The Ecological Risks of Heavy Metals in the Estuarine Wetland Ecosystem and Their Impacts on Human Health: A Case from Yellow River Delta National Nature Reserve, China
Land,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
14(4), P. 845 - 845
Published: April 12, 2025
Nature
reserves
are
integral
to
sustaining
ecological
balance,
functioning
like
a
precise
regulator,
where
various
species
depend
on
and
constrain
one
another
collectively
form
stable
ecosystem.
Nevertheless,
in
the
wake
of
economic
development,
pollutants
heavy
metal
contamination
have
insidiously
emerged,
imperceptibly
influencing
all
these
processes.
To
understand
risk
metals
an
estuarine
nature
reserve,
this
study
focused
Yellow
River
Delta
Reserve
(YRDNNR)
analyzed
distribution,
potential
environmental
risks,
possible
sources
(Mn,
Cu,
Zn,
Cr,
As,
Cd,
Pb)
surface
sediments
region.
The
results
indicated
that
YRDNNR
was
rich
As
with
Cd
presenting
most
substantial
risk.
Further
analysis
suggested
high
levels
could
be
ascribed
agricultural
activities.
This
also
found
practices
made
significant
contribution
carcinogenic
pose
certain
risks
natural
environment
human
health.
More
in-depth
monitoring
testing
should
carried
out,
measures
adopted
accordance
their
development.
Moreover,
systematic
regulation
fertilizer
pesticide
use,
along
enhancements
farmers’
awareness,
is
great
significance
alleviating
pollution
hazards.
findings
carry
implications
for
conservation
coastal
wetlands,
serving
as
critical
alert
proliferation
other
areas
delta.
Language: Английский
Analysis of Heavy Metal Sources in Xutuan Mining Area Based on APCS-MLR and PMF Model
Jieyu Xia,
No information about this author
Liangmin Gao,
No information about this author
Jinxiang Yang
No information about this author
et al.
Applied Sciences,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
15(8), P. 4249 - 4249
Published: April 11, 2025
The
present
study
aims
to
determine
the
concentrations
and
forms
of
Copper
(Cu),
Lead
(Pb),
Zinc
(Zn),
Chromium
(Cr),
Cadmium
(Cd),
Arsenic
(As)
in
water
sediments
Xutuan
mining
area.
geoaccumulation
index
(Igeo)
ecological
risk
assessment
coding
(RAC)
methods
were
used
assess
heavy
metal
pollution
levels
risks
sediments.
positive
matrix
factorization
(PMF)
model
absolute
principal
component
score-multiple
linear
regression
(APCS-MLR)
quantitatively
analyze
sources
metals
evaluated
results
showed
good
quality
Cu,
Cr,
Zn,
As
mainly
residual
form,
while
Cd
Pb
organic
matter
combined
form.
Igeo
RAC
that
degree
higher
APCS-MLR
PMF
models
analyzed
contributions
natural
(72.5%
25.1%)
anthropogenic
sources,
respectively,
further
distinguished
coal
(26.4%),
agricultural
(21.44%),
traffic
(27.05%)
sources.
Language: Английский
Spatial Distribution, Source Identification, and Risk Assessment of Heavy Metals in Sediments of the Yellow River Basin, China
Kang Ling Fang,
No information about this author
Guoce Xu,
No information about this author
Wang Yun
No information about this author
et al.
Applied Sciences,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
15(9), P. 5188 - 5188
Published: May 7, 2025
Heavy
metals
(HMs),
characterized
by
their
non-biodegradable
nature,
are
prone
to
enrichment
in
river
sediments,
thereby
severely
jeopardizing
the
equilibrium
of
ecosystems
and
human
health.
Given
critical
importance
safeguarding
valuable
water
resources,
it
is
utmost
urgency
initiate
research
on
HMs
within
Yellow
River
Basin
(YRB).
This
study
collected
sediment
samples
from
analyzed
distribution
characteristics,
health
risks,
pollution
sources
utilizing
index
method,
risk
assessment,
positive
matrix
factorization
(PMF)
model.
The
results
demonstrate
that
arsenic
(As),
zinc
(Zn),
cadmium
(Cd)
primary
elements
contributing
heavy
metal
(HM)
sediments
YRB.
proportions
with
low
HM
upstream,
midstream,
downstream
36.48%,
71.43%,
72.73%,
respectively,
whereas
moderate
63.16%,
28.57%,
27.27%,
respectively.
assessment
reveals
non-carcinogenic
risks
posed
adults
negligible,
those
children
not.
Regarding
carcinogenic
As
significantly
higher
than
other
HMs.
identified
as
traffic–industrial
sources,
agricultural–industrial
industrial
respective
contribution
rates
32.47%,
44.87%,
22.66%.
Zn
prioritized
for
control,
while
highlighted
priority
control.
Language: Английский