American Journal of Reproductive Immunology,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
91(4)
Published: April 1, 2024
Abstract
Preeclampsia
is
one
of
the
most
common
disorders
that
poses
threat
to
both
mothers
and
neonates
a
major
contributor
perinatal
morbidity
mortality
worldwide.
Viral
infection
during
pregnancy
not
typically
considered
cause
preeclampsia;
however,
syndromic
nature
preeclampsia
etiology
immunomodulatory
effects
viral
infections
suggest
microbes
could
trigger
subset
preeclampsia.
Notably,
SARS‐CoV‐2
associated
with
an
increased
risk
Herein,
we
review
potential
role
in
this
great
obstetrical
syndrome.
According
vitro
vivo
experimental
studies,
can
by
introducing
poor
placentation,
syncytiotrophoblast
stress,
and/or
maternal
systemic
inflammation,
which
are
all
known
play
critical
development
Moreover,
clinical
investigations
have
suggested
link
between
several
viruses
onset
via
multiple
pathways.
However,
results
research
always
consistent.
Therefore,
future
studies
should
investigate
causal
elucidate
mechanism
behind
relationship
itself.
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
25(1)
Published: March 26, 2025
In
recent
years,
severe
acute
respiratory
syndrome
corona
virus
2
(SARS-CoV-2)
infection
has
been
prevalent
worldwide.
Pregnant
women
belong
to
a
special
group,
and
it
is
very
important
for
clinicians
pay
attention
the
impact
of
SARS-CoV-2
on
pregnancy
outcomes.
However,
there
are
limited
studies
outcomes
during
first
trimester.
To
investigate
effect
in
trimester
Clinical
information
pregnant
whose
last
menstrual
period
was
between
October
1,
2022,
April
2023,
who
were
registered
Obstetrics
Gynecology
department
Peking
University
International
Hospital,
analyzed.
Among
them,
498
with
included
study
group;
while
total
654
no
control
group.
Mann
Whitney
U
test,
χ2
Fisher's
exact
probability
method,
multivariate
logistic
regression
used
analyze
A
30
cases
group
experienced
loss
before
28
weeks
gestation,
468
delivered.
41
613
The
rates
two
groups
6.02%
6.27%,
respectively,
statistically
significant
difference
(P
>
0.05).
There
0.05)
baseline
data
(delivery
age,
pre-pregnancy
body
mass
index,
gestational
parity)
groups.
neonatal
malformation,
premature
birth,
rupture
membranes,
postpartum
hemorrhage,
cesarean
section,
small
age
infants,
low
birth
weight
macrosomia,
asphyxia
compared,
incidence
hypertension
significantly
higher
than
that
=
0.012).
this
single
center
study,
we
found
may
increase
risk
hypertension,
incidences
other
adverse
such
as
did
not
compared
without
Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology,
Journal Year:
2021,
Volume and Issue:
59(2), P. 146 - 152
Published: Nov. 12, 2021
The
coronavirus
disease
2019
(COVID-19)
pandemic
has
had
a
significant
impact
on
the
provision
of
maternal
healthcare
and
fetal
outcomes
around
world1-4.
An
increase
in
morbidity
mortality
been
identified
attributed
to
number
causes5.
These
include
difficulties
faced
by
systems
adapting
rapidly
changing
circumstances
during
inequity
service
globally
according
income
status
country6.
In
general,
women
are
at
increased
risk
infection
pregnancy.
Alterations
immune
function
physiological
demand
metabolism
can
lead
more
complicated
recovery
worse
outcome7.
particular,
pregnant
severe
respiratory
illness,
for
example,
influenza8,
9.
During
COVID-19
pandemic,
relationship
between
acute
syndrome
2
(SARS-CoV-2)
health
explored
large-scale
cohort
studies
meta-analyses
current
literature.
have
highlighted
an
apparent
link
pre-eclampsia10-12,
but
it
is
not
currently
known
whether
this
association
causal.
1965,
English
statistician
Sir
Austin
Bradford
Hill
proposed
set
nine
criteria
assess
causality
presumed
cause
observed
effect13.
While
some
advocate
against
exclusive
use
these
judge
causality,
arguing,
that
scientific
deduction
powerful,
they
still
widely
accepted
applied.
are:
(1)
strength
(effect
size),
i.e.
larger
association,
greater
likelihood
causal;
(2)
consistency
(reproducibility),
consistent
findings
different
persons
places
with
samples
strengthens
effect
being
(3)
specificity,
causation
likely
if
there
very
specific
population
site
no
other
explanation;
(4)
temporal
sequence;
(5)
biological
gradient
(dose–response
relationship),
exposure
should
generally
incidence
effect;
(6)
plausibility;
(7)
coherence
(between
epidemiological
laboratory
findings);
(8)
experimental
evidence;
(9)
analogous
evidence.
Some
authors
also
reversibility,
removed,
disappear.
Based
published
literature,
we
assessed
SARS-CoV-2
pregnancy
development
pre-eclampsia
using
criteria.
A
national
study
342
090
was
conducted
England
29
May
2020
31
July
2021,
as
part
National
Maternity
Perinatal
Audit14.
found
testing
positive
time
birth
higher
rates
death,
preterm
delivery,
or
eclampsia
delivery
emergency
Cesarean
section,
compared
without
test
SARS-CoV-2.
rate
3.9%
2.5%
those
(adjusted
odds
ratio
(aOR),
1.55;
95%
CI,
1.29–1.85;
P
<
0.001).
INTERCOVID
study10,
multinational
outcome
43
institutions
across
18
countries,
total
706
diagnosed
1424
COVID-19.
This
were
pre-eclampsia,
hemolysis,
elevated
liver
enzymes
low
platelet
count
(HELLP)
(8.4%
vs
4.4%;
relative
(RR),
1.76;
1.27–2.43).
Women
either
asymptomatic
symptomatic
who
factors
such
body
mass
index
(BMI),
diabetes,
pre-existing
hypertension
chronic
comorbidities,
4
times
developing
did
infection.
(RR,
1.59;
1.30–1.94).
majority
(83%)
births
medically
indicated;
leading
indication
pre-eclampsia/eclampsia/HELLP
(24.7%).
Moreover,
when
calculated,
infection,
several
complications,
including
pregnancy-induced
hypertension,
eclampsia,
HELLP
death10.
Conde-Agudelo
Romero
recently
performed
systematic
review
28
included
790
954
globe,
whom
15
524
infection12.
meta-analysis
aORs
demonstrated
associated
(pooled
aOR,
1.58;
1.39–1.80;
0.0001;
I2
=
0%;
11
studies).
There
1.18–2.63;
58%;
seven
studies),
1.97;
1.01–3.84;
three
studies)
2.10;
1.48–2.97;
one
study)
large
important
COVID-19,
UK,
USA
Mexican
populations15,
16,
designed
specifically
hypertensive
disorders
pregnancy,
so
able
add
data
address
question.
Of
Romero12,
14
North
America,
six
Europe,
five
Asia
two
Latin
America.
remaining
countries.
heterogeneity
among
visually
inspecting
forest
plots
estimating
I2.
Significant
predefined
value
≥
30%.
prespecified
subgroups
analyzed
explore
potential
sources
defined
severity
(asymptomatic
symptomatic),
design
(retrospective
prospective
cross-sectional),
assessment
primary
secondary
aim,
confounding
controlled
(yes
no),
geographic
location
(North
America
Europe
multiregion),
sample
size
(<
200
200–999
1000–5000
>
5000),
used
diagnosing
(reverse-transcription
polymerase
chain
reaction
(RT-PCR)
RT-PCR
antigens
antibodies
serum
mixed/unclear)
timing
diagnosis
(at
any
admission
delivery).
bias
results
examined
performing
sensitivity
analysis
only
bias.
direction
magnitude
most
subgroup
analyses.
However,
smaller
women),
retrospective
adjust
from
Asia,
reported
slightly
ORs
than
larger,
cross-sectional
factors.
It
be
recognized
dominated
studies,
UK14
USA17,
which
collectively
contributed
748
526
(94.6%)
meta-analysis,
could
potentially
temper
conclusions
drawn
regarding
reproducibility
countries
ethnicities.
UK
study14,
white
(76.3%),
Asian
(12.2%)
black
(4.6%)
women,
persisted
even
after
multiple
regression
adjusting
age,
ethnicity,
parity,
diabetes
mellitus,
socioeconomic
deprivation
measured
2019.
summary,
good
evidence
further
needed.
Pre-eclampsia
well-documented
previous
renal
disease,
mellitus
autoimmune
nulliparity,
age
40
years,
BMI
35
kg/m2,
family
history
interpregnancy
interval
10
years
conception
in-vitro
fertilization18-20.
Low-dose
aspirin,
started
before
weeks'
gestation,
reduces
high-risk
women21.
clear
contracting
similar
non-pregnant
individuals,
namely
black,
minority
overweight/obese
having
comorbidity
(in
asthma
hypertension)22,
23.
overlap
highlights
conditions.
study24
overweight
first
antenatal
visit
subsequently
highest
pre-eclampsia/eclampsia
2.62;
1.57–4.36),
suggests
modifies
exposure.
Romero12
varied
significantly
analyses
adjusted,
adjusted
BMI,
comorbidities
race/ethnicity.
Fourteen
confounders
perform
matching
variables.
Four
evaluate
pre-eclampsia10,
25-27.
these,
one25
factors,
one26
race
one27
race,
low-dose
aspirin
one10
cigarette
smoking,
overweight/obese,
cardiac
adverse
outcome.
unadjusted
OR
(95%
CI)
four
were,
respectively,
1.94
(1.09–3.46),
1.33
(0.64–2.75),
1.76
(1.01–3.05)
1.93
(1.34–2.78).
comparable
pooled
1.62
1.45–1.82)
all
meta-analysis12.
adjustment
incomplete
best,
suggest
subsequent
maintained
point
pregnancy;
13
delivery.
latter
USA17
94.6%
meta-analysis.
is,
therefore,
unlikely
meaningful
information
studies.
Few
focused
preceded
did28,
1223
SARS-CoV-2-positive
51
cases
21
same
gestational
23
When
develop
trend
towards
moderate
(unadjusted
RR,
2.28
0.92–5.61)
(P
0.07);
RR
(aRR),
1.96
0.8–4.84)
0.14)).
study28,
SARS-CoV-2,
median
16
(interquartile
range
(IQR),
7–61)
days.
Only
study26
pre-eclampsia.
study,
3.79
(IQR,
0.43–13.0)
weeks.
hazard
2.88
1.20–6.93)
32
weeks
2.74
0.98–7.71)
gestation.
absence
evaluating
under-reporting
go
made
third
trimester;
given
pathophysiology
thought
originate
early
second
trimesters,
might
expected
causal
would
readily
established
earlier
ages.
conclusion,
suggested
confirmed.
both
stronger
patients
(OR,
2.11;
1.59–2.81)
1.21–2.10).
1219
giving
33
hospitals
Institutes
Health
(NIH)
classifying
asymptomatic,
mild,
moderate,
critical29.
On
analysis,
severe-to-critical
(40.4%
18.8%;
aRR,
1.61;
1.18–2.20).
mild-to-moderate
perinatal
outcome,
longer
duration
syndrome10.
observational
pre-eclampsia28.
Patients
classified
into
groups
based
NIH
criteria:
severe.
model
prior
characteristics
medical
history,
competing-risks
model.
excluded
analysis.
Compared
background
(expected)
1%,
1.9%,
2.2%,
5.7%,
11.1%,
respectively.
monotonic
statistically
(chi-square
0.0017).
After
differences
determined
model,
almost
5-fold
(aRR,
4.9;
1.56–15.38).
Moderate
mild
3.3;
1.48–7.38).
argued
their
finding
supports
hypothesis
relationship.
Several
mechanisms
systemic
high
blood
pressure,
injury
thrombocytopenia,
well
typical
COVID-1930.
One
theory
proposes
involvement
angiotensin-converting
enzyme
(ACE2)
receptor.
Activation
renin–angiotensin–aldosterone
system
ultimately
leads
cleavage
angiotensin
I
(ACE),
converting
II.
Angiotensin
II,
via
(potent
arteriolar
vasoconstriction,
tubular
sodium
reabsorption,
aldosterone
secretion
antidiuretic
hormone
secretion)
pressure31.
ACE2
counterbalances
actions
ACE
cleaving
hydrolyzing
(1–7),
vasodilator.
enters
cells
lungs
organs
receptor32.
spike
S1
protein
binds
enzymatic
domain
receptor
cell
surface,
resulting
translocation
virus
cell33.
binding
causes
downregulation
enzyme,
reduced
conversion
II
allowing
act
relatively
unopposed.
expressed
syncytiotrophoblast
cytotrophoblast34,
placenta,
where
plays
role
trophoblast
proliferation,
angiogenesis
arterial
pressure
regulation
Downregulation
placenta
may
placental
oxidative
stress
release
antiangiogenic
soluble
fms-like
tyrosine
kinase-1
(sFlt-1)36,
reduction
proangiogenic
characteristic
features
syndrome37-43
(Figure
1).
study44
assessing
differentially
genes
clinical
datasets.
upregulate
sFlt-1
endoglin
(both
vasoconstriction),
nitric
oxide
modulators
prothrombotic-related
molecules.
are,
plausible
abovementioned
demonstrates
production
prothrombotic
molecules
result
data.
histopathological
lesions
COVID-1945,
46.
Many
viruses
changes
morphology,
seen
zika
cytomegalovirus
infection47,
48.
reports
that,
controls,
placentae
showed
poor
vascular
perfusion49.
decidual
arteriopathy,
peripheral
central
villous
infarction
agglutination.
unknown
what
placenta.
Another
microvasculopathy
common
women50,
suggesting
differ
relation
progression,
stage
viral
clearance
already
achieved.
patient
prominent
lymphohistiocytic
villitis
malperfusion
changes.
indicate
occur
phase
disease50,
51.
Prospective
provide
valuable
nature
compare
measurements
hematological,
biochemical
immunological
examination.
Clearly,
randomized
trial
neither
feasible
nor
ethical.
coronavirus-spectrum
(including
syndrome,
Middle
East
COVID-19)
general
population11.
If
then
vaccination
antiviral
therapies
mitigation
measures
reduce
vaccinated
unvaccinated
COVID-1952,
protect
(1.4%
11.3%;
0.13;
0.03–0.50;
0.003)
non-significant
decrease
(0.7%
1.2%;
0.58;
0.08–4.25;
0.59).
Ongoing
placebo-controlled
trials
will
establish
outcomes,
pre-eclampsia53.
Even
though
available
support
limitations
research
needed
questions
assertion
made.
1.5
(as
to,
200-fold
cancer
chimney
sweepers,
cited
Hill)
considered
too
small
proven
conceivably
underlying
contributors
(i.e.
confounding).
questioned
following
advancements
genetics,
science
statistics
21st
century54,
improved
our
analytical
capabilities
exploring
cause-and-effect
relationships
ability
appreciate
complexity
onset
progression
disease.
understanding
origin
led
researchers
question
considering
multifactorial
causality49.
growing
causal,
particularly
plausibility.
however,
bolster
criteria,
sequence,
perhaps
criterion
epidemiologists
universally
agree
essential
inference54.
possible
mediated
through
cardiovascular
pathology,
required
understand
mechanisms.
Since
publication,
determining
associations,
seismic
advances
fields
(for
molecular
genomics,
toxicology
genotoxicology)
technology
computers,
software,
methods).
disciplines
'peer
box'
time)
disease54.
means
cause–effect
often
degree
certainty,
argue
instances,
reliance
becomes
less
relevant.
Others,
application
enhanced
integrating
new
techniques
each
making
about
robust54.
acknowledged
case
just
beginning
shine
light
onto
particular
'black
Healthcare
professionals
aware
remain
factor
They
cognisant
additive
combination
conditions
Pregnant
benefit
close
monitoring
order
allow
syndrome55.
Performing
swab
presenting
non-classical
markers
useful
settings
SAR-CoV-2
universal55.
Reproductive Health,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
21(1)
Published: March 4, 2024
Abstract
Background
To
evaluate
the
relationship
between
coronavirus
disease
2019
(COVID-19)
infection
at
different
time
points
during
pregnancy
and
perinatal
outcomes.
Methods
This
retrospective
study
included
611
women
who
hospitalized
for
delivery
December
7
April
30,
2023.
Based
on
weeks
infected
with
COVID-19,
participants
were
divided
into
four
groups:
Group
1
(14–27
+6
gestation),
2
(28–36
3
(37–39
4
(≥
40
gestation).
Data
including
maternal
demographic
characteristics,
clinical
profiles,
outcomes
analyzed.
Results
There
no
significant
differences
in
characteristics
among
groups
(
P
>
0.05).
Compared
to
Groups
4,
a
higher
rate
of
fever
was
noted
<
The
frequency
preeclampsia
gestational
diabetes
mellitus
showed
decreasing
trend
as
progressing
Preterm
neonatal
intensive
care
unit
admission
more
frequently
observed
than
Multivariate
logistic
regression
analysis
demonstrated
that
timing
gestation
which
COVID-19
not
associated
preterm
0.05),
whereas
age
negatively
occurrence
Conclusions
Gestational
is
simple
parameter
predicts
adverse
aid
clinicians
determining
provide
early
enhanced
prenatal
increased
monitoring
reduce
complications.
American Journal of Reproductive Immunology,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
91(4)
Published: April 1, 2024
Abstract
Preeclampsia
is
one
of
the
most
common
disorders
that
poses
threat
to
both
mothers
and
neonates
a
major
contributor
perinatal
morbidity
mortality
worldwide.
Viral
infection
during
pregnancy
not
typically
considered
cause
preeclampsia;
however,
syndromic
nature
preeclampsia
etiology
immunomodulatory
effects
viral
infections
suggest
microbes
could
trigger
subset
preeclampsia.
Notably,
SARS‐CoV‐2
associated
with
an
increased
risk
Herein,
we
review
potential
role
in
this
great
obstetrical
syndrome.
According
vitro
vivo
experimental
studies,
can
by
introducing
poor
placentation,
syncytiotrophoblast
stress,
and/or
maternal
systemic
inflammation,
which
are
all
known
play
critical
development
Moreover,
clinical
investigations
have
suggested
link
between
several
viruses
onset
via
multiple
pathways.
However,
results
research
always
consistent.
Therefore,
future
studies
should
investigate
causal
elucidate
mechanism
behind
relationship
itself.