This
paper
assesses
the
French
policy
of
mitigation
hierarchy,
with
aim
no
net
loss
biodiversity,
by
studying
geographical
aspects
application
concept
ecological
offsets
in
equivalence
between
losses
and
gains
using
spatialized
data.
Our
main
finding
reveals
that
majority
are
generated
projects
related
to
transport
infrastructures
(38%)
urban
planning
construction
(23%).
However,
if
there
fewer,
such
as
waste
storage
or
energy
development
mostly
located
natural
preserved
areas,
revealing
a
potential
risk
non
additionnality
offset
measures
private
sector
(through
offsets)
will
gradually
replace
state
protection
biodiversity.
analysis
also
points
out
despite
diversity
projects,
habitats
protected
species
across
France,
is
typical
spatial
layout
profile
offsets,
pleading
for
“one
size
fit
all”
offsetting
context
low
regulators
time,
competence
level
due
weakness
refresh
training
downsizing
public
services
environment.
last
result
argues
stronger
control
from
environmental
agencies
two
tremendously
tricky
concepts
offsetting,
valuation
methods
adjustments
coefficients
(time
delay
risk),
drive
future
decisions
at
local
but
above
all
regional-
national-
documents.
IOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science,
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
1254(1), P. 012017 - 012017
Published: Oct. 1, 2023
Abstract
The
study
is
focused
on
gathering
information
to
monitor
sustainable
land
development
and
biodiversity.
article
discusses
the
objectives
measures
required
achieve
Sustainable
Development
Goal
15
“Protect,
restore
promote
use
of
terrestrial
ecosystems,
sustainably
manage
forests,
combat
desertification,
halt
reverse
degradation
biodiversity
loss”.
This
paper
shows
results
analysis
key
indicators
values
for
Ukraine.
It
also
contains
developed
conceptual
diagram
managing
ecosystems
There
were
identified
main
sources
statistical
information,
including
traditional
enterprise-level
data
big
data,
analyzed
changes
in
monitoring
achievement
Goals
at
micro
level
under
section
“Environmental
area”.
potential
calculating
presented
explored
develop
an
base
monitoring,
evaluating,
policy
related
Further
research
studies
are
needed
determine
algorithms
processing,
modelling
constructing
integrated
indicators.
This
paper
assesses
the
French
policy
of
mitigation
hierarchy,
with
aim
no
net
loss
biodiversity,
by
studying
geographical
aspects
application
concept
ecological
offsets
in
equivalence
between
losses
and
gains
using
spatialized
data.
Our
main
finding
reveals
that
majority
are
generated
projects
related
to
transport
infrastructures
(38%)
urban
planning
construction
(23%).
However,
if
there
fewer,
such
as
waste
storage
or
energy
development
mostly
located
natural
preserved
areas,
revealing
a
potential
risk
non
additionnality
offset
measures
private
sector
(through
offsets)
will
gradually
replace
state
protection
biodiversity.
analysis
also
points
out
despite
diversity
projects,
habitats
protected
species
across
France,
is
typical
spatial
layout
profile
offsets,
pleading
for
“one
size
fit
all”
offsetting
context
low
regulators
time,
competence
level
due
weakness
refresh
training
downsizing
public
services
environment.
last
result
argues
stronger
control
from
environmental
agencies
two
tremendously
tricky
concepts
offsetting,
valuation
methods
adjustments
coefficients
(time
delay
risk),
drive
future
decisions
at
local
but
above
all
regional-
national-
documents.
