Farmers’ perspectives and context are key for the success and sustainability of farmer-managed natural regeneration (FMNR) in northeastern Ghana DOI Creative Commons
Matt Kandel, Daniela Anghileri, Rahinatu Sidiki Alare

et al.

World Development, Journal Year: 2022, Volume and Issue: 158, P. 106014 - 106014

Published: July 4, 2022

Restoring degraded landscapes is critical for achieving global environmental and development goals, agroforestry increasingly promoted as a nature-based solution to land degradation. Farmer-managed natural regeneration (FMNR) an agroforestry-based approach restoring agricultural it has been widely implemented in African drylands. However, recent systematic review found significant gaps the evidence base FMNR, including that its upscaling based on inadequate understandings of local contexts. Furthermore, studies reporting farmer adoption FMNR have mainly relied quantitative data from household surveys, resulting limited what motivates farmers who practice FMNR. This paper draws results qualitative study northeastern Ghana address two questions: 1) How why do FMNR? And 2) does context influence farmers' rationales practicing We grounded their perspectives utility nuanced farming tree tenure systems. The our also demonstrate how decision-making was situated within socially agroecologically differentiated contexts, which were conditioned by long-term, multi-faceted change region. conclude spite rush scale up more attention should be directed assessing where, when, whom might appropriate. Such assessments resource managers' preferences, systems, requisite biophysical conditions To support these efforts, we propose suitability assessment framework, findings those related studies. As landscape restoration scaled globally, initiatives informed demonstrating managers activity well influences choices.

Language: Английский

Scientists' Warning to Humanity on Threats to Indigenous and Local Knowledge Systems DOI Open Access
Álvaro Fernández‐Llamazares, Dana Lepofsky, Ken Lertzman

et al.

Journal of Ethnobiology, Journal Year: 2021, Volume and Issue: 41(2), P. 144 - 169

Published: July 1, 2021

The knowledge systems and practices of Indigenous Peoples local communities play critical roles in safeguarding the biological cultural diversity our planet. Globalization, government policies, capitalism, colonialism, other rapid social-ecological changes threaten relationships between their environments, thereby challenging continuity dynamism Local Knowledge (ILK). In this article, we contribute to “World Scientists' Warning Humanity,” issued by Alliance World Scientists, exploring opportunities for sustaining ILK on behalf future stewardship Our warning raises alarm about pervasive ubiquitous erosion practice social ecological consequences erosion. While can be adaptable resilient, foundations these are compromised ongoing suppression, misrepresentation, appropriation, assimilation, disconnection, destruction biocultural heritage. Three case studies illustrate processes how protecting is central conservation. We conclude with 15 recommendations that call recognition support systems. Enacting will entail a transformative sustained shift systems, holders, multiple expressions lands waters recognized, affirmed, valued. appeal urgent action efforts around world maintain languages, rights, ties waters, integrity territories—on which all depend.

Language: Английский

Citations

193

Beyond ecology: ecosystem restoration as a process for social-ecological transformation DOI
Anazélia M. Tedesco, Sofía López‐Cubillos, Robin L. Chazdon

et al.

Trends in Ecology & Evolution, Journal Year: 2023, Volume and Issue: 38(7), P. 643 - 653

Published: March 9, 2023

Language: Английский

Citations

80

Future-proofing ecosystem restoration through enhancing adaptive capacity DOI Creative Commons
Marina Frietsch, Jacqueline Loos, Katharina Löhr

et al.

Communications Biology, Journal Year: 2023, Volume and Issue: 6(1)

Published: April 7, 2023

Abstract Social-ecological ecosystem restoration involves interacting challenges, including climate change, resource overexploitation and political instability. To prepare for these other emerging threats, we synthesized key social-ecological systems literature derived three guiding themes that can help to enhance the adaptive capacity of sites: (i) work with existing system, (ii) create self-sustaining, systems, (iii) foster diversity participation. We propose a two-step approach provide an example from Rwanda detailing application principles. While site-specific activities have be designed implemented by local practitioners, our synthesis guide forward-thinking practice.

Language: Английский

Citations

28

Co-Creating Conceptual and Working Frameworks for Implementing Forest and Landscape Restoration Based on Core Principles DOI Open Access
Robin L. Chazdon, Victoria Gutierrez, Pedro H. S. Brancalion

et al.

Forests, Journal Year: 2020, Volume and Issue: 11(6), P. 706 - 706

Published: June 24, 2020

Existing guidelines and best-practices documents do not satisfy, at present, the need for guiding implementation of Forest Landscape Restoration (FLR) based on core principles. Given wide range FLR practices varied spectrum actors involved, a single working framework is unlikely to be effective, but tailored frameworks can co-created common conceptual (i.e., set principles generalized criteria indicators). We present background regarding concepts, definitions, principles, discuss challenges that confront effective long-term FLR. enumerate many benefits transformative indicators bring different sectors involved in restoration when such anchored justify co-develop apply specifically help ensure interventions social, economic, environmental multiple stakeholders within landscapes adjust changing conditions over time. Several examples are presented illustrate goals needs communities, donors investors, government agencies. Transparency, feedback, communication, assessment, adaptive management important components all frameworks. Finally, we describe existing what learn from them. Working developed used by who seek initiate an process align actions scales levels.

Language: Английский

Citations

60

People-Centric Nature-Based Land Restoration through Agroforestry: A Typology DOI Creative Commons
Meine van Noordwijk, Vincent Gitz,

Peter A. Minang

et al.

Land, Journal Year: 2020, Volume and Issue: 9(8), P. 251 - 251

Published: July 29, 2020

Restoration depends on purpose and context. At the core it entails innovation to halt ongoing reverse past degradation. It aims for increased functionality, not necessarily recovering system states. Location-specific interventions in social-ecological systems reducing proximate pressures, need synergize with transforming generic drivers of unsustainable land use. After reviewing pantropical international research forests, trees, agroforestry, we developed an options-by-context typology. Four intensities restoration interact: R.I. Ecological intensification within a use system, R.II. Recovery/regeneration, local R.III. Reparation/recuperation, requiring national policy context, R.IV. Remediation, support investment. Relevant start from values human identity while addressing five potential bottlenecks: Rights, Know-how, Markets (inputs, outputs, credit), Local Ecosystem Services (including water, agrobiodiversity, micro/mesoclimate) Teleconnections (global climate change, biodiversity). Six stages forest transition (from closed old-growth open-field agriculture re-treed (peri)urban landscapes) can contextualize interventions, six special places: water towers, riparian zone wetlands, peat landscapes, small islands mangroves, transport infrastructure, mining scars. The typology help link knowledge action people-centric which external stakeholders coinvest, reflecting shared responsibility historical degradation benefits environmental stewardship.

Language: Английский

Citations

58

Achieving Quality Forest and Landscape Restoration in the Tropics DOI Open Access
Liz Ota, Robin L. Chazdon, John Herbohn

et al.

Forests, Journal Year: 2020, Volume and Issue: 11(8), P. 820 - 820

Published: July 28, 2020

Forest and landscape restoration (FLR) is being carried out across the world to meet ambitious global goals. However, scale of these efforts combined with timeframe in which they are supposed take place may compromise quality restoration, thus limit persistence on landscape. This paper presents a synthesis ten case studies identified as FLR critically analyse implemented initiatives, their outcomes, main challenges, an eye improving future efforts. The projects diverse terms spatial coverage, objectives; types interventions; initial socioeconomic, institutional, environmental conditions. six principles FLR—which have been widely adopted theory by large organisations—are inadequately addressed initiatives presented here. project or interventions, although expected offer benefits, face many challenges including lack long-term sustainability limited uptake regional national agencies, monitoring, reporting learning, poor governance structures, technical barriers, mainly owing institutional weaknesses. On basis cases, we propose that best pathway achieving via incremental process smaller number more achievable objectives set over time, rather than setting highly targets implementers struggle achieve.

Language: Английский

Citations

58

Upscaling tropical restoration to deliver environmental benefits and socially equitable outcomes DOI Creative Commons
David P. Edwards, Gianluca Cerullo, Susan Chomba

et al.

Current Biology, Journal Year: 2021, Volume and Issue: 31(19), P. R1326 - R1341

Published: Oct. 1, 2021

Language: Английский

Citations

51

The role of incentive mechanisms in promoting forest restoration DOI Creative Commons
Anazélia M. Tedesco, Pedro H. S. Brancalion, Michelle Hak Hepburn

et al.

Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences, Journal Year: 2022, Volume and Issue: 378(1867)

Published: Nov. 14, 2022

Forest restoration has been proposed as a scalable nature-based solution to achieve global environmental and socio-economic outcomes is central many policy initiatives, such the Bonn Challenge. Restored forests contain appreciable biodiversity, improve habitat connectivity sequester carbon. Incentive mechanisms (e.g. payments for ecosystem services allocation of management rights) have focus forest efforts decades. Yet, there still little understanding their role in promoting success. We conducted systematic literature review investigate how incentive are used promote restoration, outcomes, biophysical factors that influence implementation program found factors, governance, monitoring systems experience beliefs participants, dominate whether or not an mechanism successful. approximately half studies report both positive ecological outcomes. However, reported adverse were more commonly than ecological. Our results reveal achieving at sufficient scale meet international commitments will require stronger assessment enable constrain success mechanisms. This article part theme issue ‘Understanding landscape restoration: reinforcing scientific foundations UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration’.

Language: Английский

Citations

34

Forest landscape restoration in Ethiopia: Progress and challenges DOI Creative Commons
Habtemariam Kassa, Abrham Abiyu, Niguse Hagazi

et al.

Frontiers in Forests and Global Change, Journal Year: 2022, Volume and Issue: 5

Published: Oct. 6, 2022

The government of Ethiopia has made an ambitious plan building a carbon-neutral and middle-income economy by 2030. In 2016, the country pledged to restore 15 million hectares degraded landscapes as part African Forest Landscape Restoration Initiative (AFR 100). A total three major forest landscape restoration (FLR) initiatives have been used achieve this target: participatory management (PFM) engage communities in sustainably managing natural forests; area enclosures/exclosures (AEs) socially fence hillsides communal lands allow these areas regain their productive potential; sustainable land program Green Legacy (SLM-GLI) that aim at conserving soil water resources planting seedlings increase cover. After describing FLR initiatives, study evaluated impacts on use cover change over time assessed them against six principles selecting nationally relevant criteria under each principle. results showed were rated rather low terms focusing for multiple benefits, participation benefits stakeholders, ownership rights, employing approaches tailored local context, adaptively long-term resilience. Concerning impacts, varying trends observed different areas, periods, types. Recognizing mitigating limitations together with addressing site-specific drivers will improve conservation livelihood outcomes Ethiopia. It is hoped findings inform practitioners other countries practical assessing initiatives.

Language: Английский

Citations

33

Community forest governance and synergies among carbon, biodiversity and livelihoods DOI Creative Commons
Harry W. Fischer, Ashwini Chhatre,

Apurva Duddu

et al.

Nature Climate Change, Journal Year: 2023, Volume and Issue: 13(12), P. 1340 - 1347

Published: Nov. 23, 2023

Abstract Forest landscape restoration has emerged as a key strategy to sequester atmospheric carbon and conserve biodiversity while providing livelihood co-benefits for indigenous peoples local communities. Using dataset of 314 forest commons in human-dominated landscapes 15 tropical countries Africa, Asia Latin America, we examine the relationships among sequestered above-ground woody biomass, tree species richness livelihoods. We find five distinct clusters commons, with trade-offs on multiple dimensions. The presence formal community management association participation rule-making are consistent predictors positive outcomes. These findings, drawn from range contexts globally, suggest that empowered governance may support objectives restoration. Our analysis advances understanding institutional aspects underscoring importance analysing interconnections benefits inform effective interventions multifunctional forests.

Language: Английский

Citations

20