
enumerate
many
benefits
transformative
indicators
bring
different
sectors
involved
in
restoration
when
such
anchored
justify
co-develop
apply
specifically
help
ensure
interventions
social,
economic,
environmental
multiple
stakeholders
within
landscapes
adjust
changing
conditions
over
time.
Several
examples
are
presented
illustrate
goals
needs
communities,
donors
investors,
government
agencies.
Transparency,
feedback,
communication,
assessment,
adaptive
management
important
components
all
frameworks.
Finally,
we
describe
existing
what
learn
from
them.
Working
developed
used
by
who
seek
initiate
an
process
align
actions
scales
levels.
Land,
Journal Year:
2020,
Volume and Issue:
9(8), P. 251 - 251
Published: July 29, 2020
Restoration
depends
on
purpose
and
context.
At
the
core
it
entails
innovation
to
halt
ongoing
reverse
past
degradation.
It
aims
for
increased
functionality,
not
necessarily
recovering
system
states.
Location-specific
interventions
in
social-ecological
systems
reducing
proximate
pressures,
need
synergize
with
transforming
generic
drivers
of
unsustainable
land
use.
After
reviewing
pantropical
international
research
forests,
trees,
agroforestry,
we
developed
an
options-by-context
typology.
Four
intensities
restoration
interact:
R.I.
Ecological
intensification
within
a
use
system,
R.II.
Recovery/regeneration,
local
R.III.
Reparation/recuperation,
requiring
national
policy
context,
R.IV.
Remediation,
support
investment.
Relevant
start
from
values
human
identity
while
addressing
five
potential
bottlenecks:
Rights,
Know-how,
Markets
(inputs,
outputs,
credit),
Local
Ecosystem
Services
(including
water,
agrobiodiversity,
micro/mesoclimate)
Teleconnections
(global
climate
change,
biodiversity).
Six
stages
forest
transition
(from
closed
old-growth
open-field
agriculture
re-treed
(peri)urban
landscapes)
can
contextualize
interventions,
six
special
places:
water
towers,
riparian
zone
wetlands,
peat
landscapes,
small
islands
mangroves,
transport
infrastructure,
mining
scars.
The
typology
help
link
knowledge
action
people-centric
which
external
stakeholders
coinvest,
reflecting
shared
responsibility
historical
degradation
benefits
environmental
stewardship.
Forests,
Journal Year:
2020,
Volume and Issue:
11(8), P. 820 - 820
Published: July 28, 2020
Forest
and
landscape
restoration
(FLR)
is
being
carried
out
across
the
world
to
meet
ambitious
global
goals.
However,
scale
of
these
efforts
combined
with
timeframe
in
which
they
are
supposed
take
place
may
compromise
quality
restoration,
thus
limit
persistence
on
landscape.
This
paper
presents
a
synthesis
ten
case
studies
identified
as
FLR
critically
analyse
implemented
initiatives,
their
outcomes,
main
challenges,
an
eye
improving
future
efforts.
The
projects
diverse
terms
spatial
coverage,
objectives;
types
interventions;
initial
socioeconomic,
institutional,
environmental
conditions.
six
principles
FLR—which
have
been
widely
adopted
theory
by
large
organisations—are
inadequately
addressed
initiatives
presented
here.
project
or
interventions,
although
expected
offer
benefits,
face
many
challenges
including
lack
long-term
sustainability
limited
uptake
regional
national
agencies,
monitoring,
reporting
learning,
poor
governance
structures,
technical
barriers,
mainly
owing
institutional
weaknesses.
On
basis
cases,
we
propose
that
best
pathway
achieving
via
incremental
process
smaller
number
more
achievable
objectives
set
over
time,
rather
than
setting
highly
targets
implementers
struggle
achieve.
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences,
Journal Year:
2022,
Volume and Issue:
378(1867)
Published: Nov. 14, 2022
Forest
restoration
has
been
proposed
as
a
scalable
nature-based
solution
to
achieve
global
environmental
and
socio-economic
outcomes
is
central
many
policy
initiatives,
such
the
Bonn
Challenge.
Restored
forests
contain
appreciable
biodiversity,
improve
habitat
connectivity
sequester
carbon.
Incentive
mechanisms
(e.g.
payments
for
ecosystem
services
allocation
of
management
rights)
have
focus
forest
efforts
decades.
Yet,
there
still
little
understanding
their
role
in
promoting
success.
We
conducted
systematic
literature
review
investigate
how
incentive
are
used
promote
restoration,
outcomes,
biophysical
factors
that
influence
implementation
program
found
factors,
governance,
monitoring
systems
experience
beliefs
participants,
dominate
whether
or
not
an
mechanism
successful.
approximately
half
studies
report
both
positive
ecological
outcomes.
However,
reported
adverse
were
more
commonly
than
ecological.
Our
results
reveal
achieving
at
sufficient
scale
meet
international
commitments
will
require
stronger
assessment
enable
constrain
success
mechanisms.
This
article
part
theme
issue
‘Understanding
landscape
restoration:
reinforcing
scientific
foundations
UN
Decade
on
Ecosystem
Restoration’.
Frontiers in Forests and Global Change,
Journal Year:
2022,
Volume and Issue:
5
Published: Oct. 6, 2022
The
government
of
Ethiopia
has
made
an
ambitious
plan
building
a
carbon-neutral
and
middle-income
economy
by
2030.
In
2016,
the
country
pledged
to
restore
15
million
hectares
degraded
landscapes
as
part
African
Forest
Landscape
Restoration
Initiative
(AFR
100).
A
total
three
major
forest
landscape
restoration
(FLR)
initiatives
have
been
used
achieve
this
target:
participatory
management
(PFM)
engage
communities
in
sustainably
managing
natural
forests;
area
enclosures/exclosures
(AEs)
socially
fence
hillsides
communal
lands
allow
these
areas
regain
their
productive
potential;
sustainable
land
program
Green
Legacy
(SLM-GLI)
that
aim
at
conserving
soil
water
resources
planting
seedlings
increase
cover.
After
describing
FLR
initiatives,
study
evaluated
impacts
on
use
cover
change
over
time
assessed
them
against
six
principles
selecting
nationally
relevant
criteria
under
each
principle.
results
showed
were
rated
rather
low
terms
focusing
for
multiple
benefits,
participation
benefits
stakeholders,
ownership
rights,
employing
approaches
tailored
local
context,
adaptively
long-term
resilience.
Concerning
impacts,
varying
trends
observed
different
areas,
periods,
types.
Recognizing
mitigating
limitations
together
with
addressing
site-specific
drivers
will
improve
conservation
livelihood
outcomes
Ethiopia.
It
is
hoped
findings
inform
practitioners
other
countries
practical
assessing
initiatives.
Nature Climate Change,
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
13(12), P. 1340 - 1347
Published: Nov. 23, 2023
Abstract
Forest
landscape
restoration
has
emerged
as
a
key
strategy
to
sequester
atmospheric
carbon
and
conserve
biodiversity
while
providing
livelihood
co-benefits
for
indigenous
peoples
local
communities.
Using
dataset
of
314
forest
commons
in
human-dominated
landscapes
15
tropical
countries
Africa,
Asia
Latin
America,
we
examine
the
relationships
among
sequestered
above-ground
woody
biomass,
tree
species
richness
livelihoods.
We
find
five
distinct
clusters
commons,
with
trade-offs
on
multiple
dimensions.
The
presence
formal
community
management
association
participation
rule-making
are
consistent
predictors
positive
outcomes.
These
findings,
drawn
from
range
contexts
globally,
suggest
that
empowered
governance
may
support
objectives
restoration.
Our
analysis
advances
understanding
institutional
aspects
underscoring
importance
analysing
interconnections
benefits
inform
effective
interventions
multifunctional
forests.