The
objective
of
this
research
project
was
to
distinguish
handwritten
digits
using
the
Support
Vector
(SVM)
with
Freeman
chain
code,
and
subsequently,
compare
prediction
accuracy
that
K-Nearest
Neighbor
(KNN)
algorithm.
In
pursuit
goal,
SVM
pitted
against
KNN
for
task
digit
detection.
Each
two
experimental
groups
consisted
20
samples,
a
pretest
power
analysis
executed
an
80%
confidence
level.
This
Study
revealed
Machine
achieved
93.48%,
whereas
algorithm
exhibited
higher
98.05%.
Statistical
analysis,
performed
through
Independent
Sample
T-tests,
demonstrated
difference
in
between
algorithms
is
0.001
(p<0.05).
Consequently,
it
can
be
concluded
surpasses
realm
recognition.
This
work
proposes
a
Novel
Integrated
Neural
Network
(NINN)
for
Fake
profile
detection
on
Instagram
and
evaluates
its
precision
against
Support
Vector
Machine
(SVM)
algorithm.
The
goal
is
to
enhance
the
accuracy
of
identifying
fake
profiles
social
media
platform
using
NINN
approach.
It
expected
that
will
provides
reliable
predictions,
with
greater
accurate
results
than
existing
models
considered
in
this
article
classifying
reducing
security
threats
Instagram.
research
utilized
two
sample
groups,
each
containing
20
samples.
We
used
clinic
calc
tool
perform
calculations
set
significance
level
at
0.05.
implies
we
are
ready
tolerate
5%
probability
rejecting
null
hypothesis
when
it
true.
also
specified
last
beta
rate
0.2
95%
confidence
interval
(CI)
effect
size
estimation.
trained
dataset
cost
function,
their
performance
measured
by
output.
model
has
three
components:
an
input
component,
hidden
component
implements
algorithm,
output
shows
After
conducting
thorough
analysis,
Networks
Algorithm
was
found
have
90.91%,
while
had
88.19%.
A
statistical
analysis
performed
compare
algorithms.
Independent
samples
T-Test,
which
tests
means
populations
equal.
yielded
p-value
p=0.000
(p<0.05),
indicates
can
be
rejected
high
confidence.
Therefore,
difference
between
algorithms
statistically
significant.
In
Automated
classification
Instagram,
algorithm
higher
prediction
percentage
(90.91%)
(88.19%).
more
precise
method
implemented
applying
along
SVM
allows
users
distinguish
accurately.
study
overcome
drawbacks
approaches
developed
better
approach
identify
fraudulent
accounts
In
the
context
of
identifying
driver
distractions,
goal
this
study
is
to
investigate
degree
accuracy
exhibited
by
most
recent
iterations
deep
learning
algorithms.
Both
Convolutional
Neural
Networks
Utilising
LGM
Classifier
(CNNLGM)
and
Random
Forest
(RF)
are
compared
head-to-head
in
research
presented
here.
The
investigation
required
a
total
118
samples,
which
were
then
divided
equally
between
two
categories
consisting
58
specimens
each.
Group
1
utilized
CNNLGM
Classifier,
contrast
2's
utilization
RF
technique.
code
was
implemented
using
software
from
Google
Colab,
same
program
also
used
import
dataset.
A
pre-test
power
80%
an
alpha
value
0.05
taken
into
consideration
while
determining
appropriate
size
sample
for
experiment.
This
accomplished
with
assistance
online
tool
statistical
analysis.
Previous
provided
necessary
information
use.
findings
simulation
showed
that
Novel
achieved
96%,
whereas
algorithm
could
only
achieve
82%.
There
substantial
disparity
levels
approaches,
as
measured
significance
0.001
(p<0.05).
To
summarise,
when
utilizing
data
supplied,
performed
noticeably
better
than
it
came
paying
attention.
Enhancing
accuracy
of
Bitcoin
cost
prediction
using
ridge
linear
classification
over
lasso-regression.
For
confirmation
purposes,
use
the
financial
terms
'sustain'
and
'conflict'
repeatedly
to
compare
forecast.
A
simple
method
called
Lasso-regression
is
used
forecast
price
bit-coin.
Evaluation
was
conducted
assess
usefulness
each
model's
presentation
for
task,
results
were
analyzed.
The
aim
trying
so
many
dissimilar
models
analyze
variations
in
their
essential
hypotheses.
In
order
reflect
on
contribution
variables,
we
finest
parameters,
which
a
trusted
practice.
model
that
derived
from
T-test
has
value
p
0.002,
(p<0.05).
This
indicates
there
statistically
momentous
difference
between
two
algorithms.
sample
size
calculation
performed
an
80
percent
G-power
pretest,
0.05%
threshold,
95%
confidence
interval
(CI).
predicting
Bitcoin,
improvement
93.06%
when
ridge-linear
regression
with
enhanced
precision
lasso
regression,
as
indicated
by
this
research
study.
Conclusion:
Using
mapped
precision.
Effort
of
this
research
is
to
enhance
our
ability
forecast
how
underwater
wireless
sensor
networks
would
behave
for
communication.
Materials
and
make
accurate
projections
on
the
functionality
(UWSN),
it
necessary
put
Support
Vector
Machine
(SVM)
Decision
Tree
algorithms
through
their
paces
by
using
a
wide
range
training
testing
strategies.
A
sample
size
20
both
groups
calculated
Gpower
value
85%
(g
power
setting
parameters:
=0.05
power=0.85).
The
accuracy
based
result
suggests
that
SVM,
has
92.509%
than
Tree,
having
83.1156%,
with
statistically
significant
0.001
(p<0.05)
which
concludes
higher
Accuracy
Loss.
When
compared
decision
tree,
support
vector
machine
superior.
Improve
the
accuracy
of
identifying
fake
news
on
Twitter
by
employing
Advanced
K
Nearest
Neighbor
Algorithm
then
evaluating
results
against
those
obtained
through
Logistic
Regression
Algorithm.
Materials
and
Methods:
The
research
is
divided
into
two
groups,
each
with
a
sample
size
42
individuals.
first
group,
comprising
21
participants,
will
apply
Algorithm,
while
second
also
consisting
use
technique.
study
has
been
designed
G
power
80%
parameters
α=0.05
beta=0.2.
Result:
Innovative
nearest
neighbor
81.55
%
identifies
objects
increases
measured
over
79.0
implication
value
0.001
(p
<
0.05).
Conclusion:
In
terms
accuracy,
outperforms
The
objective
of
this
research
project
was
to
distinguish
handwritten
digits
using
the
Support
Vector
(SVM)
with
Freeman
chain
code,
and
subsequently,
compare
prediction
accuracy
that
K-Nearest
Neighbor
(KNN)
algorithm.
In
pursuit
goal,
SVM
pitted
against
KNN
for
task
digit
detection.
Each
two
experimental
groups
consisted
20
samples,
a
pretest
power
analysis
executed
an
80%
confidence
level.
This
Study
revealed
Machine
achieved
93.48%,
whereas
algorithm
exhibited
higher
98.05%.
Statistical
analysis,
performed
through
Independent
Sample
T-tests,
demonstrated
difference
in
between
algorithms
is
0.001
(p<0.05).
Consequently,
it
can
be
concluded
surpasses
realm
recognition.