Legal and Management Classifications for Estuaries and Coasts DOI
Tim Stojanovic, Suzanne J. Boyes

Elsevier eBooks, Journal Year: 2023, Volume and Issue: unknown, P. 323 - 343

Published: Dec. 22, 2023

Language: Английский

Assessment tool addresses implementation challenges of ecosystem-based management principles in marine spatial planning processes DOI Creative Commons
Ibon Galparsoro, Natalia Montero, Gotzon Mandiola

et al.

Communications Earth & Environment, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: 6(1)

Published: Jan. 28, 2025

Language: Английский

Citations

2

Integrating management of marine activities in Australia DOI Creative Commons
Robert L. Stephenson, Alistair J. Hobday, Ian Butler

et al.

Ocean & Coastal Management, Journal Year: 2023, Volume and Issue: 234, P. 106465 - 106465

Published: Feb. 1, 2023

Language: Английский

Citations

13

Operationalizing a fisheries social-ecological system through a Bayesian belief network reveals hotspots for its adaptive capacity in the southern North sea DOI Creative Commons
Maren Kruse, Jonas Letschert, Roland Cormier

et al.

Journal of Environmental Management, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 357, P. 120685 - 120685

Published: March 28, 2024

Fisheries social-ecological systems (SES) in the North Sea region confront multifaceted challenges stemming from environmental changes, offshore wind farm expansion, and marine protected area establishment. In this paper, we demonstrate utility of a Bayesian Belief Network (BN) approach comprehensively capturing assessing intricate spatial dynamics within German plaice-related fisheries SES. The BN integrates ecological, economic, socio-cultural factors to generate high-resolution maps profitability adaptive capacity potential (ACP) as prospective management targets. Our analysis future scenarios, delineating changes constraints, economics, aspects, identifies that will exert significant influence on SES near future. These include loss fishing grounds due installation farms areas, well reduced plaice landings climate change. identified ACP hotspots hold guide development localized strategies sustainable planning efforts by highlighting consequences decisions. findings emphasize need consider detailed (MSP) illustrate how information may assist decision-makers practitioners prioritization. We, therefore, propose adopting concept broader integrated approaches foster inherently dynamic rapidly evolving environment.

Language: Английский

Citations

5

Accelerating marine spatial planning in the Western Pacific region: Current status and future directions DOI

Chen Ma,

Jinxia Zhao,

Yue Qiao

et al.

Ocean & Coastal Management, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: 262, P. 107552 - 107552

Published: Feb. 13, 2025

Language: Английский

Citations

0

Navigating trade-offs on conservation: the use of participatory mapping in maritime spatial planning DOI Creative Commons
Helena Calado, Débora Gutierrez,

Albane De Bruyn

et al.

npj Ocean Sustainability, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: 4(1)

Published: March 6, 2025

Language: Английский

Citations

0

Policy implications for offshore renewable energy in Australia: An MSP approach supporting the energy transition DOI Creative Commons
Laura Griffiths, Camille Goodman, Michelle Voyer

et al.

Energy Policy, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: 202, P. 114621 - 114621

Published: April 2, 2025

Language: Английский

Citations

0

Economics in Marine Spatial Planning: A Review of Issues in British Columbia and Similar Jurisdictions DOI Open Access
Ibrahim Issifu, Ilyass Dahmouni, Iria García–Lorenzo

et al.

Sustainability, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 16(3), P. 1210 - 1210

Published: Jan. 31, 2024

Recently, there has been a rapid increase in the use of Marine Spatial Planning (MSP) worldwide, partly due to continued loss marine biodiversity and habitat. The sustainability resources is threatened all regions world by major events such as climate change, pollution, overfishing, well illegal, unreported unregulated fishing both on high seas country waters. Here, we present comprehensive review analysis how economic information applied used inform decisions about MSP British Columbia (BC), Canada, other similar jurisdictions around world. This focus for paper was selected because important gaps remain literature terms incorporating questions into MSP. We first different definitions MSP, then extract useful lessons from regimes with well-tested decision support tools (DSTs) this guide implementation BC. Finally, discuss case studies Australia, South Africa, Belgium. Our suggests that applying design MSPs would lead better decisions. turn foster livelihoods, attract finance, buy-in, advance United Nations Sustainable Development Goal 14: Life Below Water, thereby achieving Infinity Fish, i.e., ensuring ocean benefits flow humanity forever.

Language: Английский

Citations

3

Exploring the potential of theory-based evaluation to strengthen marine spatial planning practice DOI Creative Commons
Rachel Zuercher, Nicole Motzer, Natalie C. Ban

et al.

Ocean & Coastal Management, Journal Year: 2023, Volume and Issue: 239, P. 106594 - 106594

Published: April 10, 2023

Language: Английский

Citations

8

Site selection within the maritime spatial planning: Insights from use-cases on aquaculture, offshore wind energy and aggregates extraction DOI Creative Commons

Andrej Abramic,

Alejandro García Mendoza,

Víctor Cordero-Penín

et al.

Ocean & Coastal Management, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 251, P. 107051 - 107051

Published: March 12, 2024

Maritime Spatial Planning (MSP) has received increasing attention from policy-makers around the world as an ecosystem-based approach to waters under jurisdiction of coastal states, with aim enhancing socio-economic development while promoting environmental protection and conservation. However, this planning process requires abundant diverse types data information that are not easily operationalised in a spatially efficient manner for MSP. Aiming overcome barrier, present study proposes suitability zoning methodology based on ad hoc developed decision support system (i.e. INDIMAR) capable integrating required spatial collected structured proposed framework organised five key components: sensitivity, marine conservation, natural oceanographic potential, land-sea interactions, operational maritime uses activities. This was tested individual activities different Atlantic outermost regions, configuring use cases: aquaculture Canary Islands, offshore wind farms Madeira archipelago aggregate extraction Azores. The resulted flexible model identifies most suitable sites sustainable activities, taking into account potential compatibility nature mitigating impacts minimising conflicts other it's important note results strongly influenced by availability quality data, identifying main gaps each region recommended be filled view formal processes In essence, underlines broad applicability framework, which can adapted implemented regions after due consideration several aspects such as: availability, contextual differences, legal governance frameworks, institutional capacity interactions. By these account, resulting provide valuable insights, thereby effectiveness MSP efforts.

Language: Английский

Citations

2

Who Is in and Who Is out in Ocean Economies Development? DOI Open Access
Marianna Cavallo, Alicia Said, José A. Pérez Agúndez

et al.

Sustainability, Journal Year: 2023, Volume and Issue: 15(4), P. 3253 - 3253

Published: Feb. 10, 2023

This review engages with the ongoing blue economy debate to decipher old and emerging forms of economic, institutional, physical social exclusions local communities vulnerable societies that may result from development ocean projects policies across globe. The results this scientific policy show that, whereas for some traditional maritime activities such as fisheries, drivers exclusion are well studied somehow addressed in policies, other sectors, energies or deep-sea mining, there is a lack understanding on how recognise prevent different exclusion. Exclusion likely occur when decisions taken at highest level governance achieve national international targets economic growth, food safety, clean energy leisure, little consideration effects environmental contexts. On hand, principles inclusiveness given due consideration, they prove be beneficial societies’ well-being, increasing chance long-term acceptability. We conclude embrace inclusiveness, both governments industries have (a) go beyond capitalist commodification nature benefits than ones, namely, emotional, cultural spiritual; (b) promote initiatives fulfil needs first place adapted contexts; (c) cooperate institutions stakeholders co-management resources adaptive development. Likewise, research institutions, funding organisations governmental agencies engage new ways assess quantitative approach seek integrate qualitative information, knowledge perceptions.

Language: Английский

Citations

6