Journal of Dual Diagnosis,
Journal Year:
2019,
Volume and Issue:
16(1), P. 83 - 105
Published: July 16, 2019
Objective:
Shifting
policies
and
widespread
acceptance
of
cannabis
for
medical
and/or
recreational
purposes
have
fueled
worries
increased
initiation
use
in
adolescents.
In
particular,
the
adolescent
period
is
thought
to
be
associated
with
an
susceptibility
potential
harms
repeated
use,
due
being
a
critical
neuromaturational
events
brain.
This
review
investigates
neuroimaging
evidence
brain
attributable
use.
Methods:
PubMed
Scopus
searches
were
conducted
empirical
articles
that
examined
effects
both
users
adult
user
studies
explored
effect
age
at
onset
on
Results:
We
found
43
(structural
functional
magnetic
resonance
imaging)
20
link
between
users.
Studies
relative
nonusers
mainly
implicate
frontal
parietal
regions
activation
relation
inhibitory
control,
reward,
memory.
However,
adults
are
more
mixed,
many
which
did
not
observe
imaging
metrics.
Conclusions:
While
there
some
compromised
frontoparietal
structure
function
it
remains
unclear
whether
observed
specifically
or
general
use–related
factors
such
as
depressive
symptoms.
The
contribution
chronicity
will
comprehensively
prospective,
longitudinal
rigorous
measures
(dosage,
exposure,
dependence,
constituent
compounds
cannabinoid
levels).
Alcohol research,
Journal Year:
2021,
Volume and Issue:
41(1)
Published: Jan. 1, 2021
Alcohol
and
cannabis
are
the
most
commonly
used
substances
during
adolescence
typically
initiated
this
sensitive
neurodevelopmental
period.
The
aim
of
review
is
to
provide
a
comprehensive
overview
recent
literature
focused
on
understanding
how
these
affect
developing
brain.Articles
included
in
were
identified
by
entering
30
search
terms
substance
use,
adolescence,
neurodevelopment
into
MEDLINE,
Embase,
PsycINFO,
ProQuest
Central,
Web
Science.
Studies
eligible
for
inclusion
if
they
longitudinally
examined
effect
adolescent
alcohol
and/or
use
structural
or
functional
outcomes
50
more
participants.More
than
700
articles
captured
search,
43
longitudinal
studies
met
criteria,
including
18
13
12
co-use.Existing
suggest
heavy
related
small
moderate
disruptions
brain
structure
function,
as
well
neurocognitive
impairment.
effects
include
widespread
decreases
gray
matter
volume
cortical
thickness
across
time;
slowed
white
growth
poorer
integrity;
disrupted
network
efficiency;
impulse
attentional
control,
learning,
memory,
visuospatial
processing,
psychomotor
speed.
severity
some
dependent
dose.
Heavy
very
associated
with
decreased
subcortical
increased
frontoparietal
thickness,
development,
executive
functioning
IQ
compared
non-using
controls.
Overall,
co-use
findings
pronounced
use.
Several
limitations
exist
literature.
Sample
sizes
relatively
demographically
homogenous,
significant
heterogeneity
patterns
methodologies
studies.
More
research
needed
clarify
dosing
interactions
between
substances,
sociodemographic
environmental
factors,
outcomes.
Larger
studies,
already
underway,
will
help
relationship
development
Frontiers in Psychiatry,
Journal Year:
2021,
Volume and Issue:
12
Published: March 30, 2021
Over
years,
the
regular
use
of
cannabis
has
substantially
increased
among
young
adults,
as
indicated
by
rise
in
disorder
(CUD),
with
an
estimated
prevalence
8.
3%
United
States.
Research
shows
that
exposure
to
is
associated
hypodopaminergic
anhedonia
(depression),
cognitive
decline,
poor
memory,
inattention,
impaired
learning
performance,
reduced
dopamine
brain
response-associated
emotionality,
and
addiction
severity
adults.
The
medicine
community
increasing
concern
because
high
content
delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol
(THC)
currently
found
oral
vaping
products,
effects
may
become
more
pronounced
adults
who
these
products.
Preliminary
research
suggests
it
possible
induce
'dopamine
homeostasis,'
is,
restore
function
upregulation
proposed
compound
normalize
behavior
chronic
users
cannabis-induced
(depression)
decline.
This
psychological,
neurobiological,
anatomical,
genetic,
epigenetic
also
could
provide
evidence
for
development
appropriate
policy
regarding
decriminalization
recreational
use.
Psychopharmacology,
Journal Year:
2021,
Volume and Issue:
238(10), P. 2709 - 2728
Published: Sept. 10, 2021
Abstract
Rationale
Regular
cannabis
use
(i.e.
≥
monthly)
is
highly
prevalent,
with
past
year
being
reported
by
~
200
million
people
globally.High
reactivity
to
cues
a
key
feature
of
regular
and
has
been
ascribed
greater
exposure
craving,
but
the
underlying
neurobiology
yet
be
systematically
integrated.
Objectives
We
aim
summarise
findings
from
fMRI
studies
which
examined
brain
function
in
users
while
exposed
vs
neutral
stimuli
during
cue-reactivity
task.
Methods
A
systematic
search
PsycINFO,
PubMed
Scopus
databases
was
pre-registered
PROSPERO
(CRD42020171750)
conducted
following
PRISMA
guidelines.
Eighteen
met
inclusion/exclusion
criteria.
Samples
comprised
918
participants
(340
female)
aged
16–38
years.
Of
these,
603
were
users,
315
controls.
Results
The
literature
consistently
activity
three
areas:
striatum,
prefrontal
(anterior
cingulate,
middle
frontal)
parietal
cortex
(posterior
cingulate/precuneus)
additional
regions
(hippocampus,
amygdala,
thalamus,
occipital
cortex).
Preliminary
correlations
emerged
between
craving
partially
overlapping
(amygdala,
orbitofrontal
).
Conclusions
Exposure
cannabis-cues
may
elicit
thus
trigger
cravings
craving.
Standardised
longitudinal
assessments
related
problems
are
required
profile
precision
cue-reactivity,
its
role
predicting
relapse.
Journal of Dual Diagnosis,
Journal Year:
2019,
Volume and Issue:
16(1), P. 83 - 105
Published: July 16, 2019
Objective:
Shifting
policies
and
widespread
acceptance
of
cannabis
for
medical
and/or
recreational
purposes
have
fueled
worries
increased
initiation
use
in
adolescents.
In
particular,
the
adolescent
period
is
thought
to
be
associated
with
an
susceptibility
potential
harms
repeated
use,
due
being
a
critical
neuromaturational
events
brain.
This
review
investigates
neuroimaging
evidence
brain
attributable
use.
Methods:
PubMed
Scopus
searches
were
conducted
empirical
articles
that
examined
effects
both
users
adult
user
studies
explored
effect
age
at
onset
on
Results:
We
found
43
(structural
functional
magnetic
resonance
imaging)
20
link
between
users.
Studies
relative
nonusers
mainly
implicate
frontal
parietal
regions
activation
relation
inhibitory
control,
reward,
memory.
However,
adults
are
more
mixed,
many
which
did
not
observe
imaging
metrics.
Conclusions:
While
there
some
compromised
frontoparietal
structure
function
it
remains
unclear
whether
observed
specifically
or
general
use–related
factors
such
as
depressive
symptoms.
The
contribution
chronicity
will
comprehensively
prospective,
longitudinal
rigorous
measures
(dosage,
exposure,
dependence,
constituent
compounds
cannabinoid
levels).